• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于信仰组织环境下的高血压干预措施效果的系统评价和荟萃分析。

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of hypertension interventions in faith-based organisation settings.

机构信息

Centre for Global Health, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Glob Health. 2023 Oct 13;13:04075. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04075.

DOI:10.7189/jogh.13.04075
PMID:37830137
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10570758/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is the global, leading cause of mortality and is the main risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Community-based partnerships can provide cost-saving ways of delivering effective blood pressure (BP) interventions to people in resource-poor settings. Faith-based organisations (FBOs) prove important potential health partners, given their reach and community standing. This potential is especially strong in hard-to-reach, socio-economically marginalised communities. This systematic review explores the state of the evidence of FBO-based interventions on BP management, with a focus on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster RCTs (C-RCTs).

METHODS

Seven academic databases (English = 5, Chinese = 2) and grey literature were searched for C-/RCTs of community-based interventions in FBO settings. Only studies with pre- and post-intervention BP measures were kept for analysis. Random effects models were developed using restricted maximum likelihood estimation (REML) to estimate the population average mean change and 95% confidence interval (CI) of both systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP). The overall heterogeneity was assessed by successively adding studies and recording changes in heterogeneity. Prediction intervals were generated to capture the spread of the pooled effect across study settings.

RESULTS

Of the 19 055 titles identified, only 11 studies of fair to good quality were kept for meta-analysis. Non-significant, average mean differences between baseline and follow-up for the intervention and control groups were found for both SBP (0.78 mm of mercury (mmHg) (95% CI = 2.11-0.55)) and DBP (-0.20 mm Hg (95% CI = -1.16 to 0.75)). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant reduction in SBP of -6.23 mm Hg (95% CI = -11.21 to -1.25) for populations with mean baseline SBP of ≥140 mm Hg.

CONCLUSIONS

The results support the potential of FBO-based interventions in lowering SBP in clinically hypertensive populations. However, the limited evidence was concentrated primarily in Christian communities in the US More research is needed to understand the implications of such interventions in producing clinically meaningful long-term effects in a variety of settings. Further research can illuminate factors that affect success and potential expansion to sites outside the US as well as non-Christian FBOs. Current evidence is inadequate to evaluate the potential of FBO-based interventions in preventing hypertension in non-hypertensive populations. Intervention effects in non-hypertensive population might be better reflected through intermediate outcomes.

摘要

背景

高血压是全球主要的致死原因,也是心血管疾病的主要危险因素。以社区为基础的伙伴关系可以为资源匮乏地区的人们提供节省成本的有效血压(BP)干预措施。鉴于其影响力和社区地位,信仰组织(FBOs)是重要的潜在健康合作伙伴。在难以企及的、社会经济边缘化的社区中,这种潜力尤为强大。本系统评价探讨了基于 FBO 的干预措施在 BP 管理方面的证据现状,重点关注随机对照试验(RCTs)和整群 RCT(C-RCTs)。

方法

在 7 个学术数据库(英文=5,中文=2)和灰色文献中搜索 FBO 环境下基于社区的干预措施的 C-/RCT。仅保留有干预前后 BP 测量值的研究进行分析。使用受限最大似然估计(REML)开发随机效应模型,以估计收缩压和舒张压(SBP 和 DBP)的总体平均变化和 95%置信区间(CI)。通过逐步添加研究并记录异质性变化来评估总体异质性。生成预测区间以捕捉整个研究环境中汇总效果的分布。

结果

在 19055 个标题中,只有 11 项研究质量良好或中等,被保留进行荟萃分析。干预组和对照组的 SBP(0.78 毫米汞柱(mmHg)(95%CI=2.11-0.55))和 DBP(-0.20 毫米汞柱(mmHg)(95%CI=-1.16 至 0.75))的干预前后平均差异均无统计学意义。亚组分析显示,对于平均基线 SBP≥140mmHg 的人群,SBP 显著降低-6.23mmHg(95%CI=-11.21 至-1.25)。

结论

结果支持基于 FBO 的干预措施在降低临床高血压人群 SBP 方面的潜力。然而,有限的证据主要集中在美国的基督教社区。需要进一步的研究来了解这种干预措施在各种环境中产生有临床意义的长期效果的意义。进一步的研究可以阐明影响成功的因素以及在美国以外的地点以及非基督教 FBO 扩大的潜力。目前的证据不足以评估基于 FBO 的干预措施在预防非高血压人群高血压方面的潜力。非高血压人群的干预效果可能通过中间结果更好地反映出来。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9923/10570758/815d4a974ca6/jogh-13-04075-F5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9923/10570758/fdfdaa6e69bd/jogh-13-04075-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9923/10570758/01a72d51b84a/jogh-13-04075-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9923/10570758/3c17073285f3/jogh-13-04075-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9923/10570758/83cb447964a3/jogh-13-04075-F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9923/10570758/815d4a974ca6/jogh-13-04075-F5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9923/10570758/fdfdaa6e69bd/jogh-13-04075-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9923/10570758/01a72d51b84a/jogh-13-04075-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9923/10570758/3c17073285f3/jogh-13-04075-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9923/10570758/83cb447964a3/jogh-13-04075-F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9923/10570758/815d4a974ca6/jogh-13-04075-F5.jpg

