Jeong Eugene, Malin Bradley, Nelson Scott D, Su Yu, Li Lang, Chen You
Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Oct 3;14:1211491. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1211491. eCollection 2023.
The landscape of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) has evolved significantly over the past 60 years, necessitating a retrospective analysis to identify research trends and under-explored areas. While methodologies like bibliometric analysis provide valuable quantitative perspectives on DDI research, they have not successfully delineated the complex interrelations between drugs. Understanding these intricate relationships is essential for deciphering the evolving architecture and progressive transformation of DDI research structures over time. We utilize network analysis to unearth the multifaceted relationships between drugs, offering a richer, more nuanced comprehension of shifts in research focus within the DDI landscape. This groundbreaking investigation employs natural language processing, techniques, specifically Named Entity Recognition (NER) via ScispaCy, and the information extraction model, SciFive, to extract pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) DDI evidence from PubMed articles spanning January 1962 to July 2023. It reveals key trends and patterns through an innovative network analysis approach. Static network analysis is deployed to discern structural patterns in DDI research, while evolving network analysis is employed to monitor changes in the DDI research trend structures over time. Our compelling results shed light on the scale-free characteristics of pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and their combined networks, exhibiting power law exponent values of 2.5, 2.82, and 2.46, respectively. In these networks, a select few drugs serve as central hubs, engaging in extensive interactions with a multitude of other drugs. Interestingly, the networks conform to a densification power law, illustrating that the number of DDIs grows exponentially as new drugs are added to the DDI network. Notably, we discovered that drugs connected in PK and PD networks predominantly belong to the same categories defined by the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system, with fewer interactions observed between drugs from different categories. The finding suggests that PK and PD DDIs between drugs from different ATC categories have not been studied as extensively as those between drugs within the same categories. By unearthing these hidden patterns, our study paves the way for a deeper understanding of the DDI landscape, providing valuable information for future DDI research, clinical practice, and drug development focus areas.
在过去60年里,药物相互作用(DDI)的情况发生了显著变化,因此有必要进行回顾性分析,以确定研究趋势和未充分探索的领域。虽然文献计量分析等方法为DDI研究提供了有价值的定量视角,但它们尚未成功描绘出药物之间复杂的相互关系。理解这些错综复杂的关系对于解读DDI研究结构随时间的演变架构和渐进转变至关重要。我们利用网络分析来揭示药物之间的多方面关系,从而更丰富、更细致入微地理解DDI领域内研究重点的变化。这项开创性的研究采用自然语言处理技术,特别是通过ScispaCy进行命名实体识别(NER),以及信息提取模型SciFive,从1962年1月至2023年7月的PubMed文章中提取药代动力学(PK)和药效动力学(PD)DDI证据。它通过创新的网络分析方法揭示关键趋势和模式。静态网络分析用于识别DDI研究中的结构模式,而演化网络分析则用于监测DDI研究趋势结构随时间的变化。我们引人注目的结果揭示了药代动力学、药效动力学及其组合网络的无标度特征,其幂律指数值分别为2.5、2.82和2.46。在这些网络中,少数几种药物充当中心枢纽,与众多其他药物进行广泛的相互作用。有趣的是,这些网络符合致密化幂律,表明随着新药加入DDI网络,DDI的数量呈指数增长。值得注意的是,我们发现PK和PD网络中相互连接的药物主要属于解剖治疗化学(ATC)分类系统定义的同一类别,不同类别药物之间的相互作用较少。这一发现表明,来自不同ATC类别的药物之间的PK和PD DDI尚未像同一类别药物之间的DDI那样得到广泛研究。通过挖掘这些隐藏模式,我们的研究为更深入理解DDI领域铺平了道路,为未来的DDI研究、临床实践和药物开发重点领域提供了有价值的信息。