Zhang Qin, Li Yan-Xia, Li Xue-Lian, Yin Yan, Li Rui-Lan, Qiao Xin, Li Wei, Ma Hai-Feng, Ma Wen-Hui, Han Yu-Feng, Zeng Guang-Qiao, Wang Qiu-Yue, Kang Jian, Hou Gang
Institute of Respiratory Disease, First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China,
Department of Respiratory Medicine, First Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Sep 10;13:2833-2839. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S173509. eCollection 2018.
The sit-to-stand test (STST) has been used to evaluate the exercise tolerance of patients with COPD. However, mutual comparisons to predict poor exercise tolerance have been hindered by the variety of STST modes used in previous studies, which also did not consider patients' subjective perceptions of different STST modes. Our aim was to compare the five-repetition sit-to-stand test (5STS) with the 30-second sit-to-stand test (30STS) for predicting poor performance in the six-minute walking test and to evaluate patients' subjective perceptions to determine the optimal mode for clinical practice.
Patients with stable COPD performed 5STS, 30STS and the 6MWT and then evaluated their feelings about the two STST modes by Borg dyspnea score and a questionnaire. Moreover, we collected data through the pulmonary function test, mMRC dyspnea score, COPD assessment test and quadriceps muscle strength (QMS). A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the 5STS and 30STS results was used to predict 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) <350 m.
The final analysis included 128 patients. Similar moderate correlations were observed between 6MWT and 5STS (=-0.508, <0.001) and between 6MWT and 30STS (=0.528, <0.001), and there were similar correlations between QMS and 5STS (=-0.401, <0.001) and between QMS and 30STS (=0.398, <0.001). The 5STS and 30STS score cutoffs produced sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of 76.0%, 62.8%, 56.7% and 80.3% (5STS) and 62.0%, 75.0%, 62.0% and 75.0% (30STS), respectively, for predicting poor 6MWT performance. The 5STS exhibited obvious superiority in terms of the completion rate and the subjective feelings of the participants.
As a primary screening test for predicting poor 6MWD, the 5STS is similar to the 30STS in terms of sensitivity and specificity, but the 5STS has a better patient experience.
坐立试验(STST)已被用于评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的运动耐力。然而,先前研究中使用的多种STST模式阻碍了对预测运动耐力差的相互比较,而且这些研究也未考虑患者对不同STST模式的主观感受。我们的目的是比较五次坐立试验(5STS)和30秒坐立试验(30STS)在预测六分钟步行试验中表现不佳方面的差异,并评估患者的主观感受,以确定临床实践的最佳模式。
稳定期COPD患者进行5STS、30STS和6分钟步行试验(6MWT),然后通过Borg呼吸困难评分和问卷评估他们对两种STST模式的感受。此外,我们通过肺功能测试、改良英国医学研究委员会(mMRC)呼吸困难评分、COPD评估测试和股四头肌力量(QMS)收集数据。使用5STS和30STS结果的受试者工作特征曲线分析来预测6分钟步行距离(6MWD)<350米。
最终分析纳入128例患者。6MWT与5STS之间(r = -0.508,P < 0.001)以及6MWT与30STS之间(r = 0.528,P < 0.001)观察到相似的中度相关性,QMS与5STS之间(r = -0.401,P < 0.001)以及QMS与30STS之间(r = 0.398,P < 0.001)也有相似的相关性。对于预测6MWT表现不佳,5STS和30STS的评分临界值分别产生了76.0%、62.8%、56.7%和80.3%(5STS)以及62.0%、75.0%、62.0%和75.0%(30STS)的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值。5STS在完成率和参与者的主观感受方面表现出明显优势。
作为预测6MWD不佳的初步筛查试验,5STS在敏感性和特异性方面与30STS相似,但5STS的患者体验更好。