• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

世代交替对全口数字印模准确性的影响。

The effect of generation change on the accuracy of full arch digital impressions.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Szentkiralyi street 47, Budapest, 1088, Hungary.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2023 Oct 18;23(1):766. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03476-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-023-03476-z
PMID:37853398
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10585882/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study is aimed to evaluate the effect of generation change on accuracy of IOSs on full-arch scans and the inter-operator reliability.

METHODS

In this study, 6 different IOS were tested: 3Shape Trios 3 (20.1.2.), 3Shape Trios 4 (20.1.1.), Medit i500 (2.3.6.), Medit i700 (2.4.6.), Planmeca Emerald (6.0.1.) and Planmeca Emerald S (6.0.1.). Eighteen dental students, inexperienced in scanning, took part in this study as operators. Each operator made 10 digital impressions; altogether, 30 impressions were made by each scanner. The 30 STL files were imported to the Geomagic Control X program, where they were compared to a reference STL file; the surface point's deviation of the full arch and the distance between the second molars' distobuccal cusps were measured, the inter-operator reliability was also investigated.

RESULTS

A significant increase in accuracy was found between Trios 3 and 4 in the case of both parameters and between Medit i500 and i700 in the case of full arch. There was no significant difference between Planmeca generations. In case of the inter-operator reliability no significant difference was detected.

CONCLUSION

Within this current study's limitation, it can be concluded that surface digitalization's accuracy can be modified with generation changes and that digital technology is less technique sensitive than traditional impression taking.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估全口扫描中不同代次的口内扫描仪(IOS)对准确性的影响,以及操作者之间的可靠性。

方法

本研究共测试了 6 种不同的 IOS:3Shape Trios 3(20.1.2.)、3Shape Trios 4(20.1.1.)、Medit i500(2.3.6.)、Medit i700(2.4.6.)、Planmeca Emerald(6.0.1.)和 Planmeca Emerald S(6.0.1.)。18 名缺乏扫描经验的牙科学生作为操作者参与了本研究。每位操作者完成 10 次数字化印模,共由每个扫描仪完成 30 次印模。将 30 个 STL 文件导入 Geomagic Control X 程序,与参考 STL 文件进行比较;测量全口的表面点偏差和第二磨牙的远颊尖之间的距离,同时还研究了操作者之间的可靠性。

结果

在这两个参数方面,Trios 3 和 4 之间以及 Medit i500 和 i700 之间的准确性都有显著提高。在 Planmeca 两代之间没有发现显著差异。在操作者之间的可靠性方面没有发现显著差异。

