Suppr超能文献

咖啡因、CYP1A2 基因型与运动表现:系统评价与荟萃分析。

Caffeine, CYP1A2 Genotype, and Exercise Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Applied Physiology and Nutrition Research Group-Center of Lifestyle Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, BRAZIL.

Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, AUSTRALIA.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2024 Feb 1;56(2):328-339. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003313. Epub 2023 Oct 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to summarize and meta-analyze existing evidence regarding the influence of CYP1A2 genotypes on the acute effects of caffeine for exercise performance and to investigate the interaction between genotype, dosage, and timing of caffeine supplementation.

METHODS

Six databases were searched for studies determining the effect of caffeine (except mouth rinsing) on exercise performance between CYP1A2 genotypes. Three-level meta-analyses were performed using standardized mean differences (SMD; Hedge's g ) to determine the effect of caffeine on exercise outcomes within and between CYP1A2 genotypes (AA, AC, and CC). Meta-regressions were performed for dose, timing, and presence of reported conflict of interests (RCOI). A meta-analysis was also performed with placebo values to assess for imbalances between genotypes.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies, totaling 119 outcomes and 440 participants, were included (233 AA, 175 AC, ad 34 CC). Caffeine improved performance for AA (SMD = 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.21-0.39, P < 0.0001) and AC (SMD = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.06-0.25, P = 0.022) but worsened performance for CC (SMD = -0.22, 95% CI = -0.44 to -0.01, P < 0.0001). Dose affected only CC, with greater doses generating more positive SMD (CC-dose estimate: +0.19/1 mg·kg -1 body mass, 95% CI = 0.04-0.33, P = 0.01). Timing influenced only CC, with better performance with later onset of exercise after supplementation (CC-timing estimate: +0.01/min, 95% CI = 0.00-0.02, P = 0.02). RCOI only affected SMD of CC (CC-RCOI estimate: -0.57, 95% CI = -1.02 to -0.12, P = 0.01). After excluding studies with RCOI, no influence of genotype was seen (all P ≥ 0.19). Small, nonsignificant differences were seen in placebo between genotypes (SMD AA vs CC: -0.13; AA vs AC: -0.12; AC vs CC: -0.05; all P ≥ 0.26).

CONCLUSIONS

Caffeine improved performance for AA and AC but worsened performance for CC. Dose and timing moderated the efficacy of caffeine for CC only. Caution is advised because baseline differences and studies with RCOI could have influenced these results.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在总结和荟萃分析现有的关于 CYP1A2 基因型对咖啡因对运动表现的急性影响的证据,并探讨基因型、剂量和咖啡因补充时间的相互作用。

方法

在 CYP1A2 基因型之间,搜索了六个数据库,以确定咖啡因(除漱口外)对运动表现的影响。使用标准化均数差(SMD;Hedge's g)进行三级荟萃分析,以确定咖啡因对运动结果的影响。对剂量、时间和报告的利益冲突(RCOI)进行了荟萃回归分析。还进行了一项安慰剂值的荟萃分析,以评估基因型之间的不平衡。

结果

共纳入 13 项研究,总计 119 项结果和 440 名参与者(233 名 AA、175 名 AC 和 34 名 CC)。咖啡因改善了 AA(SMD=0.30,95%置信区间[CI]为 0.21-0.39,P<0.0001)和 AC(SMD=0.16,95%CI 为 0.06-0.25,P=0.022)的表现,但恶化了 CC(SMD=-0.22,95%CI 为-0.44 至-0.01,P<0.0001)的表现。剂量仅影响 CC,更大的剂量产生更积极的 SMD(CC-剂量估计值:+0.19/1mg·kg-1 体重,95%CI 为 0.04-0.33,P=0.01)。时间仅影响 CC,补充后运动后开始时间较晚时表现更好(CC-时间估计值:+0.01/min,95%CI 为 0.00-0.02,P=0.02)。RCOI 仅影响 CC 的 SMD(CC-RCOI 估计值:-0.57,95%CI 为-1.02 至-0.12,P=0.01)。排除存在 RCOI 的研究后,未见基因型的影响(所有 P≥0.19)。基因型之间在安慰剂上存在小而无统计学意义的差异(AA 与 CC 之间的 SMD:-0.13;AA 与 AC 之间的 SMD:-0.12;AC 与 CC 之间的 SMD:-0.05;所有 P≥0.26)。

结论

咖啡因改善了 AA 和 AC 的表现,但恶化了 CC 的表现。剂量和时间仅调节了咖啡因对 CC 的疗效。由于基线差异和存在 RCOI 的研究可能影响了这些结果,因此应谨慎使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验