Department of Pediatrics.
Health Sciences Libraries, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York.
Pediatrics. 2023 Nov 1;152(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2023-061572.
Children with medical complexity (CMC) are at risk for adverse outcomes after discharge. Difficulties with comprehension of and adherence to discharge instructions contribute to these errors. Comprehensive reviews of patient-, caregiver-, provider-, and system-level characteristics and interventions associated with discharge instruction comprehension and adherence for CMC are lacking.
To systematically review the literature related to factors associated with comprehension of and adherence to discharge instructions for CMC.
PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycInfo, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science (database initiation until March 2023), and OAIster (gray literature) were searched.
Original studies examining caregiver comprehension of and adherence to discharge instructions for CMC (Patient Medical Complexity Algorithm) were evaluated.
Two authors independently screened titles/abstracts and reviewed full-text articles. Two authors extracted data related to study characteristics, methodology, subjects, and results.
Fifty-one studies were included. More than half were qualitative or mixed methods studies. Few interventional studies examined objective outcomes. More than half of studies examined instructions for equipment (eg, tracheostomies). Common issues related to access, care coordination, and stress/anxiety. Facilitators included accounting for family context and using health literacy-informed strategies.
No randomized trials met inclusion criteria. Several groups (eg, oncologic diagnoses, NICU patients) were not examined in this review.
Multiple factors affect comprehension of and adherence to discharge instructions for CMC. Several areas (eg, appointments, feeding tubes) were understudied. Future work should focus on design of interventions to optimize transitions.
患有复杂疾病的儿童(CMC)在出院后有发生不良后果的风险。对出院指导的理解和遵守困难导致了这些错误。目前缺乏对与 CMC 出院指导理解和遵守相关的患者、照顾者、提供者和系统层面特征和干预措施的综合审查。
系统回顾与 CMC 出院指导理解和遵守相关的文献,评估相关因素。
检索了 PubMed/Medline、Embase、Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库、PsycInfo、护理学及相关健康文献累积索引、Web of Science(数据库起始于 2023 年 3 月)和 OAIster(灰色文献)。
评估了对 CMC(患者医疗复杂性算法)照顾者对出院指导理解和遵守的原始研究。
两位作者独立筛选标题/摘要和全文文章。两位作者提取了与研究特征、方法、研究对象和结果相关的数据。
共纳入 51 项研究。超过一半的研究是定性或混合方法研究。很少有干预性研究检查了客观结果。超过一半的研究检查了设备(例如,气管造口术)的使用说明。常见问题与获取、护理协调以及压力/焦虑有关。促进因素包括考虑家庭背景和使用健康素养知情策略。
没有符合纳入标准的随机试验。本综述未检查几个群体(例如,肿瘤诊断、NICU 患者)。
多种因素影响 CMC 出院指导的理解和遵守。几个领域(例如,预约、喂养管)的研究不足。未来的工作应重点设计干预措施,以优化过渡。