• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

帕金森病及相关障碍患者预后预测的“意外问题”。

The "Surprise Question" for Prognostication in People With Parkinson's Disease and Related Disorders.

机构信息

Weill Institute for Neurosciences (A.M., N.B.G.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Department of Neurology (Z.A.M., C.S.M., S.S.), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Jan;67(1):e1-e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.10.004. Epub 2023 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.10.004
PMID:37838080
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11068019/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Parkinson's disease and related disorders (PDRD) are fatal neurodegenerative disorders characterized by a fluctuating course that can complicate prognostication. The "surprise question" (SQ: "Would you be surprised if your patient died in the next year?") has been used to identify patients with limited prognosis but has not been assessed in PDRD.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the validity of the SQ in predicting 12-month mortality in PDRD.

METHODS

Data was analyzed from 301 patients and 34 community-based neurologists who were participating in a clinical trial of outpatient palliative care for patients with PDRD. Clinicians answered the SQ for each patient at baseline. Descriptive statistics at baseline, chi-square tests of independence, 2 × 2 and 2 × 3 cross tables were used. Survival analysis compared SQ responses using Kaplan-Meier curves. Risk estimate analyses identified patient characteristics associated with clinicians' responses.

RESULTS

Mortality was 10.3% (N = 31) at 1 year. The sensitivity and specificity of the SQ was 80.7% and 58.9%, respectively with AUC = 0.70, positive predictive value of 18.4% and negative predictive value of 96.4%. Older age, atypical parkinsonism, and dementia were associated with responding "no" to the SQ.

CONCLUSION

The SQ is sensitive to 12-month mortality in PDRD, with a high negative predictive value. The SQ may be useful for identifying patients less likely to die within a year and may be useful for identifying patients with palliative care needs outside of end-of-life care. This latter use may assist in mobilizing early and timely referral to specialist palliative care.

摘要

背景

帕金森病及相关障碍(PDRD)是致命的神经退行性疾病,其病程波动,预测预后较为复杂。“意外问题”(SQ:“如果您的患者在明年内去世,您会感到意外吗?”)已被用于识别预后有限的患者,但尚未在 PDRD 中进行评估。

目的

确定 SQ 预测 PDRD 患者 12 个月死亡率的有效性。

方法

对 301 名患者和 34 名参与 PDRD 门诊姑息治疗临床试验的社区神经科医生进行了数据分析。临床医生在基线时为每位患者回答 SQ。使用基线描述性统计、独立性卡方检验、2×2 和 2×3 交叉表进行分析。生存分析比较了 Kaplan-Meier 曲线的 SQ 反应。风险估计分析确定了与临床医生反应相关的患者特征。

结果

1 年后死亡率为 10.3%(N=31)。SQ 的灵敏度和特异性分别为 80.7%和 58.9%,AUC 为 0.70,阳性预测值为 18.4%,阴性预测值为 96.4%。年龄较大、非典型帕金森病和痴呆与对 SQ 回答“否”相关。

