University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX.
Duke University Medical Center and Duke Clinical Research Institute Durham NC.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Oct 17;12(20):e030385. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030385. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
Background The ADAPTABLE (Aspirin Dosing: A Patient-Centric Trial Assessing Benefits and Long-Term Effectiveness) was a large, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial that found no difference between high- versus low-dose aspirin for secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Whether concomitant P2Y12 inhibitor therapy modifies the effect of aspirin dose on clinical events remains unclear. Methods and Results Participants in ADAPTABLE were stratified according to baseline use of clopidogrel or prasugrel (P2Y12 group). The primary effectiveness end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke; and the primary safety end point was major bleeding requiring blood transfusions. We used multivariable Cox regression to compare the relative effectiveness and safety of aspirin dose within P2Y12 and non-P2Y12 groups. Of 13 815 (91.6%) participants with available data, 3051 (22.1%) were receiving clopidogrel (2849 [93.4%]) or prasugrel (203 [6.7%]) at baseline. P2Y12 inhibitor use was associated with higher risk of the primary effectiveness end point (10.86% versus 6.31%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.40 [95% CI, 1.22-1.62]) but was not associated with bleeding (0.95% versus 0.53%; adjusted HR, 1.42 [95% CI, 0.91-2.22]). We found no interaction in the relative effectiveness and safety of high- versus low-dose aspirin by P2Y12 inhibitor use. Overall, dose switching or discontinuation was more common in the high-dose compared with low-dose aspirin group, but the pattern was not modified by P2Y12 inhibitor use. Conclusions In this prespecified analysis of ADAPTABLE, we found that the relative effectiveness and safety of high- versus low-dose aspirin was not modified by baseline P2Y12 inhibitor use. Registration https://www.clinical.trials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02697916.
ADAPTABLE(阿司匹林剂量:评估获益和长期有效性的以患者为中心的试验)是一项大型、实用、随机对照试验,该试验未发现高剂量与低剂量阿司匹林在动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病二级预防方面的差异。同时使用 P2Y12 抑制剂治疗是否会改变阿司匹林剂量对临床事件的影响尚不清楚。
ADAPTABLE 参与者根据基线时氯吡格雷或普拉格雷(P2Y12 组)的使用情况进行分层。主要有效性终点是死亡、心肌梗死或中风的复合终点;主要安全性终点是需要输血的大出血。我们使用多变量 Cox 回归比较了 P2Y12 和非 P2Y12 组内阿司匹林剂量的相对有效性和安全性。在有可用数据的 13815 名(91.6%)参与者中,3051 名(22.1%)在基线时正在使用氯吡格雷(2849 名[93.4%])或普拉格雷(203 名[6.7%])。P2Y12 抑制剂的使用与主要有效性终点的风险增加相关(10.86%比 6.31%;调整后的危险比[HR],1.40[95%CI,1.22-1.62]),但与出血无关(0.95%比 0.53%;调整后的 HR,1.42[95%CI,0.91-2.22])。我们没有发现 P2Y12 抑制剂使用与高剂量与低剂量阿司匹林的相对有效性和安全性之间存在交互作用。总体而言,与低剂量阿司匹林相比,高剂量阿司匹林组中更常见剂量转换或停药,但这种模式不受 P2Y12 抑制剂使用的影响。
在 ADAPTABLE 的这项预设分析中,我们发现 P2Y12 抑制剂的基线使用并未改变高剂量与低剂量阿司匹林的相对有效性和安全性。