Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 1;81(3):250-259. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.3971.
Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is one of the most common mental disorders in adults. Psychotherapies are among the most recommended treatments for GAD, but which should be considered as first-line treatment needs to be clarified.
To use a network meta-analysis to examine the short- and long-term associations of different psychotherapies with outcomes of effectiveness and acceptability in adults with GAD.
MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials were searched from database inception to January 1, 2023, to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of psychotherapies for adults with GAD.
RCTs comparing any type of psychotherapy against another or with a control condition for the treatment of adults (≥18 years, both sexes) with a primary diagnosis of GAD were eligible for inclusion.
This study followed Cochrane standards for extracting data and assessing data quality and used the PRISMA guideline for reporting. Risk of bias of individual studies was assessed using the second version of the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis was used to rate the certainty of evidence for meta-analytical results.
Eight psychotherapies were compared against one another and with 2 control conditions. Primary outcomes were severity of GAD symptoms and acceptability of the psychotherapies. Random-effects model pairwise and network meta-analyses were conducted. For effectiveness, standardized mean differences (SMDs) were pooled, and for acceptability, relative risks with 95% CIs were calculated.
Data from 65 RCTs were included. Effect size estimates on data from 5048 participants (mean [SD], 70.9% [11.9%] women; mean [SD] age, 42.2 [12.5] years) suggested that third-wave cognitive behavior therapies (CBTs) (SMD, -0.76 [95% CI, -1.15 to -0.36]; certainty, moderate), CBT (SMD, -0.74 [95% CI, -1.09 to -0.38]; certainty, moderate), and relaxation therapy (SMD, -0.59 [95% CI, -1.07 to -0.11]; certainty, low) were associated with reduced GAD symptoms vs treatment as usual. Relative risks for all-cause discontinuation (indication of acceptability) signaled no differences compared with treatment as usual for all psychotherapies (eg, relative risk, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.64-1.67] for CBT vs treatment as usual). When excluding studies at high risk of bias, relaxation therapy lost its superiority over treatment as usual (SMD, -0.47; 95% CI, -1.18 to 0.23). When considering anxiety severity at 3 to 12 months after completion of the intervention, only CBT remained significantly associated with greater effectiveness than treatment as usual (SMD, -0.60; 95% CI, -0.99 to -0.21).
Given the evidence in this systematic review and network meta-analysis for its associations with both acute and long-term effectiveness, CBT may represent the first-line therapy of GAD. Third-wave CBTs and relaxation therapy were associated with short-term effectiveness and may also be offered.
广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)是成年人中最常见的精神障碍之一。心理疗法是治疗 GAD 的最推荐治疗方法之一,但需要明确哪种方法应被视为一线治疗。
使用网络荟萃分析来检查不同心理疗法在成年人 GAD 中的短期和长期有效性和可接受性结果。
从数据库创建到 2023 年 1 月 1 日,检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO 和 Cochrane 对照试验登记处,以确定针对 GAD 成人的各种心理疗法的随机临床试验(RCT)。
符合纳入标准的 RCT 为比较任何类型的心理疗法与另一种心理疗法或与对照条件治疗原发性 GAD 成人(≥18 岁,男女)的研究。
本研究遵循 Cochrane 标准提取数据和评估数据质量,并使用 PRISMA 指南报告。使用 Cochrane 风险偏倚工具的第二版评估单个研究的风险偏倚,并使用网络荟萃分析置信度来评估荟萃分析结果的证据确定性。
将 8 种心理疗法相互比较,并与 2 种对照条件进行比较。主要结局是 GAD 症状的严重程度和心理疗法的可接受性。进行了随机效应模型成对和网络荟萃分析。对于有效性,汇总了标准化均数差值(SMD),对于可接受性,计算了相对风险及其 95%置信区间(CI)。
纳入了 65 项 RCT 的数据。来自 5048 名参与者(平均[标准差],70.9%[11.9%]女性;平均[标准差]年龄,42.2[12.5]岁)的数据的效应大小估计表明,第三波认知行为疗法(CBT)(SMD,-0.76[95%CI,-1.15 至-0.36];确定性,中度)、CBT(SMD,-0.74[95%CI,-1.09 至-0.38];确定性,中度)和放松疗法(SMD,-0.59[95%CI,-1.07 至-0.11];确定性,低)与降低 GAD 症状相关,与常规治疗相比。与常规治疗相比,所有心理疗法的全因停药(表示可接受性)的相对风险均无差异(例如,CBT 与常规治疗相比,相对风险为 1.04[95%CI,0.64-1.67])。当排除高风险偏倚的研究时,放松疗法失去了其优于常规治疗的优势(SMD,-0.47;95%CI,-1.18 至 0.23)。当考虑干预结束后 3 至 12 个月的焦虑严重程度时,只有 CBT 与常规治疗相比仍然与更高的疗效显著相关(SMD,-0.60;95%CI,-0.99 至-0.21)。
鉴于本系统评价和网络荟萃分析中的证据表明其与急性和长期疗效均相关,CBT 可能是 GAD 的一线治疗方法。第三波 CBT 和放松疗法与短期疗效相关,也可能被提供。