• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重度抑郁症经颅磁刺激治疗的剂量:大型患者登记数据库中治疗疗程数量与疗效的关系

Dosing transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depressive disorder: Relations between number of treatment sessions and effectiveness in a large patient registry.

作者信息

Hutton Todd M, Aaronson Scott T, Carpenter Linda L, Pages Kenneth, Krantz David, Lucas Lindsay, Chen Bing, Sackeim Harold A

机构信息

Southern California TMS Center, Pasadena, CA, USA.

Sheppard Pratt Health System, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Brain Stimul. 2023 Sep-Oct;16(5):1510-1521. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.10.001. Epub 2023 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.brs.2023.10.001
PMID:37827360
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The number of sessions in an acute TMS course for major depressive disorder (MDD) is greater than in the earlier randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE

To compare clinical outcomes in groups that received differing numbers of TMS sessions.

METHODS

From a registry sample (N = 13,732), data were extracted for 7215 patients treated for MDD with PHQ-9 assessments before and after their TMS course. Groups were defined by number of acute course treatment sessions: 1-19 (N = 658), 20-29 (N = 616), 30-35 (N = 1375), 36 (N = 3591), 37-41 (N = 626), or >41 (N = 349) and compared in clinical outcomes at endpoint and at fixed intervals (after 10, 20, 30, and 36 sessions). The impact of additional treatments beyond 36 sessions was also examined.

RESULTS

Groups that received fewer than 30 sessions had inferior endpoint outcomes than all other groups. PHQ-9 symptom reduction was greatest in the group that ended treatment at 36 sessions. The extended treatment groups (>36 sessions) differed from all other groups by manifesting less antidepressant response early in the course and had a slower but steady rate of improvement over time. Extending treatment beyond 36 sessions was associated with further improvement without evidence of a plateau.

CONCLUSIONS

In real-world practice, there are strong relations between the number of TMS sessions in a course and the magnitude of symptom reduction. Courses with less than 30 sessions are associated with diminished benefit. Patients with longer than standard courses typically show less initial improvement and a more gradual trajectory, but meaningful benefit accrues with treatment beyond 36 sessions.

摘要

背景

针对重度抑郁症(MDD)的急性重复经颅磁刺激(TMS)疗程中的治疗次数比早期随机对照试验中的更多。

目的

比较接受不同次数TMS治疗的组的临床结局。

方法

从登记样本(N = 13732)中,提取了7215例接受MDD治疗的患者的数据,这些患者在TMS疗程前后均进行了PHQ-9评估。根据急性疗程治疗次数定义分组:1-19次(N = 658)、20-29次(N = 616)、30-35次(N = 1375)、36次(N = 3591)、37-41次(N = 626)或>41次(N = 349),并比较终点时和固定间隔(10、20、30和36次治疗后)的临床结局。还研究了36次治疗后额外治疗的影响。

结果

接受少于30次治疗的组的终点结局比所有其他组都差。PHQ-9症状减轻在以36次治疗结束的组中最大。延长治疗组(>36次治疗)与所有其他组的不同之处在于,在疗程早期表现出较少的抗抑郁反应,且随着时间的推移改善速度较慢但较为稳定。将治疗延长至36次以上与进一步改善相关,且无达到平台期的证据。

结论

在实际临床实践中,TMS疗程中的治疗次数与症状减轻程度之间存在密切关系。少于30次治疗的疗程获益减少。疗程长于标准疗程的患者通常初始改善较少且轨迹较为缓慢,但超过36次治疗后仍可获得有意义的获益。

