Hutton Todd M, Aaronson Scott T, Carpenter Linda L, Pages Kenneth, Krantz David, Lucas Lindsay, Chen Bing, Sackeim Harold A
Southern California TMS Center, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Sheppard Pratt Health System, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Brain Stimul. 2023 Sep-Oct;16(5):1510-1521. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.10.001. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
The number of sessions in an acute TMS course for major depressive disorder (MDD) is greater than in the earlier randomized controlled trials.
To compare clinical outcomes in groups that received differing numbers of TMS sessions.
From a registry sample (N = 13,732), data were extracted for 7215 patients treated for MDD with PHQ-9 assessments before and after their TMS course. Groups were defined by number of acute course treatment sessions: 1-19 (N = 658), 20-29 (N = 616), 30-35 (N = 1375), 36 (N = 3591), 37-41 (N = 626), or >41 (N = 349) and compared in clinical outcomes at endpoint and at fixed intervals (after 10, 20, 30, and 36 sessions). The impact of additional treatments beyond 36 sessions was also examined.
Groups that received fewer than 30 sessions had inferior endpoint outcomes than all other groups. PHQ-9 symptom reduction was greatest in the group that ended treatment at 36 sessions. The extended treatment groups (>36 sessions) differed from all other groups by manifesting less antidepressant response early in the course and had a slower but steady rate of improvement over time. Extending treatment beyond 36 sessions was associated with further improvement without evidence of a plateau.
In real-world practice, there are strong relations between the number of TMS sessions in a course and the magnitude of symptom reduction. Courses with less than 30 sessions are associated with diminished benefit. Patients with longer than standard courses typically show less initial improvement and a more gradual trajectory, but meaningful benefit accrues with treatment beyond 36 sessions.
针对重度抑郁症(MDD)的急性重复经颅磁刺激(TMS)疗程中的治疗次数比早期随机对照试验中的更多。
比较接受不同次数TMS治疗的组的临床结局。
从登记样本(N = 13732)中,提取了7215例接受MDD治疗的患者的数据,这些患者在TMS疗程前后均进行了PHQ-9评估。根据急性疗程治疗次数定义分组:1-19次(N = 658)、20-29次(N = 616)、30-35次(N = 1375)、36次(N = 3591)、37-41次(N = 626)或>41次(N = 349),并比较终点时和固定间隔(10、20、30和36次治疗后)的临床结局。还研究了36次治疗后额外治疗的影响。
接受少于30次治疗的组的终点结局比所有其他组都差。PHQ-9症状减轻在以36次治疗结束的组中最大。延长治疗组(>36次治疗)与所有其他组的不同之处在于,在疗程早期表现出较少的抗抑郁反应,且随着时间的推移改善速度较慢但较为稳定。将治疗延长至36次以上与进一步改善相关,且无达到平台期的证据。
在实际临床实践中,TMS疗程中的治疗次数与症状减轻程度之间存在密切关系。少于30次治疗的疗程获益减少。疗程长于标准疗程的患者通常初始改善较少且轨迹较为缓慢,但超过36次治疗后仍可获得有意义的获益。