Suppr超能文献

罗马尼亚脸书评论中新冠疫苗接种叙事的(去)合法化:超越话语策略的共现模式

(De)legitimation of COVID-19 vaccination narratives on Facebook comments in Romania: Beyond the co-occurrence patterns of discursive strategies.

作者信息

Cmeciu Camelia

机构信息

University of Bucharest, Romania.

出版信息

Discourse Soc. 2023 May 26;4(5-29):09579265231174793. doi: 10.1177/09579265231174793.

Abstract

The postmodern medical paradigm has empowered online users in the (de)legitimating process of health-related topics. By employing a co-occurrence analysis, this study identifies the thematic patterns used by Romanian online users in their multimodal comments to the #storiesfromvaccination Facebook campaign run by the Romanian government. The findings show that the commenters assessed source credibility through two thematic patterns: 'source exemplarity' and 'source distrust'. Health experts were more legitimized than laypersons and role models as sources in the COVID-19 vaccination campaign. Two thematic patterns emerged in the assessment of vaccination, namely: 'immunization - past and present challenges' and 'vaccination supporter versus opponent cleavage'. In the discussion on immunization, a polarization between a nostalgic longing for the past and a present corrupted medical and political system prevailed, whereas the important feature of discursive antagonism could be observed in the latter thematic pattern. The co-occurrences of (de)legitimation strategies are explained with reference to the political and medical context, along with the challenges of social media usage in online vaccination communication campaigns.

摘要

后现代医学范式在与健康相关主题的(去)合法化过程中赋予了网络用户权力。通过采用共现分析,本研究确定了罗马尼亚网络用户在对罗马尼亚政府开展的#疫苗接种故事脸书活动的多模态评论中所使用的主题模式。研究结果表明,评论者通过两种主题模式评估信息来源的可信度:“来源典范性”和“来源不信任”。在新冠疫苗接种活动中,健康专家作为信息来源比非专业人士和榜样更具合法性。在疫苗接种评估中出现了两种主题模式,即:“免疫——过去和现在的挑战”以及“疫苗接种支持者与反对者的分歧”。在关于免疫的讨论中,对过去的怀旧渴望与当下腐败的医疗和政治体系之间存在两极分化,而在后一种主题模式中可以观察到话语对抗的重要特征。(去)合法化策略的共现结合政治和医疗背景以及在线疫苗接种宣传活动中社交媒体使用的挑战进行了解释。

相似文献

3
Governmental and public thematic patterns on vaccination during a measles outbreak: the Romanian perspective.
Glob Health Promot. 2021 Sep;28(3):23-31. doi: 10.1177/1757975920973000. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
4
Social media as a platform for health-related public debates and discussions: the Polio vaccine on Facebook.
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2016 Nov 10;5:34. doi: 10.1186/s13584-016-0093-4. eCollection 2016.
5
Public Engagement with Romanian Government Social Media Accounts during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 29;20(3):2372. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032372.
7
It Takes Two to Tango: How the COVID-19 Vaccination Campaign in Israel Was Framed by the Health Ministry vs. the Television News.
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 12;10:887579. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.887579. eCollection 2022.
9
Dangerous agent or saviour? HPV vaccine representations on online discussion forums in Romania.
Int J Behav Med. 2014 Feb;21(1):20-8. doi: 10.1007/s12529-013-9340-z.
10

本文引用的文献

2
In Torlak we (would) trust: domestic vaccine production in contemporary Serbia.
Med Humanit. 2022 Sep;48(3):e11. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2021-012212. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
4
Governmental and public thematic patterns on vaccination during a measles outbreak: the Romanian perspective.
Glob Health Promot. 2021 Sep;28(3):23-31. doi: 10.1177/1757975920973000. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
5
Development of a Codebook of Online Anti-Vaccination Rhetoric to Manage COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 15;18(14):7556. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147556.
6
Transparent communication about negative features of COVID-19 vaccines decreases acceptance but increases trust.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jul 20;118(29). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2024597118. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
7
Social amplification of risk and "probable vaccine damage": A typology of vaccination beliefs in 28 European countries.
Vaccine. 2021 Mar 5;39(10):1508-1515. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.01.063. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
8
Legitimacy and Cosmopolitanism: Online Public Debates on (Corporate) Responsibility.
J Bus Ethics. 2022;176(2):227-240. doi: 10.1007/s10551-020-04703-1. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
9
What do we believe in? Rumors and processing strategies during the COVID-19 outbreak in China.
Public Underst Sci. 2021 Feb;30(2):153-168. doi: 10.1177/0963662520979459. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
10
Repertoires of Vaccine Refusal in Romania.
Vaccines (Basel). 2020 Dec 13;8(4):757. doi: 10.3390/vaccines8040757.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验