Herbell Kayla, Graaf Genevieve
The Ohio State University College of Nursing 1585 Neil Ave Columbus, OH 43210.
The University of Texas at Arlington 701 S. Nedderman Dr Arlington, TX 76019.
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2023 Nov;154. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107148. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
There are well-documented disparities in access to mental health care for children and youth with significant behavioral health needs. Few studies that explored the differential experiences of families who use private vs public sources of financing (i.e., insurance and funding) in accessing residential treatment (RT) for children and youth. This study aimed to examine the lived experiences of families accessing psychiatric residential treatment (RT) and contextualize these experiences based on source of financing.
Twenty parents completed two interviews about their experiences with RT including the process for gaining access, length of stay, and aftercare. Parents were also asked about barriers (e.g., custody relinquishment), and facilitators (e.g., policies in the state) to accessing RT. Data were analyzed using content analysis.
There were three distinct groups of families in the study. The first group includes lower income families whose children had public health coverage before needing RT. The second group comprises middle-income families whose children had private coverage but lived in states where there were no RTs that accepted private insurance or private payment and who did not have the means to send their child to RT in another state. The final group included higher income families with private insurance and enough private resources to overcome the limitations of insurance and state policies. This study illuminates key barriers and hardships for families accessing RT: 1) waiting long waiting periods and navigating complex systems; 2) inadequate lengths of stay; and 3) inadequate aftercare and support in the community transition.
This study is among the first to examine how access to RT differs by whether a family has access to public or private resources. Taken together, these findings support the importance of insurance and financing for families accessing RT for their children and the need for systemic changes in policies and practices to reduce disparities in access.
有充分记录表明,有重大行为健康需求的儿童和青少年在获得心理健康护理方面存在差异。很少有研究探讨使用私人与公共资金来源(即保险和资助)的家庭在为儿童和青少年获得住院治疗(RT)方面的不同经历。本研究旨在考察获得精神病住院治疗(RT)的家庭的实际经历,并根据资金来源对这些经历进行背景分析。
20位家长就他们在RT方面的经历完成了两次访谈,包括获得治疗的过程、住院时间和出院后护理。家长们还被问及获得RT的障碍(如放弃监护权)和促进因素(如该州的政策)。使用内容分析法对数据进行分析。
该研究中有三组不同的家庭。第一组包括低收入家庭,其子女在需要RT之前享有公共医疗保险。第二组包括中等收入家庭,其子女有私人保险,但居住在没有接受私人保险或私人支付的RT机构的州,且他们没有能力将孩子送到另一个州接受RT。最后一组包括高收入家庭,他们有私人保险并有足够的私人资源来克服保险和州政策的限制。本研究揭示了家庭获得RT的关键障碍和困难:1)漫长的等待期和在复杂系统中周旋;2)住院时间不足;3)社区过渡期间出院后护理和支持不足。
本研究是首批考察家庭获得公共或私人资源对获得RT的影响差异的研究之一。综上所述,这些发现支持了保险和资金对家庭为子女获得RT的重要性,以及政策和实践进行系统性变革以减少获得机会差异的必要性。