Kaze Arnaud D, Fonarow Gregg C, Echouffo-Tcheugui Justin B
Department of Medicine University of Maryland Baltimore MD USA.
Ahmanson-UCLA Cardiomyopathy Center Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center Los Angeles CA USA.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Oct 17;12(20):e029814. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.029814. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
Background There is a paucity of large-scale epidemiological studies on the link between cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) and the risk of silent myocardial infarction (SMI) in type 2 diabetes. We evaluated the association between CAN and the risk of SMI in a large sample of adults with type 2 diabetes. Methods and Results Participants with type 2 diabetes from the ACCORD (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes) study without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease at baseline were included. CAN was ascertained using heart rate variability indices calculated from 10-s resting electrocardiograms. The heart rate variability indices included standard deviation of all normal-to-normal R-R intervals and root mean square of successive differences between normal-to-normal R-R intervals. CAN was defined as both the standard deviation of all normal-to-normal R-R intervals and root mean square of successive differences between normal-to-normal R-R intervals less than the fifth percentile of the general population. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to generate hazard ratios (HRs) for incident SMI in relation to CAN measures. Among 4842 participants (mean age, 62.5 years; 46.6% women; 60.2% White), there were 73 incident SMI cases over a median follow-up of 4.9 years (incidence rate 3.1 out of 1000 person-years [95% CI, 2.5-3.9]). After adjusting for confounders, low heart rate variability was associated with a higher risk of SMI (HR, 1.67 [95% CI, 1.02-2.72] and HR, 1.56 [95% CI, 0.94-2.58] for low standard deviation of all normal-to-normal R-R intervals and root mean square of successive differences between normal-to-normal R-R intervals, respectively). Participants with CAN had a 1.9-fold greater risk of SMI (HR, 1.91 [95% CI, 1.14-3.20]). Conclusions In a large cohort of adults with type 2 diabetes, CAN was significantly associated with an increased risk of incident SMI.
关于2型糖尿病中心脏自主神经病变(CAN)与无症状心肌梗死(SMI)风险之间的联系,大规模流行病学研究较少。我们在大量2型糖尿病成年样本中评估了CAN与SMI风险之间的关联。
纳入了来自ACCORD(控制糖尿病心血管风险行动)研究的2型糖尿病参与者,这些参与者在基线时无动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病。使用从10秒静息心电图计算出的心率变异性指标来确定CAN。心率变异性指标包括所有正常R-R间期的标准差以及正常R-R间期之间连续差值的均方根。CAN被定义为所有正常R-R间期的标准差以及正常R-R间期之间连续差值的均方根均低于一般人群的第五百分位数。我们使用Cox比例风险回归来生成与CAN测量相关的新发SMI的风险比(HRs)。在4842名参与者中(平均年龄62.5岁;46.6%为女性;60.2%为白人),在中位随访4.9年期间有73例新发SMI病例(发病率为每1000人年3.1例[95%CI,2.5 - 3.9])。在调整混杂因素后,低心率变异性与更高的SMI风险相关(所有正常R-R间期的低标准差和正常R-R间期之间连续差值的均方根的HR分别为1.67[95%CI,1.02 - 2.72]和1.56[95%CI,0.94 - 2.58])。患有CAN的参与者发生SMI的风险高1.9倍(HR,1.91[95%CI,1.14 - 3.20])。
在一大群2型糖尿病成年人中,CAN与新发SMI风险增加显著相关。