Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
Sci Adv. 2023 Oct 13;9(41):eadh8263. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adh8263.
Wildfires are increasing in frequency, raising concerns that smoke can permeate indoor environments and expose people to chemical air contaminants. To study smoke transformations in indoor environments and evaluate mitigation strategies, we added smoke to a test house. Many volatile organic compounds (VOCs) persisted days following the smoke injection, providing a longer-term exposure pathway for humans. Two time scales control smoke VOC partitioning: a faster one (1.0 to 5.2 hours) that describes the time to reach equilibrium between adsorption and desorption processes and a slower one (4.8 to 21.2 hours) that describes the time for indoor ventilation to overtake adsorption-desorption equilibria in controlling the air concentration. These rates imply that vapor pressure controls partitioning behavior and that house ventilation plays a minor role in removing smoke VOCs. However, surface cleaning activities (vacuuming, mopping, and dusting) physically removed surface reservoirs and thus reduced indoor smoke VOC concentrations more effectively than portable air cleaners and more persistently than window opening.
野火发生的频率越来越高,人们担心烟雾会渗透到室内环境中,使人们接触到化学空气污染物。为了研究室内环境中烟雾的转化并评估缓解策略,我们向测试房屋中注入烟雾。许多挥发性有机化合物(VOC)在烟雾注入后的数天内仍然存在,为人类提供了一个更长时间的暴露途径。两个时间尺度控制着烟雾 VOC 的分配:一个较快的时间尺度(1.0 到 5.2 小时)描述了吸附和解吸过程达到平衡的时间,一个较慢的时间尺度(4.8 到 21.2 小时)描述了室内通风超过吸附-解吸平衡以控制空气浓度的时间。这些速率意味着蒸气压控制着分配行为,而房屋通风在去除烟雾 VOC 方面作用较小。然而,表面清洁活动(吸尘、拖地和除尘)可以物理去除表面储层,从而比便携式空气净化器更有效地降低室内烟雾 VOC 浓度,而且持久性更强。