Kuznetsova E A, Moskvicheva N L, Zinovyeva E V, Kostromina S N
Saint Petersburg State University, Russia.
Psychol Russ. 2023 Jun 15;16(2):3-21. doi: 10.11621/pir.2023.0201. eCollection 2023.
The COVID-19 pandemic is a multifaceted stressor. Its impact suggests long-term psychological effects. Self-determination promotes flexibility of goals and actions and helps to overcome the difficulties caused by stress.
To analyze coping strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic presented in Russian scientific studies (RQ1), and their relationship with self-determination (RQ2).
Relevant studies (2020-2022) were selected from the Russian citation index (RSCI) database. Strict selection criteria were used. Twenty-four articles were selected for the final review. For dynamic analysis, four stages of the pandemic were identified.
Prevailing coping strategies have changed over time. At the beginning of the pandemic, respondents used familiar coping mechanisms. Six months later, active coping strategies were more often used, but deprivation and avoidance strategies increased. A year later, there was an increase in denial and avoidance strategies. Using non-constructive coping strategies may indicate that, due to the long course of the pandemic, meeting basic psychological needs became increasingly frustrated, leading to helplessness, alienation, and lack of control. Later dynamics reflect the growth of effective coping strategies and confirm that when basic needs are blocked for a long time, people seek alternative ways to satisfy them.
The dynamics of coping strategies during the pandemic reflected their close relationship with basic psychological needs, as described in the theory of self-determination. The results confirmed the importance of self-determination as a dispositional variable in predicting coping mechanisms.
新冠疫情是一个多方面的压力源。其影响表明存在长期心理效应。自我决定促进目标和行动的灵活性，并有助于克服压力带来的困难。
分析俄罗斯科学研究中呈现的新冠疫情期间的应对策略（研究问题1），以及它们与自我决定的关系（研究问题2）。
从俄罗斯科学引文索引（RSCI）数据库中选取相关研究（2020 - 2022年）。使用了严格的筛选标准。最终选定24篇文章进行综述。为进行动态分析，确定了疫情的四个阶段。
主流应对策略随时间发生了变化。在疫情初期，受访者使用熟悉的应对机制。六个月后，更常使用积极应对策略，但剥夺和回避策略有所增加。一年后，否认和回避策略有所增加。使用非建设性应对策略可能表明，由于疫情持续时间长，满足基本心理需求变得越来越受挫，导致无助、疏离和缺乏控制感。后期动态反映了有效应对策略的增长，并证实当基本需求长期受阻时，人们会寻求替代方法来满足它们。
疫情期间应对策略的动态变化反映了它们与自我决定理论中所描述的基本心理需求的密切关系。结果证实了自我决定作为预测应对机制的一个倾向性变量的重要性。
