Biswas Md Abdullah Al Jubayer, Adams Scott J, Xing Li, Mondal Prosanta, Szafron Michael
Collaborative Biostatistics Program, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Department of Medical Imaging, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
J Glob Health. 2025 Jul 21;15:04205. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04205.
Despite the significant morbidity and mortality caused by healthcare-associated infections worldwide, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), there is a lack of understanding of the readiness to apply standard precautions for infection prevention and control (IPC) in healthcare facilities across different LMICs.
We analysed nationally representative health system data from the Service Provision Assessment surveys for six selected LMICs - Afghanistan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, Nepal, Senegal, and Bangladesh. We recorded seven tracer items of standard precautions into binary elements. We calculated a readiness index based on the World Health Organization's Service Availability and Readiness Assessment manual. We utilised survey-weighted multivariable generalised estimating equations to identify factors associated with the readiness index.
Among 6054 healthcare facilities, 55% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 53.1, 56.5) of necessary standard precautions were available, ranging from 48.1% in the Democratic Republic of the Congo to 65% in Nepal. Readiness varied by service area, with the tuberculosis service area being the least prepared at 38% and the general outpatient service area being the most prepared at 66%. Facilities in Nepal and the urban regions showed higher readiness, with mean (x̄) differences of 16% (95% CI = 13.6, 17.9) and 3% (95% CI = 1.8, 4.9) compared to the Democratic Republic of the Congo and rural areas, respectively.
We revealed significant deficiencies in standard precautions within healthcare facilities across six LMICs, notably in rural areas. The findings underscore an urgent need for targeted interventions to improve IPC strategies, particularly in domains like tuberculosis care.
尽管全球范围内医疗保健相关感染导致了严重的发病率和死亡率,尤其是在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),但对于不同LMICs的医疗机构应用标准预防措施进行感染预防与控制(IPC)的准备情况缺乏了解。
我们分析了来自六个选定LMICs(阿富汗、刚果民主共和国、海地、尼泊尔、塞内加尔和孟加拉国)的服务提供评估调查中的具有全国代表性的卫生系统数据。我们将标准预防措施的七个追踪项目记录为二元元素。我们根据世界卫生组织的服务可用性和准备情况评估手册计算了一个准备指数。我们使用调查加权多变量广义估计方程来确定与准备指数相关的因素。
在6054个医疗机构中,55%(95%置信区间(CI)=53.1,56.5)的必要标准预防措施可用,范围从刚果民主共和国的48.1%到尼泊尔的65%。准备情况因服务领域而异,结核病服务领域准备最差,为38%,普通门诊服务领域准备最充分,为66%。尼泊尔和城市地区的医疗机构准备情况较高,与刚果民主共和国和农村地区相比,平均(x̄)差异分别为16%(95%CI=13.6,17.9)和3%(95%CI=1.8,4.9)。
我们揭示了六个LMICs的医疗机构在标准预防措施方面存在重大缺陷,特别是在农村地区。研究结果强调迫切需要有针对性的干预措施来改善IPC策略,特别是在结核病护理等领域。