Tinkelman D G, Miller E, Janky D G, Decouto J, Edelman L
Ann Allergy. 1985 Oct;55(4):571-6.
A double-blind crossover comparison of a 12-hour theophylline preparation (Theo-Dur) and a 24-hour theophylline preparation (Theo-24) was conducted with 20 young adult chronic asthmatic patients requiring daily bronchodilator therapy. The study group included 11 males and nine females ranging in age from 12 to 28 years. Clinical status and serum theophylline levels were monitored during the 4-week dosing interval on each medication. On the last day of each test period subjects were monitored closely throughout a 24-hour period. The results indicated little clinical difference between the two medications although there were statistically significant differences in the pharmacokinetic behavior between the two theophylline preparations.
对20名需要每日进行支气管扩张剂治疗的年轻成年慢性哮喘患者进行了一项双盲交叉比较,比较一种12小时茶碱制剂(茶喘平)和一种24小时茶碱制剂(葆乐辉)。研究组包括11名男性和9名女性,年龄在12至28岁之间。在每种药物为期4周的给药间隔期间监测临床状况和血清茶碱水平。在每个测试期的最后一天,对受试者进行24小时密切监测。结果表明,两种药物在临床上差异不大,尽管两种茶碱制剂在药代动力学行为上存在统计学上的显著差异。