De Pascale Beatrice, Tataranni Piergiorgio, Bonoli Alessandra, Lantieri Claudio
Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering, University of Bologna, 40131 Bologna, Italy.
Materials (Basel). 2023 Oct 3;16(19):6540. doi: 10.3390/ma16196540.
The road and construction sectors consume a large number of natural resources and energy, contributing significantly to waste generation and greenhouse gas emissions (GHG). The use of recycled aggregate from construction and demolition waste as a substitute for virgin aggregate is a current practice in the construction of new road sections. Additionally, in recent years, there has been an increasing focus on finding alternatives to bitumen for binders used in asphalt mixes. This study investigates and compares the impacts associated with two porous asphalt mixtures produced with CDW aggregates, virgin aggregates, and a polyolefin-based synthetic transparent binder through an LCA methodology. A cradle-to-gate approach was employed. Model characterization for calculating the potential environmental impacts of each porous asphalt mixture was performed using the ReCipe 2016 assessment method at the midpoint and endpoint levels. The results are presented with reference to a baseline scenario corresponding to a porous asphalt mixture, confirming the benefits associated with the use of recycled aggregates and in some cases the benefits of not using bitumen-based binders. This work contributes to the understanding of the importance of choosing the least environmentally damaging solution during the production or rehabilitation of road pavement infrastructure.
道路和建筑行业消耗大量自然资源和能源,对废物产生和温室气体排放(GHG)有重大贡献。在新建路段的建设中,目前的做法是使用建筑和拆除废物中的再生骨料替代原生骨料。此外,近年来,人们越来越关注寻找用于沥青混合料的粘结剂中沥青的替代品。本研究通过生命周期评估(LCA)方法,调查并比较了两种由建筑拆除废物(CDW)骨料、原生骨料以及一种聚烯烃基合成透明粘结剂生产的多孔沥青混合料所产生的影响。采用了从摇篮到大门的方法。使用ReCipe 2016评估方法在中点和终点水平上对每种多孔沥青混合料潜在环境影响进行模型表征。结果参照对应多孔沥青混合料的基线情景呈现,证实了使用再生骨料的益处,以及在某些情况下不使用沥青基粘结剂的益处。这项工作有助于理解在道路路面基础设施的生产或修复过程中选择对环境破坏最小的解决方案的重要性。