Department of Immunopathology, Faculty of Medicine, Division of Biomedical Science, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2024 Jan-Jun;20(1):121-134. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2023.2271666. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
Atopic dermatitis (AD) increases the risk of bacterial and viral cutaneous infections. This study assesses the risk of skin infections related to dupilumab monotherapy in moderate-to-severe AD.
We searched PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library. For gray literature, Google Scholar was searched. A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for overall skin infections, eczema herpeticum, nonherpetic skin infections and subgroup meta-analysis based on overall herpetic infection type was performed.
We observed a statistically significant ( < 0.005) lower incidence rate in the dupilumab group compared to placebo for overall skin infections (Risk Ratio [RR] = 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.47, 0.75], < 0.0001) and nonherpetic skin infections (RR = 0.42, 95% CI: [0.27, 0.66], = 0.0001). For herpetic infections in 2b phase studies a meta-analysis demonstrated significantly higher events in dupilumab group compared to placebo (RR = 3.38, 95% CI: [1.98, 5.76], < 0.00001, test for subgroup differences: = 0.02, I = 65.6%).
In moderate-to-severe AD, dupilumab in monotherapy may be an effective and safe therapeutic approach, not associated with an increased risk of overall skin infections and nonherpetic skin infections. Due to the lack of statistical significance in heterogeneity associated with potential confounders in some cases, results should be interpreted cautiously.
The meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO, ID: CRD42023441346.
特应性皮炎(AD)会增加细菌和病毒皮肤感染的风险。本研究评估了中重度 AD 患者接受度普利尤单抗单药治疗相关皮肤感染的风险。
我们检索了 PubMed/Medline、Embase、Web of Science、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 Cochrane 图书馆。对于灰色文献,我们在 Google Scholar 上进行了搜索。对整体皮肤感染、疱疹性湿疹、非疱疹性皮肤感染的随机临床试验(RCT)进行了荟萃分析,并基于整体疱疹感染类型进行了亚组荟萃分析。
与安慰剂相比,度普利尤单抗组的整体皮肤感染(风险比 [RR] = 0.59,95%置信区间 [CI]:[0.47, 0.75], < 0.0001)和非疱疹性皮肤感染(RR = 0.42,95% CI:[0.27, 0.66], = 0.0001)的发生率显著降低( < 0.005)。在 2b 期研究中,对疱疹感染进行荟萃分析表明,度普利尤单抗组的事件发生率明显高于安慰剂组(RR = 3.38,95% CI:[1.98, 5.76], < 0.00001,检验亚组差异: = 0.02,I = 65.6%)。
在中重度 AD 中,度普利尤单抗单药治疗可能是一种有效且安全的治疗方法,不会增加整体皮肤感染和非疱疹性皮肤感染的风险。由于在某些情况下与潜在混杂因素相关的异质性缺乏统计学意义,因此结果应谨慎解释。
该荟萃分析在 PROSPERO 中注册,ID:CRD42023441346。