结论

在本研究的局限性内,可以得出结论,表面数字化的准确性可以通过代次的改变来修改,并且数字技术比传统取模技术对技术的敏感性更低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb31/10585882/2dd2cb557787/12903_2023_3476_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb31/10585882/289f493c6488/12903_2023_3476_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb31/10585882/2dd2cb557787/12903_2023_3476_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb31/10585882/289f493c6488/12903_2023_3476_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb31/10585882/2dd2cb557787/12903_2023_3476_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of generation change on the accuracy of full arch digital impressions.世代交替对全口数字印模准确性的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Oct 18;23(1):766. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03476-z.
2
A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study.三种口内扫描仪准确性的比较:一项单盲体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Nov;124(5):581-588. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.10.023. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
3
Trueness and precision of complete arch dentate digital models produced by intraoral and desktop scanners: An ex-vivo study.口内扫描仪和桌面扫描仪制作全牙弓数字化模型的准确性和精确性:一项离体研究。
J Dent. 2023 Dec;139:104764. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104764. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
4
Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study.六种口内扫描仪扫描全口义齿和 4 单位固定局部义齿的准确性:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Aug;128(2):187-194. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.007. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
5
Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans.环境光照条件对七种全口种植体扫描口内扫描仪准确性和扫描时间的影响。
J Dent. 2022 Jun;121:104138. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104138. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
6
Accuracy of conventional impressions and digital scans for implant-supported fixed prostheses in maxillary free-ended partial edentulism: An in vitro study.上颌游离端部分牙列缺失患者种植支持固定义齿传统印模与数字化扫描的准确性:一项体外研究
J Dent. 2024 Apr;143:104892. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104892. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
7
Effect of different impression coping and scan body designs on the accuracy of conventional versus digital implant impressions: An in vitro study.不同印模托盘和扫描体设计对传统与数字化种植体印模精度的影响:一项体外研究。
J Dent. 2024 Jul;146:105045. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105045. Epub 2024 May 5.
8
Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro.体外实际口腔内扫描系统全牙弓和部分牙弓印模的准确性。
Int J Comput Dent. 2019;22(1):11-19.
9
Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans.操作人员经验、扫描仪类型和扫描范围对 3D 扫描的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Feb;125(2):294-299. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.12.011. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
10
Digital intraoral scanner devices: a validation study based on common evaluation criteria.数字化口内扫描仪设备:基于通用评估标准的验证研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Apr 26;22(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02176-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of intraoral scans of the edentulous maxilla - an in vitro study.无牙上颌骨口内扫描的准确性——一项体外研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jun 17;29(7):342. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06419-w.
2
The influence of the superimposition procedure and type of intraoral impression on the superimposition accuracy of CBCT scans with dental impressions in implant planning: an in-vitro study.种植规划中,口内印模的叠加程序和类型对CBCT扫描与牙印模叠加精度的影响:一项体外研究。
Int J Implant Dent. 2025 Mar 28;11(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40729-025-00612-y.
3
Accuracy of digital jaw relation determination in different occlusal conditions - an in vitro study.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the learning curve of intraoral scanning with two different intraoral scanners based on scanning time.基于扫描时间的两种不同口内扫描仪的学习曲线比较。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 May 9;23(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02963-7.
2
The impact of software updates on accuracy of intraoral scanners.软件更新对口腔内扫描仪准确性的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Apr 15;23(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02926-y.
3
Intraoral Scans of Full Dental Arches: An In Vitro Measurement Study of the Accuracy of Different Intraoral Scanners.
不同咬合条件下数字化颌关系确定的准确性——一项体外研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Dec 14;29(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06101-7.
4
Comparison of trueness, time, and number of images among different denture digitization protocols.不同义齿数字化方案在准确性、时间和图像数量方面的比较。
J Prosthodont. 2025 Apr;34(4):388-394. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13967. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
5
Comparative Analysis of Four Different Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study.四种不同口腔内扫描仪的比较分析:一项体外研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jul 8;14(13):1453. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14131453.
全牙弓口内扫描:不同口内扫描仪准确性的体外测量研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 8;20(6):4776. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064776.
4
Occlusal caries detection on 3D models obtained with an intraoral scanner. A validation study.利用口内扫描仪获取的 3D 模型进行咬合面龋检测。一项验证研究。
J Dent. 2023 Apr;131:104457. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104457. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
5
Impact of scanning strategy on the accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans: a preliminary study on segmental scans and merge methods.扫描策略对全牙弓口内扫描准确性的影响:关于分段扫描及合并方法的初步研究
J Adv Prosthodont. 2022 Apr;14(2):88-95. doi: 10.4047/jap.2022.14.2.88. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
6
Digital intraoral scanner devices: a validation study based on common evaluation criteria.数字化口内扫描仪设备:基于通用评估标准的验证研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Apr 26;22(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02176-4.
7
Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans.环境光照条件对七种全口种植体扫描口内扫描仪准确性和扫描时间的影响。
J Dent. 2022 Jun;121:104138. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104138. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
8
New Caries Diagnostic Tools in Intraoral Scanners: A Comparative In Vitro Study to Established Methods in Permanent and Primary Teeth.口腔内扫描仪中新龋病诊断工具的研究:与恒牙和乳牙中已建立方法的比较性体外研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Mar 10;22(6):2156. doi: 10.3390/s22062156.
9
Digital impressions' accuracy through "cut-out-rescan" and "data exchange by over scanning" techniques in complete arches of two intraoral scanners and CAD/CAM software.两种口内扫描仪和 CAD/CAM 软件在全牙弓中通过“切出-重扫”和“过度扫描数据交换”技术的数字印模精度。
J Prosthodont Res. 2022 Jul 30;66(3):509-513. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00089. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
10
A Comparison of Full Arch Trueness and Precision of Nine Intra-Oral Digital Scanners and Four Lab Digital Scanners.九款口腔内数字扫描仪和四款实验室数字扫描仪的全牙弓准确性和精度比较
Dent J (Basel). 2021 Jun 23;9(7):75. doi: 10.3390/dj9070075.