Ogungbe Oluwabunmi, Cazabon Danielle, Ajenikoko Adefunke, Jeemon Panniyammakal, Moran Andrew E, Commodore-Mensah Yvonne
Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Resolve to Save Lives, an initiative of Vital Strategies, New York, NY, USA.
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Apr 15;47:101388. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101388. eCollection 2022 May.
Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) bear a disproportionately higher burden of Cardiovascular Disease (CVD). Team-based care approach adds capacity to improve blood pressure (BP) control. This updated review aimed to test team-based care efficacy at different levels of hypertension team-based care complexity.
We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL for newer articles on task-sharing interventions to manage hypertension in LMICs. Levels of tasks complexity performed by healthcare workers added to the clinical team in hypertension control programs were categorized as administrative tasks (level 1), basic clinical tasks (level 2), and/or advanced clinical tasks (level 3). Meta-analysis using an inverse variance weighted random-effects model summarized trial-based evidence on the efficacy of team-based care on BP control, compared with usual care.
Forty-three RCT articles were included in the meta-analysis: 31 studies from the previous systematic review, 12 articles from the updated search. The pooled mean effect for team-based care was a -4.6 mm Hg (95% CI: -5.8, -3.4, = 80.2%) decrease in systolic BP compared with usual care. We found similar comparative reduction among different levels of team-based care complexity, i.e., administrative and basic clinical tasks (-4.7 mm Hg, 95% CI: -6.8, -2.2; = 79.8%); and advanced clinical tasks (-4.5 mmHg, 95%CI: -6.1, -3.3; = 81%). Systolic BP was reduced most by team-based care involving pharmacists (-7.3 mm Hg, 95% CI: -9.2, -5.4; = 67.2%); followed by nurses (-5.1 mm Hg, 95% CI: -8.0, -2.2; = 72.7%), dieticians (-4.7 mmHg, 95%CI: -7.1, -2.3; = 0.0%), then community health workers (-3.3 mm Hg, 95% CI: -4.8, -1.8; = 77.3%).
Overall, team-based hypertension care interventions consistently contributed to lower systolic BP compared to usual care; the effect size varies by the clinical training of the healthcare team members.
Resolve To Save Lives (RTSL) Vital Strategies, Danielle Cazabon, Andrew E. Moran, Yvonne Commodore-Mensah receive salary support from Resolve to Save Lives, an initiative of Vital Strategies. Resolve to Save Lives is jointly supported by grants from Bloomberg Philanthropies, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and Gates Philanthropy Partners, which is funded with support from the Chan Zuckerberg Foundation.
低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)承担着不成比例的更高的心血管疾病(CVD)负担。基于团队的护理方法增加了改善血压(BP)控制的能力。这项更新的综述旨在测试不同高血压团队护理复杂程度下基于团队的护理效果。
我们在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane和CINAHL中搜索了关于低收入和中等收入国家高血压管理任务分担干预措施的最新文章。在高血压控制项目中加入临床团队的医护人员执行的任务复杂程度分为行政任务(1级)、基本临床任务(2级)和/或高级临床任务(3级)。使用逆方差加权随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,总结了基于团队的护理与常规护理相比在血压控制效果方面基于试验的证据。
荟萃分析纳入了43篇随机对照试验文章:31篇来自之前的系统综述,12篇来自更新搜索。与常规护理相比,基于团队的护理的合并平均效应是收缩压降低4.6毫米汞柱(95%置信区间:-5.8,-3.4,I² = 80.2%)。我们发现在不同程度的基于团队的护理复杂性中,即行政和基本临床任务(-4.7毫米汞柱,95%置信区间:-6.8,-2.2;I² = 79.8%)和高级临床任务(-4.5毫米汞柱,95%置信区间:-6.1,-3.3;I² = 81%)中,有类似的相对降低。涉及药剂师的基于团队的护理使收缩压降低最多(-7.3毫米汞柱,95%置信区间:-9.2,-5.4;I² = 67.2%);其次是护士(-5.1毫米汞柱,95%置信区间:-8.0,-2.2;I² = 72.7%)、营养师(-4.7毫米汞柱,95%置信区间:-7.1,-2.3;I² = 0.0%),然后是社区卫生工作者(-3.3毫米汞柱,95%置信区间:-4.8,-1.8;I² = 77.3%)。
总体而言,与常规护理相比,基于团队的高血压护理干预措施持续有助于降低收缩压;效应大小因医护团队成员的临床培训而异。
“决心拯救生命”(RTSL) 维塔尔策略公司,丹妮尔·卡萨邦、安德鲁·E·莫兰、伊冯娜·康莫多 - 门萨从“决心拯救生命”获得薪资支持,“决心拯救生命”是维塔尔策略公司的一项倡议。“决心拯救生命”由彭博慈善基金会、比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会和盖茨慈善合作伙伴的赠款联合支持,盖茨慈善合作伙伴由陈 - 扎克伯格基金会的支持资助。