Smolla Marco, Akçay Erol
Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Department of Human Behaviour, Ecology and Culture, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Evol Hum Sci. 2023 Aug 25;5:e26. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2023.21. eCollection 2023.
Humans have adapted to an immense array of environments by accumulating culturally transmitted knowledge and skills. Adaptive culture can accumulate either via more distinct cultural traits or via improvements of existing cultural traits. The kind of culture that accumulates depends on, and coevolves with, the social structure of societies. Here, we show that the coevolution of learning networks and cumulative culture results in two distinct pathways to cultural adaptation: highly connected populations with high proficiency but low trait diversity vs. sparsely connected populations with low proficiency but higher trait diversity. Importantly, we show there is a conflict between group-level payoffs, which are maximised in highly connected groups that attain high proficiency, and individual level selection, which favours disconnection. This conflict emerges from the interaction of social learning with population structure and causes populations to cycle between the two cultural and network states. The same conflict creates a paradox where increasing innovation rate lowers group payoffs. Finally, we explore how populations navigate these two pathways in environments where payoffs differ among traits and can change over time, showing that high proficiency is favoured when payoffs are stable and vary strongly between traits, while frequent changes in trait payoffs favour more trait diversity. Our results illustrate the complex interplay between networks, learning and the environment, and so inform our understanding of human social evolution.
人类通过积累文化传承的知识和技能,适应了各种各样的环境。适应性文化可以通过更多独特的文化特征或现有文化特征的改进来积累。积累的文化类型取决于社会的社会结构,并与之共同进化。在这里,我们表明学习网络和累积文化的共同进化导致了文化适应的两种不同途径:高度连接的群体,熟练程度高但特征多样性低,与连接稀疏的群体,熟练程度低但特征多样性高。重要的是,我们表明在群体层面的收益之间存在冲突,在达到高熟练程度的高度连接群体中收益最大化,而个体层面的选择则有利于断开连接。这种冲突源于社会学习与人口结构的相互作用,导致群体在两种文化和网络状态之间循环。同样的冲突产生了一个悖论,即创新率的提高会降低群体收益。最后,我们探讨了群体在不同特征收益不同且会随时间变化的环境中如何在这两种途径中导航,表明当收益稳定且特征之间差异很大时,高熟练程度更受青睐,而特征收益的频繁变化则有利于更多的特征多样性。我们的结果说明了网络、学习和环境之间复杂的相互作用,从而为我们对人类社会进化的理解提供了信息。