• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Verification of documentation plausibility in equine passports-drug documentation for geldings in comparison to self-reported veterinarian drug usage for equine castrations in Germany.验证马护照文件的合理性——去势公马药物使用文件与德国兽医报告的去势马药物使用的比较。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 18;18(10):e0292969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292969. eCollection 2023.
2
A comparative survey of veterinarians, equine owners, and equine keepers regarding the knowledge and implementation of legal requirements in Germany for the use and documentation of veterinary medicines in equines intended for slaughter.一份针对兽医、马术爱好者和马术饲养者的比较调查报告,内容涉及在德国,关于在用于屠宰的马属动物中使用和记录兽医药品的法律要求的知识和实施情况。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 6;18(4):e0283371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283371. eCollection 2023.
3
Survey of equine castration techniques, preferences and outcomes among Australian veterinarians.澳大利亚兽医对马去势技术、偏好及结果的调查。
Aust Vet J. 2018 Jan;96(1-2):39-45. doi: 10.1111/avj.12656. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
4
Overview of the Current Situation in a Sample of Headshakers and Owner Assessment of Effective Therapeutic Measures Used in Germany.摇头人群样本现状概述及德国有效治疗措施的主人评估。
J Equine Vet Sci. 2020 Dec;95:103270. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103270. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
5
Digitalisation in pre-purchase examination and prospects for an equine health database in Germany-Results of an online survey among equine veterinarians.数字化在马术前检查中的应用以及德国建立马健康数据库的前景——一项针对马兽医的在线调查结果。
Equine Vet J. 2024 Sep;56(5):1050-1058. doi: 10.1111/evj.14001. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
6
Owner reported clinical signs and -treatment decisions in equine pastern dermatitis.马跗关节皮炎的临床症状及治疗决策由主人汇报。
Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 2022 May;164(5):401-412. doi: 10.17236/sat00356.
7
Owner and Veterinarian Perceptions of Equine Euthanasia and Mortality Composting.马属动物安乐死和死亡堆肥的所有者和兽医认知。
J Equine Vet Sci. 2021 Apr;99:103402. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103402. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
8
The use of sedatives, analgesic and anaesthetic drugs in the horse: an electronic survey of members of the American Association of Equine Practitioners (AAEP).马镇静剂、镇痛药和麻醉剂的使用:美国兽医协会(AAEP)成员的电子调查。
Equine Vet J. 2010 Sep;42(6):487-93. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00104.x.
9
Complications associated with closed castration using the Henderson equine castration instrument in 300 standing equids.使用亨德森马去势器械对300匹站立的马进行闭合式去势相关的并发症
Vet Surg. 2019 Jan;48(1):21-28. doi: 10.1111/vsu.12960. Epub 2018 Oct 27.
10
The role of an equine nutritionist in equine health, performance and wellbeing: Ideas stemming from an equine science society symposium workshop.马营养学家在马的健康、表现和福利中的作用:源自马科学学会研讨会工作坊的想法。
J Equine Vet Sci. 2024 Apr;135:105047. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105047. Epub 2024 Mar 15.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparative survey of veterinarians, equine owners, and equine keepers regarding the knowledge and implementation of legal requirements in Germany for the use and documentation of veterinary medicines in equines intended for slaughter.一份针对兽医、马术爱好者和马术饲养者的比较调查报告,内容涉及在德国,关于在用于屠宰的马属动物中使用和记录兽医药品的法律要求的知识和实施情况。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 6;18(4):e0283371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283371. eCollection 2023.
2
Confusion over horse passports.
Vet Rec. 2013 Sep 21;173(11):258. doi: 10.1136/vr.f5671.
3
Monitoring of antibiotic consumption in livestock: a German feasibility study.家畜抗生素使用监测:德国可行性研究。
Prev Vet Med. 2012 Apr 1;104(1-2):34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.10.013. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
4
[Systematic drug documentation].
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2005 Jul;48(7):736-41. doi: 10.1007/s00103-005-1072-z.

验证马护照文件的合理性——去势公马药物使用文件与德国兽医报告的去势马药物使用的比较。

Verification of documentation plausibility in equine passports-drug documentation for geldings in comparison to self-reported veterinarian drug usage for equine castrations in Germany.

机构信息

Institute of Food Safety and Food Hygiene, Working Group Meat Hygiene, School of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Clinic for Horses, School of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Oct 18;18(10):e0292969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292969. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0292969
PMID:37851658
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10584153/
Abstract

The 'positive list for equines' (Regulation (EC) No 1950/2006) was implemented in the European Union in 2006. The drugs listed are approved for use in slaughter equines under certain conditions, although those drugs are not approved for use in livestock and are not listed in Table 1 of the annex to Regulation (EU) No 37/2010. The usage of such drugs has to be documented in the equine passport and a withdrawal period of six months must be adhered to before the equine can be slaughtered for human consumption. Since the withdrawal period is long, correct documentation is particularly important. This study compared the results of two sub-studies. In sub-study 1, 116 veterinarians and nine equine clinics in Germany were surveyed about the methods and drugs used for castration of equine stallions. In sub-study 2, the documentational findings of 195 equine passports, belonging to 194 horses and one donkey, were analyzed. Regarding sub-study 1, the most commonly used method for castration was reported as 'laid down'. Drug combinations entailing at least one drug from the 'positive list' were used by 86.7% (91/105) of veterinarians castrating horse stallions 'laid down' and by 64.3% (36/56) of veterinarians utilizing this method on donkey stallions. Regarding sub-study 2, drug documentation was verified in the passports of 4.6% (9/195) of all equines and in just 12.0% (3/25) of those belonging to slaughter equine geldings. Anesthetics from the 'positive list' were documented in 4.0% (1/25) of equine passports belonging to slaughter geldings. Because of the high discrepancy of the drug combinations used by veterinarians and the documentation actually found in equine passports, we conclude that drug administration is very seldom documented in equine passports in Germany. This could result in drug residues in equine meat and poses a potential risk for consumers.

摘要

《马属动物正面清单》(EC 法规 No 1950/2006)于 2006 年在欧盟实施。列入清单的药物经批准可在某些条件下用于屠宰马属动物,但这些药物未经批准用于牲畜,也未列入法规(EU)No 37/2010 的附件表 1 中。此类药物的使用必须在马属动物护照中记录,并在马属动物被屠宰供人类食用前遵守六个月的停药期。由于停药期较长,正确的记录尤为重要。本研究比较了两项子研究的结果。在子研究 1 中,对德国的 116 名兽医和 9 家马属动物诊所进行了调查,内容涉及阉割种马的方法和使用的药物。在子研究 2 中,分析了 195 本马属动物护照的记录,这些护照属于 194 匹马和 1 头驴。关于子研究 1,报告中最常用的阉割方法是“躺卧法”。86.7%(91/105)阉割种马“躺卧法”的兽医和 64.3%(36/56)阉割驴种马“躺卧法”的兽医使用了至少一种来自“正面清单”的药物组合。关于子研究 2,在所有马属动物护照的 4.6%(9/195)和属于屠宰用骟马的 12.0%(3/25)中,对药物记录进行了核实。在属于屠宰用骟马的 25 本马属动物护照中,有 4.0%(1/25)记录了麻醉剂来自“正面清单”。由于兽医使用的药物组合与马属动物护照中实际发现的药物组合之间存在很大差异,我们得出结论,德国马属动物护照中很少记录药物管理情况。这可能导致马肉中存在药物残留,对消费者构成潜在风险。