Suppr超能文献

血管内机械血栓切除术与溶栓治疗髂股深静脉血栓形成患者的疗效比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy versus thrombolysis in patients with iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Angiology Clinic, Venous Center Klinikum Arnsberg, Arnsberg, Germany.

Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Vasa. 2021 Jan;50(1):59-67. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000875. Epub 2020 May 25.

Abstract

This study sought to compare effectiveness and safety of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) and thrombolysis alone (THR) in patients with acute or subacute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (IfDVT). Observational and randomized trials, published between January 2001 to February 2019 were identified by searching MEDLINE. Studies on deep venous thrombosis (DVT) treated with either THR or PMT adjunctive to conventional anticoagulation and compressive intervention were included. Meta-analysis of proportions was conducted to assess effectiveness outcomes of successful lysis and primary patency, post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), valvular reflux, recurrent DVT, as well as safety outcomes of major bleeding, hematuria, and pulmonary embolism. Of 77 identified records, 17 studies including 1417 patients were eligible. Pooled proportion of successful lysis was similar between groups (THR: 95 % [I = 68.4 %], PMT 96 %, [I = 0 %]; Q [Cochran's Q between groups] 0.3, p = 0.61). However, pooled proportion of 6-month primary patency was lower after THR than after PMT (68 % [I = 15.6 %] versus 94 %; Q 26.4, p < 0.001). Considerable heterogeneity within groups did not allow for between-group comparison of PTS and recurrent DVT. Major bleeding was more frequent after THR than after PMT (6.0 % [I = 0 %] versus 1.0 % [I = 0 %]; Q 12.3, p < 0.001). Incidence of hematuria was lower after THR as compared to PMT (2 % [I = 56 %] versus 91.3 % [I = 91.7 %]; Q 714, p < 0.001). Incidences of valvular reflux and pulmonary embolism were similar across groups (THR: 61 % versus PMT: 53 %; Q 0.7, p = 0.39 and THR: 2 % versus PMT: 1 %; Q 1.1, p = 0.30, respectively). In patients with iliofemoral DVT, percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy was associated with a higher cumulative 6-month primary patency and a lower incidence of major bleeding compared to thrombolysis alone. Risk of hemolysis from mechanical thrombectomy needs further consideration.

摘要

本研究旨在比较急性或亚急性髂股深静脉血栓形成(IfDVT)患者行经皮机械血栓切除术(PMT)与单独溶栓(THR)的有效性和安全性。通过检索 MEDLINE 数据库,收集 2001 年 1 月至 2019 年 2 月期间发表的观察性和随机试验。纳入接受 THR 或 PMT 联合常规抗凝和压迫干预治疗的深静脉血栓形成(DVT)研究。采用合并比例进行荟萃分析,以评估成功溶栓和主要通畅率、血栓后综合征(PTS)、瓣膜反流、复发性 DVT 的有效性结局,以及大出血、血尿和肺栓塞的安全性结局。在 77 项确定的记录中,有 17 项研究共纳入 1417 例患者符合条件。两组间成功溶栓的合并比例相似(THR:95%[I=68.4%],PMT:96%[I=0%];Q[组间 Cochran Q]0.3,p=0.61)。然而,THR 后 6 个月主要通畅率的合并比例低于 PMT(68%[I=15.6%]比 94%;Q 26.4,p<0.001)。组内存在较大的异质性,不允许进行 PTS 和复发性 DVT 的组间比较。THR 后大出血的发生率高于 PMT(6.0%[I=0%]比 1.0%[I=0%];Q 12.3,p<0.001)。与 PMT 相比,THR 后血尿的发生率较低(2%[I=56%]比 91.3%[I=91.7%];Q 714,p<0.001)。两组间瓣膜反流和肺栓塞的发生率相似(THR:61%比 PMT:53%;Q 0.7,p=0.39 和 THR:2%比 PMT:1%;Q 1.1,p=0.30)。在髂股深静脉血栓形成患者中,与单独溶栓相比,经皮机械血栓切除术具有更高的累积 6 个月主要通畅率和较低的大出血发生率。机械血栓切除术引起溶血的风险需要进一步考虑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验