Vichi Alessandro, Zhao Zejiao, Mutahar Mahdi, Paolone Gaetano, Louca Chris
Dental Academy, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2QG, UK.
Dental School, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Materials (Basel). 2023 Sep 27;16(19):6441. doi: 10.3390/ma16196441.
Amid chairside CAD/CAM materials, the use of lithium-based silicate glass-ceramics (LSGC) has been steadily increasing. This review aims to report on the translucency of these materials and the variables used to measure it. An electronic search was performed within the PubMed database within the period between 2 June 2011 and 11 September 2022. English-language papers investigating the translucency of IPS e.max CAD, Celtra Duo, Suprinity PC, Initial LiSi Block, Amber Mill, N!ce, and CEREC Tessera LSGC CAD/blocks were included in the search strategy. After an initial retrieval of 160 papers, the application of exclusion criteria, and the screening of abstracts and then of full texts, 33 papers were included in the study. The retrieved materials, with different degrees of translucency (LT, HT), were IPS e.max CAD (n = 33), Suprinity PC (n = 8), and Celtra Duo (n = 1). Concerning the examined colors, the most used was A2 (n = 20), followed by A1 (n = 8) and A3 (n = 2). The translucency parameter (TP) was the most used method (n = 30) with respect to the contrast ratio (CR) (n = 11) to assess translucency. Five papers measured both. Several specimens' thicknesses (0.5-4 mm) were investigated, with 1 mm (n = 23) being the most frequently analyzed. While a general tendency could be identified, conflicting results among different papers were reported.
在椅旁CAD/CAM材料中,锂基硅酸盐玻璃陶瓷(LSGC)的使用一直在稳步增加。本综述旨在报告这些材料的半透明度以及用于测量它的变量。在2011年6月2日至2022年9月11日期间,在PubMed数据库中进行了电子检索。检索策略中纳入了调查IPS e.max CAD、Celtra Duo、Suprinity PC、Initial LiSi Block、Amber Mill、N!ce和CEREC Tessera LSGC CAD/块半透明度的英文论文。在初步检索到160篇论文后,应用排除标准,筛选摘要,然后筛选全文,33篇论文被纳入研究。检索到的材料具有不同程度的半透明度(LT、HT),分别为IPS e.max CAD(n = 33)、Suprinity PC(n = 8)和Celtra Duo(n = 1)。关于所检查的颜色,最常用的是A2(n = 20),其次是A1(n = 8)和A3(n = 2)。相对于对比度(CR)(n = 11),半透明度参数(TP)是评估半透明度最常用的方法(n = 30)。有五篇论文同时测量了这两个参数。研究了几个不同厚度(0.5 - 4毫米)的样本,其中1毫米(n = 23)是分析最频繁的。虽然可以确定一个总体趋势,但不同论文之间也报告了相互矛盾的结果。