相似文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of hypertension interventions in faith-based organisation settings.基于信仰组织环境下的高血压干预措施效果的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Glob Health. 2023 Oct 13;13:04075. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04075.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
4
Mobile phone-based interventions for improving adherence to medication prescribed for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults.基于手机的干预措施,用于提高成年人心血管疾病一级预防中所开药物的依从性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 22;6(6):CD012675. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012675.pub2.
5
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Changes in blood pressure among users of lay health worker or volunteer operated community-based blood pressure programs over time: a systematic review protocol.随着时间推移,由非专业卫生工作者或志愿者运营的社区血压项目使用者的血压变化:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):30-40. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1927.
8
Digital Health Interventions for Hypertension Management in US Populations Experiencing Health Disparities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.数字健康干预措施在管理美国健康差异人群高血压中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e2356070. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.56070.
9
The effect of dietary sodium modification on blood pressure in adults with systolic blood pressure less than 140 mmHg: a systematic review.饮食中钠摄入调整对收缩压低于140 mmHg的成年人血压的影响:一项系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Jun;14(6):196-237. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-002410.
10
Effects of blood-pressure-lowering treatment on outcome incidence in hypertension: 10 - Should blood pressure management differ in hypertensive patients with and without diabetes mellitus? Overview and meta-analyses of randomized trials.降压治疗对高血压患者结局发生率的影响:10 - 糖尿病合并与未合并高血压患者的血压管理是否应有所不同?随机试验的综述与荟萃分析
J Hypertens. 2017 May;35(5):922-944. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001276.

引用本文的文献

1
Approaches to Studying Religion and Public Health: A Narrative Review and Interdisciplinary Framework.研究宗教与公共卫生的方法:一项叙述性综述及跨学科框架
J Relig Health. 2025 Aug 27. doi: 10.1007/s10943-025-02426-z.
2
Cancer interventions with faith-based organizations: a scoping review.与基于信仰的组织开展的癌症干预措施:一项范围综述
Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Mar 4. doi: 10.1007/s10552-025-01977-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the Community-Based Hypertension Management Programs in China.中国社区高血压管理项目评价。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 31;10:896603. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.896603. eCollection 2022.
2
Determining the frequency and level of task-sharing for hypertension management in LMICs: A systematic review and meta-analysis.确定低收入和中等收入国家高血压管理任务分担的频率和水平:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Apr 15;47:101388. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101388. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Health system readiness for non-communicable diseases at the primary care level: a systematic review.
基层医疗保健中非传染性疾病卫生系统准备情况:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 9;12(2):e060387. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060387.
4
The role of trust in health-seeking for non-communicable disease services in fragile contexts: A cross-country comparative study.在脆弱环境中寻求非传染性疾病服务时信任的作用:一项跨国比较研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Dec;291:114473. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114473. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
5
Health Care Delivery Interventions for Hypertension Management in Underserved Populations in the United States: A Systematic Review.美国服务不足人群高血压管理的医疗服务提供干预措施:一项系统评价
Hypertension. 2021 Sep;78(4):955-965. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15946. Epub 2021 Aug 15.
6
Socioeconomic inequalities in blood pressure: co-ordinated analysis of 147,775 participants from repeated birth cohort and cross-sectional datasets, 1989 to 2016.社会经济地位与血压的关系:1989 年至 2016 年重复出生队列和横断面数据集 147775 名参与者的协同分析
BMC Med. 2020 Nov 18;18(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01800-w.
7
The 2020 International Society of Hypertension global hypertension practice guidelines - key messages and clinical considerations.2020 年国际高血压学会全球高血压实践指南——关键信息和临床考虑。
Eur J Intern Med. 2020 Dec;82:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2020.09.001. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
8
A Small-Changes Weight Loss Programfor African-American Church Members.针对非裔美国教会成员的小幅减重计划
Health Behav Policy Rev. 2020 Jul;7(4):279-291. doi: 10.14485/HBPR.7.4.2.
9
Barbershop Management of Hypertension in the African American Population: Pitfalls and Opportunities for Extension to Other Underserved Communities.非裔美国人的理发店高血压管理:向其他服务不足社区推广的陷阱和机会。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2020 Jun 19;22(8):64. doi: 10.1007/s11886-020-01319-9.
10
Blood Pressure and Risks of Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 209 Prospective Studies.血压与认知障碍和痴呆风险:对209项前瞻性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Hypertension. 2020 Jul;76(1):217-225. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.14993. Epub 2020 May 26.