Suppr超能文献

射血分数在高危心力衰竭患者中的作用:来自 HELP-HF 登记研究的见解。

Role of ejection fraction in patients at risk for advanced heart failure: insights from the HELP-HF registry.

机构信息

Institute of Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Feb;11(1):136-146. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14539. Epub 2023 Oct 16.

Abstract

AIMS

Patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (EF) (HFrEF), mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF), and preserved EF (HFpEF) may all progress to advanced HF, but the impact of EF in the advanced setting is not well established. Our aim was to assess the prognostic impact of EF in patients with at least one 'I NEED HELP' marker for advanced HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with HF and at least one high-risk 'I NEED HELP' criterion from four centres were included in this analysis. Outcomes were assessed in patients with HFrEF (EF ≤ 40%), HFmrEF (EF 41-49%), and HFpEF (EF ≥ 50%) and with EF analysed as a continuous variable. The prognostic impact of medical therapy for HF in patients with EF < 50% and EF > 50% was also evaluated. All-cause death was the primary endpoint, and cardiovascular death was a secondary endpoint. Among 1149 patients enrolled [mean age 75.1 ± 11.5 years, 67.3% males, 67.6% hospitalized, median follow-up 260 days (inter-quartile range 105-390 days)], HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF were observed in 699 (60.8%), 122 (10.6%), and 328 (28.6%) patients, and 1 year mortality was 28.3%, 26.2%, and 20.1, respectively (log-rank P = 0.036). As compared with HFrEF patients, HFpEF patients had a lower risk of all-cause death [adjusted hazard ratio (HR ) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-0.94, P = 0.022], whereas no difference was noted for HFmrEF patients. After multivariable adjustment, a lower risk of all-cause death (HR for 5% increase 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-0.99, P = 0.017) and cardiovascular death (HR for 5% increase 0.94, 95% CI 0.88-1.00, P = 0.049) was observed at higher EF values. Beta-blockers and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors or sacubitril/valsartan were associated with lower mortality in both EF < 50% and EF ≥ 50% groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with HF and at least one 'I NEED HELP' marker for advanced HF, left ventricular EF is still of prognostic value.

摘要

目的

射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)、轻度射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFmrEF)和射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者均可能进展为晚期心力衰竭,但 EF 在晚期的影响尚未明确。本研究旨在评估至少有一个“我需要帮助”的晚期心力衰竭标志物的心力衰竭患者的 EF 预后影响。

方法和结果

本分析纳入了来自四个中心的至少有一个高危“我需要帮助”标准的心力衰竭患者。在 EF < 50%和 EF > 50%的患者中评估了心力衰竭的医学治疗的预后影响。主要终点为全因死亡,次要终点为心血管死亡。在纳入的 1149 例患者中[平均年龄 75.1 ± 11.5 岁,67.3%为男性,67.6%住院,中位随访 260 天(四分位距 105-390 天)],699 例(60.8%)、122 例(10.6%)和 328 例(28.6%)患者分别为 HFrEF、HFmrEF 和 HFpEF,1 年死亡率分别为 28.3%、26.2%和 20.1%(log-rank P = 0.036)。与 HFrEF 患者相比,HFpEF 患者的全因死亡风险较低[调整后的危险比(HR)0.67,95%置信区间(CI)0.48-0.94,P = 0.022],而 HFmrEF 患者无差异。多变量调整后,EF 值较高与全因死亡风险降低(EF 每增加 5%的 HR 为 0.94,95%CI 0.89-0.99,P = 0.017)和心血管死亡风险降低相关(EF 每增加 5%的 HR 为 0.94,95%CI 0.88-1.00,P = 0.049)。β受体阻滞剂和肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂或沙库巴曲缬沙坦在 EF < 50%和 EF > 50%的两组患者中均与死亡率降低相关。

结论

在至少有一个“我需要帮助”的晚期心力衰竭标志物的心力衰竭患者中,左心室 EF 仍然具有预后价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93f7/10804181/c3f1b1187ce6/EHF2-11-136-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验