Biologic Therapy Center, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Warsaw, Poland.
Department of Connective Tissue Diseases, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Spartańska 1, 02-637, Warsaw, Poland.
Rheumatol Int. 2024 Feb;44(2):357-362. doi: 10.1007/s00296-023-05481-5. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
The popularity of esthetic medicine is growing every year, also among patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIRD). The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of esthetic medicine (AM) procedures in patients with AIRD. A semi-structured, anonymous questionnaire regarding rheumatic and concomitant diseases and AM procedures was distributed among adult patients hospitalized in the rheumatology department or attending outpatient clinic in the National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology, and Rehabilitation, Warsaw. The main outcome was the occurrence of an adverse event. A number of 512 patients took part in the survey and 15 were excluded (AM procedure preceded the diagnosis of AIRD). The study group consisted of 497 patients, of whom 47 had undergone AM procedures. The procedures performed included: tattooing (22 patients), piercing (16 patients), hyaluronic acid (7 patients), botulinum toxin (5 patients) injections, laser procedures (6 patients), plastic surgery (4 patients), mesotherapy (3 patients) and others. The vast majority of patients had these performed during remission or low disease activity. 70.2% of patients received treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) during the AM procedure, with TNF-alfa inhibitors being the most common (63.6%). Adverse events occurred in 15% of patients. All were mild and transient site reactions. Most patients would like to repeat the AM procedure in the future. The use of esthetic medicine procedures in patients with AIRD, including those treated with biologic DMARDs, was associated with a risk of mild site reactions. Most of the patients expressed satisfaction with the results of the AM procedure.
美容医学的受欢迎程度每年都在增长,在自身免疫性炎症性风湿病(AIRD)患者中也是如此。本研究的目的是评估美容医学(AM)程序在 AIRD 患者中的安全性。一项关于风湿病和合并症以及 AM 程序的半结构化、匿名问卷分发给了在华沙国家老年病学、风湿病学和康复研究所住院的成年患者或在门诊就诊的患者。主要结果是不良事件的发生。共有 512 名患者参加了调查,其中 15 名被排除(AM 程序先于 AIRD 诊断)。研究组包括 497 名患者,其中 47 名患者接受了 AM 程序。进行的程序包括:纹身(22 名患者)、穿孔(16 名患者)、透明质酸(7 名患者)、肉毒杆菌毒素(5 名患者)注射、激光治疗(6 名患者)、整形手术(4 名患者)、中胚层疗法(3 名患者)和其他。绝大多数患者在缓解期或疾病活动度低时进行这些治疗。70.2%的患者在 AM 手术期间接受了疾病修饰抗风湿药物(DMARDs)治疗,其中最常见的是 TNF-alfa 抑制剂(63.6%)。15%的患者出现了不良事件。所有这些都是轻微的和短暂的部位反应。大多数患者希望将来再次接受 AM 手术。在 AIRD 患者中使用美容医学程序,包括使用生物 DMARDs 的患者,与轻度部位反应的风险相关。大多数患者对 AM 程序的结果表示满意。