Suppr超能文献

心力衰竭住院患者左心室射血分数谱中的治疗滴定。

Uptitrating Treatment After Heart Failure Hospitalization Across the Spectrum of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

机构信息

Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili and Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiologic Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

Université Paris Cité, INSERM UMR-S 942 (MASCOT), Paris, France; Department of Cardiology, Lariboisière University Hospital, AP-HP Nord, Paris, France.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Jun 6;81(22):2131-2144. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.03.426.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute heart failure (AHF) is associated with a poor prognosis regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). STRONG-HF showed the efficacy and safety of a strategy of rapid uptitration of oral treatment for heart failure (HF) and close follow-up (high-intensity care), compared with usual care, in patients recently hospitalized for AHF and enrolled independently from their LVEF.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we sought to assess the impact of baseline LVEF on the effects of high-intensity care vs usual care in STRONG-HF.

METHODS

The STRONG-HF trial enrolled patients hospitalized for AHF with any LVEF and not treated with full doses of renin-angiotensin inhibitors, beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. High-intensity care with uptitration of oral medications was performed independently from LVEF. The primary endpoint was the composite of HF rehospitalization or all-cause death at day 180.

RESULTS

Among the 1,078 patients randomized, 731 (68%) had LVEF ≤40% and 347 (32%) had LVEF >40%. The treatment benefit of high-intensity care vs usual care on the primary endpoint was consistent across the whole LVEF spectrum (interaction P with LVEF as a continuous variable = 0.372). Mean difference in the EQ-5D visual analog scale change from baseline to day 90 between treatment arms was slightly greater at higher LVEF values, but with no interaction between LVEF as a continuous variable and the treatment strategy (interaction P = 0.358). Serious adverse events were also independent from LVEF.

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid uptitration of oral medications for HF and close follow-up reduce 180-day death and HF rehospitalization after AHF hospitalization independently from LVEF. (Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Rapid Optimization, Helped by NT-ProBNP Testing, of Heart Failure Therapies [STRONG-HF]; NCT03412201).

摘要

背景

急性心力衰竭(AHF)与预后不良相关,无论左心室射血分数(LVEF)如何。STRONG-HF 研究表明,与常规治疗相比,对于近期因 AHF 住院且 LVEF 独立于 STRONG-HF 研究入组的患者,快速滴定口服心力衰竭(HF)治疗药物并密切随访(强化治疗)的策略具有疗效和安全性。

目的

本研究旨在评估基线 LVEF 对强化治疗与常规治疗效果的影响。

方法

STRONG-HF 试验纳入了任何 LVEF 且未接受肾素-血管紧张素抑制剂、β受体阻滞剂和盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂充分剂量治疗的 AHF 住院患者。独立于 LVEF 进行口服药物滴定的强化治疗。主要终点是 180 天内 HF 再住院或全因死亡的复合终点。

结果

在随机分组的 1078 例患者中,731 例(68%)LVEF≤40%,347 例(32%)LVEF>40%。强化治疗与常规治疗在主要终点的疗效在整个 LVEF 范围内一致(与 LVEF 作为连续变量的交互 P 值=0.372)。从基线到 90 天,治疗组间 EQ-5D 视觉模拟量表变化的平均值差异在较高 LVEF 值时稍大,但 LVEF 作为连续变量与治疗策略之间无交互作用(交互 P 值=0.358)。严重不良事件也与 LVEF 无关。

结论

快速滴定 HF 口服药物并密切随访可降低 AHF 住院后 180 天的死亡率和 HF 再住院率,且与 LVEF 无关。(快速优化、NT-proBNP 检测辅助的心力衰竭治疗的安全性、耐受性和疗效[STRONG-HF];NCT03412201)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验