Bassimtabar Ahura, Alfuth Martin
Fachbereich Gesundheitswesen, Hochschule Niederrhein, Reinarzstr. 49, 47805, Krefeld, Deutschland.
Universitäre Weiterbildung M.Sc. Sportphysiotherapie, Deutsche Sporthochschule Köln, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933, Köln, Deutschland.
Schmerz. 2025 Apr;39(2):117-125. doi: 10.1007/s00482-023-00757-y. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
Therapists frequently use the postural-structural-biomechanical (PSB) model in clinical practice to explain the symptom of pain using biomechanical deficits. Adequate knowledge about pain encompasses not only the neurophysiology of pain but also knowledge that existing PSB-oriented explanations of the development and enhancement of pain are outdated. There is no assessment to evaluate physiotherapists' PSB-oriented beliefs about pain.
The aim of the present study was to develop a questionnaire to assess physiotherapists' PSB-oriented beliefs about pain and to evaluate its reliability (internal consistency), validity, and agreement.
The Essential Knowledge of Pain Questionnaire (EKPQ) was constructed on the basis of a literature search and discussions between experts. In a pilot study, 32 pupils of a physiotherapy school were then asked to complete the German version of the revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (rNPQ-D) and the EKPQ using the SoSci Survey in order to assess their knowledge and beliefs about pain.
The internal consistency of the EKPQ was acceptable with a Cronbach's α = 0.784. There was a strong positive significant correlation between the questionnaires (r = 0.518; p = 0.002). The Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean difference of 28.9% (± standard deviation of the difference 15.3%) with an upper limit of 95% agreement of 58.8% and a lower limit of 95% agreement of -1.0% between the questionnaires. Participants achieved a mean score of 60.7% in the rNPQ‑D and a mean score of 31.8% in the EKPQ.
The newly developed EKPQ questionnaire seems to be a reliable and valid assessment to determine physiotherapists' PSB-oriented beliefs about pain. The results also confirm that a high level of knowledge about the neurophysiology of pain does not exclude a PSB orientation. Whether the EKPQ can be used alongside the rNPQ as an additional assessment to evaluate beliefs about pain should be investigated in the future with suitable study designs, e.g. Delphi study.
治疗师在临床实践中经常使用姿势-结构-生物力学(PSB)模型,通过生物力学缺陷来解释疼痛症状。对疼痛的充分了解不仅包括疼痛的神经生理学,还包括现有以PSB为导向的疼痛发生和加重的解释已过时这一知识。目前尚无评估来评价物理治疗师以PSB为导向的疼痛观念。
本研究的目的是开发一份问卷,以评估物理治疗师以PSB为导向的疼痛观念,并评估其信度(内部一致性)、效度和一致性。
基于文献检索和专家讨论构建了疼痛基本知识问卷(EKPQ)。在一项试点研究中,随后要求一所物理治疗学校的32名学生使用SoSci Survey完成修订后的疼痛神经生理学问卷(rNPQ-D)的德文版和EKPQ,以评估他们对疼痛的知识和观念。
EKPQ的内部一致性可以接受,Cronbach's α = 0.784。两份问卷之间存在强的正相关(r = 0.518;p = 0.002)。Bland-Altman分析显示,两份问卷之间的平均差异为28.9%(差异标准差为15.3%),95%一致性上限为58.8%,95%一致性下限为-1.0%。参与者在rNPQ-D中的平均得分为60.7%,在EKPQ中的平均得分为31.8%。
新开发的EKPQ问卷似乎是一种可靠且有效的评估工具,可用于确定物理治疗师以PSB为导向的疼痛观念。结果还证实,对疼痛神经生理学的高度了解并不排除PSB导向。EKPQ是否可以与rNPQ一起用作评估疼痛观念的额外评估工具,未来应通过合适的研究设计进行调查,如德尔菲研究。