Suppr超能文献

世代交替对全口数字印模准确性的影响。

The effect of generation change on the accuracy of full arch digital impressions.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Szentkiralyi street 47, Budapest, 1088, Hungary.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2023 Oct 18;23(1):766. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03476-z.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study is aimed to evaluate the effect of generation change on accuracy of IOSs on full-arch scans and the inter-operator reliability.

METHODS

In this study, 6 different IOS were tested: 3Shape Trios 3 (20.1.2.), 3Shape Trios 4 (20.1.1.), Medit i500 (2.3.6.), Medit i700 (2.4.6.), Planmeca Emerald (6.0.1.) and Planmeca Emerald S (6.0.1.). Eighteen dental students, inexperienced in scanning, took part in this study as operators. Each operator made 10 digital impressions; altogether, 30 impressions were made by each scanner. The 30 STL files were imported to the Geomagic Control X program, where they were compared to a reference STL file; the surface point's deviation of the full arch and the distance between the second molars' distobuccal cusps were measured, the inter-operator reliability was also investigated.

RESULTS

A significant increase in accuracy was found between Trios 3 and 4 in the case of both parameters and between Medit i500 and i700 in the case of full arch. There was no significant difference between Planmeca generations. In case of the inter-operator reliability no significant difference was detected.

CONCLUSION

Within this current study's limitation, it can be concluded that surface digitalization's accuracy can be modified with generation changes and that digital technology is less technique sensitive than traditional impression taking.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估全口扫描中不同代次的口内扫描仪(IOS)对准确性的影响,以及操作者之间的可靠性。

方法

本研究共测试了 6 种不同的 IOS:3Shape Trios 3(20.1.2.)、3Shape Trios 4(20.1.1.)、Medit i500(2.3.6.)、Medit i700(2.4.6.)、Planmeca Emerald(6.0.1.)和 Planmeca Emerald S(6.0.1.)。18 名缺乏扫描经验的牙科学生作为操作者参与了本研究。每位操作者完成 10 次数字化印模,共由每个扫描仪完成 30 次印模。将 30 个 STL 文件导入 Geomagic Control X 程序,与参考 STL 文件进行比较;测量全口的表面点偏差和第二磨牙的远颊尖之间的距离,同时还研究了操作者之间的可靠性。

结果

在这两个参数方面,Trios 3 和 4 之间以及 Medit i500 和 i700 之间的准确性都有显著提高。在 Planmeca 两代之间没有发现显著差异。在操作者之间的可靠性方面没有发现显著差异。

结论

在本研究的局限性内,可以得出结论,表面数字化的准确性可以通过代次的改变来修改,并且数字技术比传统取模技术对技术的敏感性更低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb31/10585882/289f493c6488/12903_2023_3476_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验