• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情封锁是否会影响风险态度?——来自泰国农村的证据。

Does the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown affect risk attitudes?-Evidence from rural Thailand.

机构信息

Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Georg-August-University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Oct 19;18(10):e0292873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292873. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0292873
PMID:37856425
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10586670/
Abstract

Empirical research provides evidence on changes in individuals' risk attitudes after experiencing exogenous shocks. The global outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has had various adverse impacts on economies and households. This study utilizes the COVID-19 pandemic and the accompanying lockdown to explore its impact on risk attitudes in rural Thailand using a difference-in-difference (DiD) approach. Overall, we do not find evidence on considerable changes in the willingness to take risks of rural household members after experiencing a lockdown during the pandemic. However, a significant heterogenous effect is found between individuals working inside and outside the agricultural sector. Individuals working outside the agricultural sector have a statistically significant reduction in their willingness to take risks after experiencing a lockdown. Our study provides additional empirical evidence to understand the impact of shocks on rural households' risk attitudes. This sheds light on how policy designs can better help mitigate downward economic trends following exogenous shocks.

摘要

实证研究为个体经历外生冲击后风险态度变化提供了证据。COVID-19 大流行的爆发对经济和家庭造成了各种不利影响。本研究利用 COVID-19 大流行和随之而来的封锁,采用双重差分(DiD)方法探讨了其对泰国农村风险态度的影响。总体而言,我们没有发现农村家庭成员在大流行期间经历封锁后风险意愿发生重大变化的证据。然而,我们发现个体在农业部门内外工作之间存在显著的异质效应。在经历封锁后,从事农业部门以外工作的个体的风险意愿显著降低。本研究提供了额外的经验证据,以了解冲击对农村家庭风险态度的影响。这说明了政策设计如何更好地帮助减轻外生冲击后经济下行趋势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1362/10586670/4b38b2f2d341/pone.0292873.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1362/10586670/2f79e1f2a119/pone.0292873.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1362/10586670/4b38b2f2d341/pone.0292873.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1362/10586670/2f79e1f2a119/pone.0292873.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1362/10586670/4b38b2f2d341/pone.0292873.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Does the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown affect risk attitudes?-Evidence from rural Thailand.新冠疫情封锁是否会影响风险态度?——来自泰国农村的证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 19;18(10):e0292873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292873. eCollection 2023.
2
Pattern of OPD utilisation during the COVID-19 pandemic under the Universal Coverage Scheme in Thailand: what can 850 million records tell us?在泰国全民医疗保险计划下,COVID-19 大流行期间的门诊利用模式:8.5 亿条记录能告诉我们什么?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 3;23(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09121-3.
3
Estimating the potential overdiagnosis and overtreatment of acute appendicitis in Thailand using a secondary data analysis of service utilization before, during and after the COVID-19 lockdown policy.利用 COVID-19 封锁政策前后服务利用的二次数据分析泰国急性阑尾炎的潜在过度诊断和过度治疗。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 3;17(11):e0270241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270241. eCollection 2022.
4
Impacts of the Pandemic, Animal Source Food Retailers' and Consumers' Knowledge and Attitudes toward COVID-19, and Their Food Safety Practices in Chiang Mai, Thailand.泰国清迈大流行的影响、动物源食品零售商和消费者对 COVID-19 的认知、态度及其食品安全措施。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 17;19(16):10187. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610187.
5
The economic impacts of COVID-19 lockdown on low-income older people in Thailand.新冠肺炎疫情封锁对泰国低收入老年人的经济影响。
Australas J Ageing. 2023 Jun;42(2):334-343. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13163. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
6
Factors Affecting Breastfeeding Practices under Lockdown during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Thailand: A Cross-Sectional Survey.新冠肺炎疫情期间泰国封城下母乳喂养实践的影响因素:一项横断面调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 18;18(16):8729. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168729.
7
Maternal Mental Health under COVID-19 Pandemic in Thailand.泰国 COVID-19 大流行期间的孕产妇心理健康。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 29;19(1):347. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010347.
8
COVID-19 pandemic: A review of the global lockdown and its far-reaching effects.新冠疫情大流行:对全球封锁及其深远影响的综述。
Sci Prog. 2021 Apr-Jun;104(2):368504211019854. doi: 10.1177/00368504211019854.
9
Revisiting the levels of Aerosol Optical Depth in south-southeast Asia, Europe and USA amid the COVID-19 pandemic using satellite observations.利用卫星观测,重新审视 COVID-19 大流行期间东南亚、欧洲和美国的气溶胶光学深度水平。
Environ Res. 2021 Feb;193:110514. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110514. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
10
Changes in agricultural context and mental health of farmers in different regions of Thailand during the fifth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 疫情第五波期间,泰国不同地区农业环境变化对农民心理健康的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 9;22(1):2050. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14464-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Decoding depression by exploring the exposome-genome edge amidst COVID-19 lockdown.解析大疫情时代的“暴露组-基因组边缘”以探索抑郁症的奥秘
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 12;14(1):13562. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64200-7.

本文引用的文献

1
On the stability of risk preferences: Measurement matters.论风险偏好的稳定性:测量至关重要。
Econ Lett. 2022 Jan;210:110172. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2021.110172. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
2
Anti-social behaviour and economic decision-making: Panel experimental evidence in the wake of COVID-19.反社会行为与经济决策:新冠疫情后的面板实验证据
J Econ Behav Organ. 2023 Feb;206:136-171. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2022.12.007. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
3
Economic preferences and compliance in the social stress test of the COVID-19 crisis.新冠疫情危机社会压力测试中的经济偏好与依从性
J Public Econ. 2021 Feb;194:104322. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104322. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
4
Editorial: Gender Differentials in Times of COVID-19.社论:新冠疫情时期的性别差异
Front Psychol. 2022 May 23;13:901087. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901087. eCollection 2022.
5
Associations of lockdown stringency and duration with Google searches for mental health terms during the COVID-19 pandemic: A nine-country study.新冠疫情期间封锁措施的严格程度和持续时间与谷歌心理健康搜索词条之间的关联:九国研究。
J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Jun;150:237-245. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.03.026. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
6
How does risk preference change under the stress of COVID-19? Evidence from Japan.在新冠疫情的压力下,风险偏好是如何变化的?来自日本的证据。
J Risk Uncertain. 2022;64(2):191-212. doi: 10.1007/s11166-022-09374-z. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
7
Stability of Risk Preferences During COVID-19: Evidence From Four Measurements.新冠疫情期间风险偏好的稳定性:来自四项测量的证据
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 10;12:702028. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.702028. eCollection 2021.
8
Risky but alluring: Severe COVID-19 pandemic influence increases risk taking.危险但诱人:严重的 COVID-19 大流行影响增加了冒险行为。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2021 Dec;27(4):679-694. doi: 10.1037/xap0000380.
9
How the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic impacted pro-social behaviour and individual preferences: Experimental evidence from China.新冠疫情的爆发如何影响亲社会行为和个人偏好:来自中国的实验证据。
J Econ Behav Organ. 2021 Oct;190:480-494. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
10
Pre-existing health conditions and severe COVID-19 outcomes: an umbrella review approach and meta-analysis of global evidence.既往健康状况与严重 COVID-19 结局:全球证据的伞式评价方法和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2021 Aug 27;19(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02058-6.