Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins Center for Humanitarian Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Glob Health Action. 2023 Dec 31;16(1):2258711. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2258711. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
Infection prevention and control (IPC) was a central component of the Democratic Republic of the Congo's COVID-19 response in 2020, aiming to prevent infections and ensure safe health service provision.
We aimed to assess the evolution of IPC capacity in 65 health facilities supported by Action Contre la Faim in three health zones in Kinshasa (Binza Meteo (BM), Binza Ozone (BO), and Gombe), investigate how triage and alert validation were implemented, and estimate how health service utilisation changed in these facilities (April-December 2020).
We used three datasets: IPC Scorecard data assessing health facilities' IPC capacity at baseline, monthly and weekly triage data, and monthly routine data on eight health services. We examined factors associated with triage and isolation capacity with a mixed-effects negative binomial model and estimated changes in health service utilisation with a mixed-model with random intercept and long-term trend for each health facility. We reported incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for level change when the pandemic began, for trend change, and for lockdown and post-lockdown periods (Gombe). We estimated cumulative and monthly percent differences with expected consultations.
IPC capacity reached an average score of 90% by the end of the programme. A one-point increase in the IPC score was associated with +6% and +5% increases in triage capacity in BO and Gombe, respectively, and with +21% and +10% increases in isolation capacity in the same zones. When the pandemic began, decreases were seen in outpatient consultations (IRR: 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.48-0.95] BM&BO-combined; IRR: 0.29, 95%CI [0.16-0.53] Gombe), consultations for respiratory tract infections (IRR: 0.48, 95%CI [0.28-0.87] BM&BO-combined), malaria (IRR: 0.60, 95%CI [0.43-0.84] BM&BO-combined, IRR: 0.33, 95%CI [0.18-0.58] Gombe), and vaccinations (IRR: 0.27, 95%CI [0.10-0.71] Gombe). Maternal health services decreased in Gombe (ANC1: IRR: 0.42, 95%CI [0.21-0.85]).
The effectiveness of the triage and alert validation process was affected by the complexity of implementing a broad clinical definition in limited-resource settings with a pre-pandemic epidemiological profile characterised by infectious diseases with symptoms like COVID-19. Readily available testing capacity remains key for future pandemic response to improve the disease understanding and maintain health services.
2020 年,刚果民主共和国的 COVID-19 应对措施的核心是感染预防和控制(IPC),旨在预防感染并确保安全的卫生服务提供。
我们旨在评估在金沙萨三个卫生区(Binza Meteo(BM)、Binza Ozone(BO)和 Gombe)由 Action Contre la Faim 支持的 65 个卫生设施的 IPC 能力的演变情况,调查分诊和警报验证的实施情况,并估计这些设施的卫生服务利用情况如何变化(2020 年 4 月至 12 月)。
我们使用了三个数据集:IPC 记分卡数据评估卫生设施在基线、每月和每周分诊数据以及每月八项卫生服务常规数据时的 IPC 能力。我们使用混合效应负二项式模型检查与分诊和隔离能力相关的因素,并为每个卫生设施使用具有随机截距和长期趋势的混合模型估计卫生服务利用的变化。我们报告了大流行开始时、趋势变化时以及封锁和封锁后期间(Gombe)的水平变化的发病率比(IRR)。我们估计了累积百分比差异和每月预期咨询百分比差异。
IPC 能力在项目结束时达到了平均 90%的得分。IPC 评分提高 1 分,与 BO 和 Gombe 地区的分诊能力分别提高 6%和 5%以及相同地区的隔离能力提高 21%和 10%相关。大流行开始时,门诊咨询量减少(IRR:0.67,95%置信区间(CI)[0.48-0.95] BM&BO 联合;IRR:0.29,95%CI [0.16-0.53] Gombe)、呼吸道感染咨询量减少(IRR:0.48,95%CI [0.28-0.87] BM&BO 联合,IRR:0.60,95%CI [0.43-0.84] BM&BO 联合,IRR:0.33,95%CI [0.18-0.58] Gombe)、疟疾咨询量减少(IRR:0.60,95%CI [0.43-0.84] BM&BO 联合,IRR:0.33,95%CI [0.18-0.58] Gombe)和疫苗接种量减少(IRR:0.27,95%CI [0.10-0.71] Gombe)。在 Gombe,孕产妇保健服务减少(ANC1:IRR:0.42,95%CI [0.21-0.85])。
分诊和警报验证过程的有效性受到在资源有限的环境中实施广泛临床定义的复杂性的影响,该环境的大流行前流行病学特征以具有 COVID-19 样症状的传染病为特征。现成的检测能力仍然是未来大流行应对的关键,以提高对疾病的认识并维持卫生服务。