Pabbla Amandeep, Agyemang Charles, van der Heijden Geert, Duijster Denise
Department of Oral Public Health, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and VU University, Gustav Mahlerlaan 3004, Amsterdam, 1081 LA, The Netherlands.
Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Immigr Minor Health. 2024 Apr;26(2):325-333. doi: 10.1007/s10903-023-01553-7. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
The aim of this study was to assess the oral health status, oral health behaviours and oral healthcare utilization among Indian migrants living in the Netherlands and how they compare with the host population. Based on a random sample from Dutch municipalities, cross-sectional data were obtained for the Indian migrants living in the Netherlands (n = 148) and the host population (n = 244). A questionnaire was used to collect information on socio-demographic, self-reported oral health status, oral health behaviours and oral healthcare utilization. The distribution of self-reported oral health variables for both groups were tabulated and compared using logistic, ordinal and multinomial regression analysis. When adjusted for covariates such as age, gender, marital status, education, income, occupation and dental insurance, regression analysis for oral health status showed that the odds of reporting oral impact on daily performances (OIDP) was 5.87 times higher for Indians compared to the host population (95%CI:3.45;9.65). In contrast, the odds of Indians reporting bleeding gums [OR = 0.44 (95%CI:0.27;0.73)] and diagnosed with gum diseases [OR = 0.23(95%CI:0.13;0.39)] were lower than the host population. Also, the odds of consuming alcohol and cakes or chocolates was significantly lower among Indian migrants compared to the host population [(OR = 0.15(95%CI:0.09;0.25)] and [OR = 0.33(95%CI:0.21;0.52)], respectively. But the odds of consuming sugar in hot beverages were significantly higher among Indians [OR = 10.44(95%CI:5.99;18.19)]. The odds of Indians visiting a dental professional were 9.22 times (95%CI:4.62;18.40) lower compared to the host population. We found that oral health status and behaviours among Indian migrants were different in certain aspects compared to the host population. However, their oral healthcare utilization remained overall lower. The underlying determinants for such observations merit further research. Migrant friendly approach from both the dental professionals and policy makers can encourage dental visits and improve the utilization patterns among Indians migrants in the future.
本研究的目的是评估居住在荷兰的印度移民的口腔健康状况、口腔健康行为及口腔医疗服务利用情况,以及他们与当地居民的比较情况。基于荷兰各市镇的随机样本,获取了居住在荷兰的印度移民(n = 148)和当地居民(n = 244)的横断面数据。使用问卷收集社会人口学、自我报告的口腔健康状况、口腔健康行为及口腔医疗服务利用方面的信息。将两组自我报告的口腔健康变量分布制成表格,并使用逻辑回归、有序回归和多项回归分析进行比较。在对年龄、性别、婚姻状况、教育程度、收入、职业和牙科保险等协变量进行调整后,口腔健康状况的回归分析表明,印度人报告口腔对日常表现有影响(OIDP)的几率比当地居民高5.87倍(95%CI:3.45;9.65)。相比之下,印度人报告牙龈出血[OR = 0.44(95%CI:0.27;0.73)]和被诊断患有牙龈疾病[OR = 0.23(95%CI:0.13;0.39)]的几率低于当地居民。此外,印度移民中饮酒以及食用蛋糕或巧克力的几率分别显著低于当地居民[(OR = 0.15(95%CI:0.09;0.25)]和[OR = 0.33(95%CI:0.21;0.52)]。但印度人在热饮中加糖的几率显著更高[OR = 10.44(95%CI:5.99;18.19)]。印度人拜访牙科专业人员的几率比当地居民低9.22倍(95%CI:4.62;18.40)。我们发现,印度移民的口腔健康状况和行为在某些方面与当地居民不同。然而,他们的口腔医疗服务利用总体上仍然较低。这些观察结果的潜在决定因素值得进一步研究。牙科专业人员和政策制定者采取对移民友好的方法可以鼓励印度移民看牙,并在未来改善其利用模式。