Suppr超能文献

针对多学科家庭护理团队对功能评估量表进行验证。

Validation of the Functional Assessment Inventory against a multidisciplinary home care team.

作者信息

Robinson B E, Lund C A, Keller D, Cuervo C A

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 1986 Dec;34(12):851-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1986.tb07257.x.

Abstract

Systematic multidimensional assessment techniques such as the Functional Assessment Inventory (FAI) are increasingly used with the elderly for outcome measurement, prediction of service needs, and accurate description for comparative purposes. The FAI is a structured interview followed by a rating process which compares patient status against standard descriptive phrases. Patients are assessed in five areas: mental health, physical health, social resources, economic resources, and activities of daily living (ADL). The validity of the FAI was tested by comparing ratings of patient health obtained by a single investigator using only the instrument with ratings obtained by consensus from an interdisciplinary home care team providing long-term care for the patients studied. An excellent level of agreement (weighted kappas from .583 to .780) was found in all areas studied. A single significant difference in ADL rating with a high correlation coefficient (r = .85) was interpreted as due to a difference between the single rater and the team in the definition of ADL. The ease of obtaining summary ratings from clinical personnel suggests that further exploration of this rapid quantification of patient health is warranted.

摘要

系统性多维评估技术,如功能评估量表(FAI),越来越多地用于老年人的结果测量、服务需求预测以及为比较目的进行的准确描述。FAI是一种结构化访谈,随后是一个评分过程,该过程将患者状况与标准描述性短语进行比较。患者在五个领域接受评估:心理健康、身体健康、社会资源、经济资源和日常生活活动(ADL)。通过比较仅使用该工具的单一调查员获得的患者健康评分与为所研究患者提供长期护理的跨学科家庭护理团队通过共识获得的评分,对FAI的有效性进行了测试。在所研究的所有领域中都发现了极好的一致性水平(加权卡帕系数从0.583到0.780)。ADL评分中一个具有高相关系数(r = 0.85)的显著差异被解释为是由于单一评分者和团队在ADL定义上的差异。从临床人员那里获得总结评分的简便性表明,有必要进一步探索这种对患者健康的快速量化方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验