Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
ICES Western, Lawson Health Research Institute, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 13;18(10):e0292899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292899. eCollection 2023.
This retrospective cohort study is the first in North America to examine population-level appropriate antibiotic use for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in older adults, by agent, dose and duration. With the highest rates of CAP reported in the elderly populations, appropriate antibiotic use is essential to improve clinical outcomes. Given the ongoing crisis of antimicrobial resistance, understanding inappropriate antibiotic prescribing is integral to direct community stewardship efforts.
All outpatient primary care visits for CAP (aged ≥65 years) were identified using physician billing codes between January 1 2014 to December 31 2018 in British Columbia (BC) and Ontario (ON). Categories of prescribing were derived from existing literature, and constructed for clinical relevance using Canadian and international guidelines available during the study period. Categories were mutually exclusive and included: guideline adherent (first-line agent, adherent dose/duration), clinically appropriate (non-first line agent, presence of comorbidities), effective but unnecessary (first-line agent, excess dose/duration), undertreatment (first-line agent, subtherapeutic dose/duration), and not recommended (non-first line agent, absence of comorbidities). Proportions of prescribing were examined by category. Temporal trends in prescribing were examined using Poisson regression.
A total of 436,441 episodes of CAP were identified, with 46% prescribed an antibiotic in BC, and 52% in Ontario. Guideline adherent prescribing was minimal for both provinces (BC: 2%; ON: 1%) however the largest magnitude of increase was reported in this category by the final study year (BC-Rate Ratio [RR]: 3.4, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 2.7-4.3; ON-RR: 4.62, 95% CI: 3.4-6.5). Clinically appropriate prescribing accounted for the most antibiotics issued, across all study years (BC: 61%; ON: 74%) (BC-RR: 0.8, 95% CI: 0.8-0.8; ON-RR: 0.9, 95% CI: 0.8-0.9). Excess duration of therapy was the hallmark characteristic for effective but unnecessary prescribing (BC: 92%; ON: 99%). The most common duration prescribed was 7 days, followed by 10. Not recommended prescribing was minimal in both provinces (BC: 4%; ON: 7%) and remained stable by the final study year (BC-RR: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.9-1.2; ON-RR: 0.9, 95% CI: 0.9-1.1).
Three quarters of antibiotic prescribing for CAP was appropriate in Ontario, but only two thirds in BC. Shortening durations-in line with evidence for 3 to 5-day treatment presents a focused target for stewardship efforts.
这是北美第一项针对老年人社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的人群水平适当抗生素使用情况(按药物、剂量和疗程)的回顾性队列研究。由于老年人的 CAP 发病率最高,因此适当使用抗生素对于改善临床结局至关重要。鉴于抗生素耐药性的持续危机,了解不适当的抗生素处方是直接进行社区管理努力的重要组成部分。
在不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC)和安大略省(ON),使用医生计费代码于 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间确定了所有年龄≥65 岁的门诊 CAP 初级保健就诊。处方类别来自现有文献,并根据研究期间可用的加拿大和国际指南构建,以具有临床相关性。类别是互斥的,包括:符合指南(一线药物,符合剂量/疗程)、临床适当(非一线药物,存在合并症)、有效但不必要(一线药物,剂量/疗程过量)、治疗不足(一线药物,低于治疗剂量/疗程)和不推荐(非一线药物,不存在合并症)。按类别检查了处方的比例。使用泊松回归检查了处方的时间趋势。
共确定了 436441 例 CAP 发作,BC 中有 46%开了抗生素处方,ON 中有 52%。两个省都很少有符合指南的处方(BC:2%;ON:1%),但最后一年报告的增加幅度最大(BC-RR:3.4,95%置信区间[CI]:2.7-4.3;ON-RR:4.62,95% CI:3.4-6.5)。在所有研究年份中,临床适当的处方都占了开出处方的大部分(BC:61%;ON:74%)(BC-RR:0.8,95% CI:0.8-0.8;ON-RR:0.9,95% CI:0.8-0.9)。治疗时间过长是有效但不必要的治疗的主要特征(BC:92%;ON:99%)。最常见的处方疗程为 7 天,其次是 10 天。在两个省,不推荐的处方都很少(BC:4%;ON:7%),并在最后一年的研究中保持稳定(BC-RR:1.1,95% CI:0.9-1.2;ON-RR:0.9,95% CI:0.9-1.1)。
安大略省有四分之三的 CAP 抗生素处方是适当的,但不列颠哥伦比亚省只有三分之二。缩短疗程——与 3 至 5 天治疗的证据一致——是管理努力的重点目标。