Rachelefsky G S, Wo J, Adelson J, Mickey M R, Spector S L, Katz R M, Siegel S C, Rohr A S
Pediatrics. 1986 Dec;78(6):1133-8.
Studies evaluating adverse effects of oral theophylline on learning and behavior have been performed on children with asthma receiving long-term theophylline therapy. To further differentiate the effects of asthma itself from the drugs used, we evaluated 20 asthmatic children (6 to 12 years of age) who had not received oral bronchodilators for at least 6 months. A double blind, placebo-controlled, parallel format was used with a 4-week theophylline or placebo period preceded by a 2-week baseline. Theophylline serum levels were maintained between 10 to 20 micrograms/mL. During baseline and treatment periods, the child's home and school behavior/performance were monitored independently by their parents and teachers using standardized report forms. A battery of psychologic tests was administered at the end of baseline and treatment periods. Seven children receiving theophylline were noted to have a change in school behavior and/or performance during their 4 weeks on drug compared to baseline, whereas none of the children receiving placebo were noted to be different (P = .004). Thus, the short-term administration of theophylline to asymptomatic asthmatic children not receiving oral bronchodilators can adversely affect school performance and behavior. Because this population represents the majority of asthmatic children, one needs to use theophylline cautiously in this age group, monitor school performance closely, or seek other treatment modalities.
针对接受长期茶碱治疗的哮喘儿童,已开展了评估口服茶碱对学习和行为不良影响的研究。为了进一步区分哮喘本身的影响与所用药物的影响,我们评估了20名(6至12岁)至少6个月未接受口服支气管扩张剂治疗的哮喘儿童。采用双盲、安慰剂对照、平行设计,在为期4周的茶碱或安慰剂治疗期之前有一个为期2周的基线期。茶碱血清水平维持在10至20微克/毫升之间。在基线期和治疗期,由孩子的父母和老师使用标准化报告表独立监测孩子在家和学校的行为/表现。在基线期和治疗期结束时进行一系列心理测试。与基线期相比,7名接受茶碱治疗的儿童在用药4周期间被发现学校行为和/或表现有变化,而接受安慰剂治疗的儿童均未发现有差异(P = 0.004)。因此,对未接受口服支气管扩张剂治疗的无症状哮喘儿童短期给予茶碱可能会对学校表现和行为产生不利影响。由于这一群体代表了大多数哮喘儿童,在这个年龄组使用茶碱时需要谨慎,密切监测学校表现,或寻求其他治疗方式。