Sanfey John
Independent, London, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 28;14:1173653. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1173653. eCollection 2023.
The problem of explaining the relationship between subjective experience and physical reality remains difficult and unresolved. In most explanations, consciousness is epiphenomenal, without causal power. The most notable exception is Integrated Information Theory (IIT), which provides a causal explanation for consciousness. However, IIT relies on an identity between subjectivity and a particular type of physical structure, namely with an information structure that has intrinsic causal power greater than the sum of its parts. Any theory that relies on a psycho-phyiscal identity must eventually appeal to panpsychism, which undermines that theory's claim to be fundamental. IIT has recently pivoted towards a strong version of causal emergence, but macroscopic structures cannot be stronger causally than their microphysical parts without some new physical law or governing principle. The approach taken here is designed to uncover such a principle. The decisive argument is entirely deductive from initial premises that are phenomenologically certain. If correct, the arguments prove that conscious experience is sufficient to create additional degrees of causal freedom independently of the content of experience, and in a manner that is unpredictable and unobservable by any temporally sequential means. This provides a fundamental principle about consciousness, and a conceptual bridge between it and the physics describing what is experienced. The principle makes testable predictions about brain function, with notable differences from IIT, some of which are also empirically testable.
解释主观体验与物理现实之间的关系这一问题仍然困难重重且悬而未决。在大多数解释中,意识是附带现象的,没有因果力。最显著的例外是整合信息理论(IIT),它为意识提供了一种因果解释。然而,IIT依赖于主观性与一种特定类型的物理结构之间的同一性,即与一种具有内在因果力大于其各部分之和的信息结构相同一。任何依赖于心物同一性的理论最终都必须诉诸泛心论,这削弱了该理论作为基础理论的主张。IIT最近转向了一种强版本的因果涌现,但如果没有一些新的物理定律或支配原则,宏观结构在因果关系上不可能比其微观物理部分更强。这里采用的方法旨在揭示这样一个原则。决定性的论证完全是从现象学上确定的初始前提演绎而来的。如果正确,这些论证证明有意识的体验足以独立于体验的内容创造额外的因果自由度,并且是以任何时间顺序的方式都无法预测和观察到的方式。这提供了一个关于意识的基本原则,以及意识与描述所体验之物的物理学之间的概念桥梁。该原则对大脑功能做出了可检验的预测,与IIT有显著差异,其中一些差异在经验上也是可检验的。