结论

SQ 对 PDRD 12 个月死亡率敏感,阴性预测值高。SQ 可能有助于识别不太可能在一年内死亡的患者,也可能有助于识别需要姑息治疗的患者,而不仅仅是在生命末期护理。后者的使用可能有助于早期和及时转介到专业姑息治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b3f/11068019/e8cb56448114/nihms-1988653-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b3f/11068019/e93fc3aa9d4e/nihms-1988653-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b3f/11068019/e8cb56448114/nihms-1988653-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b3f/11068019/e93fc3aa9d4e/nihms-1988653-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b3f/11068019/e8cb56448114/nihms-1988653-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
The "Surprise Question" for Prognostication in People With Parkinson's Disease and Related Disorders.帕金森病及相关障碍患者预后预测的“意外问题”。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Jan;67(1):e1-e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.10.004. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
2
Usability of the surprise question by nurses to identify 12-month mortality in hospitalized older patients: A prospective cohort study.护士使用惊讶问题识别住院老年患者 12 个月死亡率的可用性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Sep;109:103609. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103609. Epub 2020 May 29.
3
The Surprise Question Can Be Used to Identify Heart Failure Patients in the Emergency Department Who Would Benefit From Palliative Care.“惊讶问题”可用于识别急诊科中需要姑息治疗的心力衰竭患者。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 May;57(5):944-951. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
4
Surprise Question and Performance Status Indicate Urgency of Palliative Care Needs in Patients with Advanced Cancer at the Emergency Department: An Observational Cohort Study.在急诊科有晚期癌症的患者中,意外问题和表现状态提示了舒缓治疗需求的紧迫性:一项观察性队列研究。
J Palliat Med. 2020 Jun;23(6):801-808. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0413. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
5
How Well Does the Surprise Question Predict 1-year Mortality for Patients Admitted with COPD?“惊讶问题”预测 COPD 患者 1 年死亡率的效果如何?
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Sep;36(9):2656-2662. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06512-8. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
6
Palliative Care in Advanced Alzheimer's Disease Dementia: Evaluation of the Answers Given by Caregivers and Physicians to the Accuracy of Surprise Question, as a Prognostic Tool.晚期阿尔茨海默病痴呆症的姑息治疗:评估护理人员和医生对意外问题准确性的回答,作为一种预后工具。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2023 Jun;40(6):624-632. doi: 10.1177/10499091221121328. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
7
Utility of the NECPAL CCOMS-ICO tool and the Surprise Question as screening tools for early palliative care and to predict mortality in patients with advanced chronic conditions: A cohort study.NECPAL CCOMS-ICO 工具和意外问题作为早期姑息治疗的筛选工具以及预测晚期慢性疾病患者死亡率的效用:一项队列研究。
Palliat Med. 2017 Sep;31(8):754-763. doi: 10.1177/0269216316676647. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
8
Prognostic predictors relevant to end-of-life palliative care in Parkinson's disease and related disorders: a systematic review.帕金森病及相关疾病临终姑息治疗的预后预测因素:一项系统综述。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 31;92(6):629-36. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-323939.
9
Using the "Surprise Question" in Nursing Homes: A Prospective Mixed-Methods Study.在养老院使用“惊喜问题”:一项前瞻性混合方法研究。
J Palliat Care. 2018 Jan;33(1):9-18. doi: 10.1177/0825859717745728. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
10
Place of death in Parkinson's disease and related disorders in England and Wales: post-pandemic trends and implications for care planning.英国和威尔士帕金森病及相关疾病患者的死亡地点:后疫情时代的趋势及其对护理计划的影响。
Age Ageing. 2024 Mar 1;53(3). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae048.

引用本文的文献

1
The 'Surprise' Question in Haemato-Oncology: The Estimating Physician and Time to Death Reduce the Prognostic Uncertainty-An Observational Study.血液肿瘤学中的“意外”问题:评估医生与死亡时间可降低预后不确定性——一项观察性研究
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 15;17(8):1326. doi: 10.3390/cancers17081326.
2
The Surprise Question and clinician-predicted prognosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.意外问题与临床医生预测的预后:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 25;15(1):12-35. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2024-004879.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic predictors relevant to end-of-life palliative care in Parkinson's disease and related disorders: a systematic review.帕金森病及相关疾病临终姑息治疗的预后预测因素:一项系统综述。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 31;92(6):629-36. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-323939.
2
Palliative Care for Parkinson Disease.帕金森病的姑息治疗
Clin Geriatr Med. 2020 Feb;36(1):149-157. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2019.09.013. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
3
QuickStats: Age-Adjusted Death Rates* for Parkinson Disease Among Adults Aged ≥65 Years - National Vital Statistics System, United States, 1999-2017.
快速统计数据:1999 - 2017年美国国家生命统计系统中≥65岁成年人帕金森病的年龄调整死亡率*
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Sep 6;68(35):773. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6835a6.
4
Prevalence of Parkinson's disease across North America.北美帕金森病的患病率。
NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2018 Jul 10;4:21. doi: 10.1038/s41531-018-0058-0. eCollection 2018.
5
How accurate is the 'Surprise Question' at identifying patients at the end of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis.“意外问题”在识别临终患者方面的准确性如何?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2017 Aug 2;15(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0907-4.
6
MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease.帕金森病的MDS临床诊断标准。
Mov Disord. 2015 Oct;30(12):1591-601. doi: 10.1002/mds.26424.
7
A clinical overview of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease.帕金森病非运动症状的临床概述
Arch Ital Biol. 2013 Dec;151(4):148-68.
8
Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: prognostic model research.预后研究策略(PROGRESS)3:预后模型研究。
PLoS Med. 2013;10(2):e1001381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001381. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
9
Palliative medicine review: prognostication.姑息医学综述:预后评估
J Palliat Med. 2008 Jan-Feb;11(1):84-103. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2008.9992.
10
Living long in fragile health: the new demographics shape end of life care.在健康脆弱的状态下长寿:新的人口结构塑造临终关怀。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2005 Nov-Dec;Spec No:S14-8. doi: 10.1353/hcr.2005.0096.