• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经历生殖胁迫的风险因素和健康后果:范围综述方案。

Risk factors and health consequences of experiencing reproductive coercion: a scoping review protocol.

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Monash University School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Judith Lumley Centre, NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Sexual and Reproductive Health for Women in Primary Care (SPHERE), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 19;13(10):e073326. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073326.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073326
PMID:37857548
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10603526/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Reproductive coercion (RC) describes behaviours that interfere with an individual's reproductive autonomy and decision-making. RC can be a form of intimate partner violence and overlaps with other forms of gender-based violence, such as sexual violence. Health settings are well placed to identify and intervene to support patients experiencing RC, however, the lack of conceptual clarity on RC means that health providers are not easily able to identify those at risk of experiencing RC. To facilitate appropriate identification and development of interventions, there is a need to understand the risk factors related to experiencing RC and associated health consequences.

AIM

To assess the current scope of evidence in relation to risk factors and health consequences of experiencing RC.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Eligible articles for inclusion in the scoping review will be original peer-reviewed literature that describe risk factors and health consequences of any type of RC. Studies on humans published in English since 2010 will be included. The proposed scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI Methodology. This protocol is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. Five electronic databases, OVID Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, PsychINFO and Embase, will be searched for relevant literature from 1 January 2010 to 23 January 2023. Two reviewers will individually screen and review articles for eligibility, and conflicts will be resolved by a third reviewer. Data will be charted and reported using a tool developed for the purpose of this review.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Findings will be disseminated in publications and presentations to relevant stakeholders. Ethical approval is not required as data from publicly available literature sources will be used. Available evidence will be mapped across the breadth of eligible studies to identify associated risk factors and health consequences of RC.

摘要

简介

生殖胁迫(RC)描述了干扰个人生殖自主权和决策的行为。RC 可能是亲密伴侣暴力的一种形式,与其他形式的性别暴力(如性暴力)重叠。卫生机构非常适合识别和干预那些经历 RC 的患者,然而,由于 RC 概念上不够清晰,卫生服务提供者难以识别那些有经历 RC 风险的人。为了促进适当的识别和干预措施的制定,有必要了解与经历 RC 相关的风险因素以及相关的健康后果。

目的

评估与经历 RC 相关的风险因素和健康后果的现有证据范围。

方法和分析

将纳入范围综述的合格文章将是描述任何类型 RC 的风险因素和健康后果的原始同行评审文献。纳入 2010 年以来以英文发表的人类研究。该拟议的范围综述将按照 JBI 方法进行。本方案按照系统评价和荟萃分析方案的首选报告项目进行报告。将从 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 1 月 23 日,在五个电子数据库(OVID Medline、CINAHL、Scopus、PsychINFO 和 Embase)中搜索相关文献。两名评审员将分别对文章进行筛选和评估,如有冲突将由第三名评审员解决。将使用为此审查目的开发的工具对数据进行图表化和报告。

伦理和传播

研究结果将以出版物和报告的形式传播给相关利益攸关方。由于将使用来自公开文献来源的数据,因此不需要伦理批准。将对符合条件的研究的广泛范围内的现有证据进行映射,以确定 RC 的相关风险因素和健康后果。

相似文献

1
Risk factors and health consequences of experiencing reproductive coercion: a scoping review protocol.经历生殖胁迫的风险因素和健康后果:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 19;13(10):e073326. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073326.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Multifaceted pharmacist-led interventions in secondary care settings between countries of various income levels: a scoping review protocol.多方面的药师主导干预措施在不同收入水平国家的二级保健环境中:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 9;14(4):e083726. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083726.
6
Scoping review of pharmacy-based initiatives for preventing unintended pregnancy: protocol.基于药学的预防意外怀孕干预措施的范围综述:方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 2;10(1):e033002. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033002.
7
Athletes' access to, attitudes towards and experiences of help-seeking for mental health: a scoping review protocol.运动员获取心理健康帮助的途径、态度和体验:系统综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 6;13(4):e062279. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062279.
8
Interventions for intimate partner violence during the perinatal period: a scoping review protocol.围产期亲密伴侣暴力干预措施:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 14;13(7):e065560. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065560.
9
Uterine fibroids and Black people of African descent globally: a scoping review protocol.全球范围内的子宫肌瘤和非裔非洲人:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 25;14(8):e085622. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085622.
10
Gender-sensitive and intersectionality-informed health indicators for health reporting: a scoping review protocol.用于健康报告的对性别问题有敏感认识和考虑到交叉问题的健康指标:范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 9;14(11):e091549. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091549.

引用本文的文献

1
Women's reproductive mental health: currently available evidence and future directions for research, clinical practice and health policy.女性生殖心理健康:当前可得证据以及研究、临床实践和卫生政策的未来方向
World Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;24(2):196-215. doi: 10.1002/wps.21305.
2
Experience of Contraceptive Denial, Perceived Ease of Future Access to Contraception, and Adverse Mental Health Outcomes in Polish Women.波兰女性的避孕拒绝经历、对未来获得避孕措施的感知难易程度及不良心理健康后果
Int J Womens Health. 2025 Jan 6;17:9-19. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S478652. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Women's perceptions and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse: a qualitative evidence synthesis.女性对生殖强迫和虐待的认知和体验:定性证据综合分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 21;16(12):e0261551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261551. eCollection 2021.
2
Reproductive coercion and abuse in Australia: what do we need to know?澳大利亚的生殖胁迫和虐待:我们需要了解什么?
Sex Health. 2021 Nov;18(5):436-440. doi: 10.1071/SH21116.
3
Barriers to responding to reproductive coercion and abuse among women presenting to Australian primary care.澳大利亚初级医疗保健机构中,女性应对生殖胁迫和虐待行为时面临的障碍。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 4;21(1):424. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06420-5.
4
A conceptual re-evaluation of reproductive coercion: centring intent, fear and control.对生殖强制的概念性再评估:以意图、恐惧和控制为中心。
Reprod Health. 2021 Apr 27;18(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01143-6.
5
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.范围综述实施的更新方法学指南。
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2119-2126. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167.
6
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
7
Training reproductive health providers to talk about intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion: an exploratory study.培训生殖健康服务提供者谈论亲密伴侣暴力和生殖胁迫:一项探索性研究。
Health Educ Res. 2018 Apr 1;33(2):175-185. doi: 10.1093/her/cyy007.
8
A Systematic Review of Reproductive Coercion in International Settings.国际环境下生殖胁迫的系统评价
World Med Health Policy. 2016 Dec;8(4):382-408. doi: 10.1002/wmh3.209. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
9
Reproductive Coercion: A Systematic Review.生殖胁迫:系统评价。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2018 Oct;19(4):371-390. doi: 10.1177/1524838016663935. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
10
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.