Accuracy of lung ultrasound examinations of residual congestion performed by novice residents in patients with acute heart failure.

AIMS

The popularity of B-line-guided congestion assessment by lung ultrasound (LUS) has been increasing. However, the ability of novice residents to detect residual congestion with B-line-guided assessment by LUS after decongestion treatment is poorly understood. In this study, we investigated whether novice residents (no prior echocardiography experience) can acquire the skills for B-line-guided residual congestion assessment and whether the range of variation in assessment is acceptable in actual clinical use.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study included 30 postgraduate first-year novice residents and an expert. The residents underwent training for LUS. At the end of the training session, a set of 15 LUS videos was provided to the residents, and they were asked to estimate the number of B-lines in each video. When the residents' answers greatly differed from the correct answer, we provided feedback to raise awareness of the discrepancies. After the training session, the residents performed residual congestion assessment by LUS after decongestion treatment in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure. The residents identified residual congestion in 57% of the patients. The sensitivity and specificity to identify residual congestion by the residents were 90% and 100%, respectively. The inter-operator agreement between the residents and the expert was substantial (κ = 0.86). The Spearman rank correlation coefficient for the B-lines between the expert and each resident was very high at 0.916 (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

After a brief lecture, novice residents can achieve proficiency in quantifying B-lines on LUS and can reliably identify residual congestion on LUS.