取消医疗补助事先授权要求和丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物使用障碍。
Removal of Medicaid Prior Authorization Requirements and Buprenorphine Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder.
机构信息
Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
出版信息
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Oct 6;4(10):e233549. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3549.
IMPORTANCE
Buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) is associated with decreased morbidity and mortality. Despite its effectiveness, buprenorphine uptake has been limited relative to the burden of OUD. Prior authorization (PA) policies may present a barrier to treatment, though research is limited, particularly in Medicaid populations.
OBJECTIVE
To assess whether removal of Medicaid PAs for buprenorphine to treat OUD is associated with changes in buprenorphine prescriptions for Medicaid enrollees.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This state-level, serial cross-sectional study used quarterly data from 2015 through the first quarter (January-March) of 2019 to compare buprenorphine prescriptions in states that did and did not remove Medicaid PAs. Analyses were conducted between June 10, 2021, and August 15, 2023. The study included 23 states with active Medicaid PAs for buprenorphine in 2015 that required similar PA policies in fee-for-service and managed care plans and had at least 2 quarters of pre- and postperiod buprenorphine prescribing data.
EXPOSURES
Removal of Medicaid PA for at least 1 formulation of buprenorphine for OUD.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The main outcome was number of quarterly buprenorphine prescriptions per 1000 Medicaid enrollees.
RESULTS
Between 2015 and the first quarter of 2019, 6 states in the sample removed Medicaid PAs for at least 1 formulation of buprenorphine and had at least 2 quarters of pre- and postpolicy change data. Seventeen states maintained buprenorphine PAs throughout the study period. At baseline, relative to states that repealed PAs, states that maintained PAs had lower buprenorphine prescribing per 1000 Medicaid enrollees (median, 6.6 [IQR, 2.6-13.9] vs 24.1 [IQR, 8.7-27.5] prescriptions) and lower Medicaid managed care penetration (median, 38.5% [IQR, 0.0%-74.1%] vs 79.5% [IQR, 78.1%-83.5%] of enrollees) but similar opioid overdose rates and X-waivered buprenorphine clinicians per 100 000 population. In fully adjusted difference-in-differences models, removal of Medicaid PAs for buprenorphine was not associated with buprenorphine prescribing (1.4% decrease; 95% CI, -31.2% to 41.4%). For states with below-median baseline buprenorphine prescribing, PA removal was associated with increased buprenorphine prescriptions per 1000 Medicaid enrollees (40.1%; 95% CI, 0.6% to 95.1%), while states with above-median prescribing showed no change (-20.7%; 95% CI, -41.0% to 6.6%).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this serial cross-sectional study of Medicaid PA policies for buprenorphine for OUD, removal of PAs was not associated with overall changes in buprenorphine prescribing among Medicaid enrollees. Given the ongoing burden of opioid overdoses, continued multipronged efforts are needed to remove barriers to buprenorphine care and increase availability of this lifesaving treatment.
重要性:丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)与降低发病率和死亡率有关。尽管其有效,但相对于 OUD 的负担,丁丙诺啡的使用受到限制。尽管之前有授权(PA)政策可能是治疗的障碍,但研究有限,特别是在医疗补助人群中。
目的:评估是否取消医疗补助对丁丙诺啡治疗 OUD 的 PA 是否与医疗补助受助人丁丙诺啡处方的变化有关。
设计、设置和参与者:本州级、连续的横断面研究使用了 2015 年至 2019 年第一季度(1 月至 3 月)的季度数据,比较了在 2015 年有丁丙诺啡 PA 且在费比服务和管理式医疗计划中需要类似 PA 政策的州和没有丁丙诺啡 PA 的州的丁丙诺啡处方。分析于 2021 年 6 月 10 日至 2023 年 8 月 15 日进行。该研究包括 23 个州,在 2015 年有丁丙诺啡的医疗补助 PA,需要类似的 PA 政策,并且有至少 2 个季度的丁丙诺啡处方数据。
暴露:取消至少 1 种丁丙诺啡治疗 OUD 的医疗补助 PA。
主要结果和措施:主要结果是每 1000 名医疗补助受助人中每季度丁丙诺啡处方的数量。
结果:在 2015 年至 2019 年第一季度期间,样本中的 6 个州取消了至少 1 种丁丙诺啡的医疗补助 PA,并有至少 2 个季度的政策变化前后数据。17 个州在整个研究期间都维持丁丙诺啡 PA。在基线时,与取消 PA 的州相比,维持 PA 的州每 1000 名医疗补助受助人的丁丙诺啡处方量较低(中位数,6.6 [IQR,2.6-13.9] vs 24.1 [IQR,8.7-27.5]处方),医疗补助管理式医疗渗透率较低(中位数,38.5% [IQR,0.0%-74.1%] vs 79.5% [IQR,78.1%-83.5%]的受助人),但类似的阿片类药物过量率和 X 豁免的丁丙诺啡临床医生每 10 万人。在完全调整的差异差异模型中,取消丁丙诺啡的医疗补助 PA 与丁丙诺啡处方无关(减少 1.4%;95%CI,-31.2%至 41.4%)。对于基线丁丙诺啡处方量低于中位数的州,PA 取消与每 1000 名医疗补助受助人的丁丙诺啡处方量增加有关(40.1%;95%CI,0.6%至 95.1%),而处方量高于中位数的州则没有变化(-20.7%;95%CI,-41.0%至 6.6%)。
结论和相关性:在这项关于丁丙诺啡治疗 OUD 的医疗补助 PA 政策的连续横断面研究中,取消 PA 与医疗补助受助人丁丙诺啡处方量的总体变化无关。考虑到阿片类药物过量的持续负担,需要继续采取多方面的努力,以消除丁丙诺啡护理的障碍,并增加这种救生治疗的可及性。