相似文献

1
Dosing transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depressive disorder: Relations between number of treatment sessions and effectiveness in a large patient registry.重度抑郁症经颅磁刺激治疗的剂量:大型患者登记数据库中治疗疗程数量与疗效的关系
Brain Stimul. 2023 Sep-Oct;16(5):1510-1521. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.10.001. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
2
Clinical outcomes in a large registry of patients with major depressive disorder treated with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.一项大型重度抑郁症患者经颅磁刺激治疗注册研究的临床结局。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Dec 1;277:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.005. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
3
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for major depression: a multisite, naturalistic, observational study of acute treatment outcomes in clinical practice.经颅磁刺激(TMS)治疗重度抑郁症:临床实践中急性治疗结局的多中心、自然主义、观察性研究。
Depress Anxiety. 2012 Jul;29(7):587-96. doi: 10.1002/da.21969. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
4
When to hold and when to fold: Early prediction of nonresponse to transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depressive disorder.何时坚持,何时放弃:早期预测重度抑郁症患者对经颅磁刺激治疗的无反应性。
Brain Stimul. 2024 Mar-Apr;17(2):272-282. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.02.019. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
5
Comparison of clinical outcomes with left unilateral and sequential bilateral Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) treatment of major depressive disorder in a large patient registry.在一个大型患者登记处中,对左单侧和序贯双侧重复经颅磁刺激(TMS)治疗重度抑郁症的临床结果进行比较。
Brain Stimul. 2022 Mar-Apr;15(2):326-336. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.01.006. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
6
Extension of transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for depression in non-responders: Results of a naturalistic study.经颅磁刺激治疗无反应抑郁症患者的扩展:一项自然研究的结果。
J Psychiatr Res. 2023 Feb;158:314-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.12.038. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
7
Prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression in US military veterans - A naturalistic cohort study in the veterans health administration.美国退伍军人抑郁症的前额叶经颅磁刺激治疗 - 退伍军人健康管理局的自然队列研究。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jan 15;297:671-678. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.025. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
8
Comparison of clinical outcomes with two Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation treatment protocols for major depressive disorder.两种经颅磁刺激治疗方案治疗重度抑郁症的临床疗效比较。
Brain Stimul. 2021 Jan-Feb;14(1):173-180. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.12.003. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
9
Effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice post-FDA approval in the United States: results observed with the first 100 consecutive cases of depression at an academic medical center.美国食品和药物管理局批准后经颅磁刺激在临床实践中的疗效:在学术医疗中心观察到的前 100 例连续抑郁症病例的结果。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;73(4):e567-73. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11m07413.
10
Utilization and outcomes of transcranial magnetic stimulation and usual care for MDD in a large group psychiatric practice.在一个大型精神病学实践中,经颅磁刺激和常规护理用于治疗 MDD 的利用情况和结果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 9;24(1):497. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05928-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Resource utilization and economic outcomes following repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a retrospective observational analysis.重复经颅磁刺激治疗难治性抑郁症后的资源利用和经济结果:一项回顾性观察分析。
J Comp Eff Res. 2025 Jul;14(7):e250019. doi: 10.57264/cer-2025-0019. Epub 2025 Jun 10.
2
Treating Depression With Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Clinician's Guide.重复经颅磁刺激治疗抑郁症:临床医生指南
Am J Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 1;182(6):525-541. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.20240859. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
3
Investigating low intensity focused ultrasound pulsation in anhedonic depression-A randomized controlled trial.
探究低强度聚焦超声脉动治疗快感缺失性抑郁症——一项随机对照试验
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Mar 24;19:1478534. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1478534. eCollection 2025.
4
Neurophysiological approaches for managing pain in multiple sclerosis: a mini review.用于控制多发性硬化症疼痛的神经生理学方法:一篇小型综述。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Feb 28;19:1552435. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1552435. eCollection 2025.
5
Accelerated Theta-Burst Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial.加速性theta波爆发刺激治疗难治性抑郁症:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2025 May 1;82(5):442-450. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.0013.
6
The Role of Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor Polymorphism in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Response for Major Depressive Disorder.脑源性神经营养因子多态性在重度抑郁症经颅磁刺激反应中的作用
J ECT. 2025 Mar 4. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000001123.
7
Brain tumor patient perceptions toward repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for rehabilitation after surgery.脑肿瘤患者对术后康复重复经颅磁刺激的认知
Neurooncol Pract. 2024 Sep 25;12(1):68-75. doi: 10.1093/nop/npae092. eCollection 2025 Feb.
8
Consensus review and considerations on TMS to treat depression: A comprehensive update endorsed by the National Network of Depression Centers, the Clinical TMS Society, and the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology.经抑郁中心国家网络、临床经颅磁刺激学会和国际临床神经生理学联合会认可的关于经颅磁刺激治疗抑郁症的共识性综述与考量:全面更新版
Clin Neurophysiol. 2025 Feb;170:206-233. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.12.015. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
9
A Multisite, 6-Month, Open-Label Study of Maintenance Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Adolescents with Treatment-Resistant Depression.一项针对难治性抑郁症青少年的维持性经颅磁刺激的多中心、6个月开放标签研究。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2025 Mar;35(2):99-108. doi: 10.1089/cap.2024.0067. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
10
Cost-Effectiveness of rTMS as a Next Step in Antidepressant Non-Responders: A Randomized Comparison With Current Antidepressant Treatment Approaches.重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)作为抗抑郁药无反应者下一步治疗方法的成本效益:与当前抗抑郁治疗方法的随机对照比较
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2024 Dec 22;151(5):613-24. doi: 10.1111/acps.13782.