Departamento de Ciencia Animal, Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón, Zaragoza 50059, Spain; Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza 50013, Spain.
Departamento de Mejora Genética Animal, Centro Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-CSIC), Madrid 28040, Spain.
J Dairy Sci. 2024 Apr;107(4):2156-2174. doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-23722. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
This study provides an understanding of dairy farmers' willingness to include heat tolerance in breeding goals and the modulating effect of sociopsychological factors and farm profile. A survey instrument including a choice experiment was designed to specifically address the trade-off between heat tolerance and milk production level. A total of 122 farmers across cattle, goat, and sheep farms were surveyed face-to-face. The results of the experiment show that most farmers perceive that heat stress and climate change are increasingly important problems, and that farming communities should invest more in generating knowledge and resources on mitigation strategies. However, we found limited initial support for selection for heat tolerance. This attitude changed when farmers were presented with objective information on the benefits and limitations of the different breeding choices, after which most farmers supported selection for heat tolerance, but only if doing so would compromise milk production gains to a small extent. Our results show that farmers' selection choices are driven by the interactions between heat stress risk perception, attitudes toward breeding tools, social trust, the species reared, and farm production level. In general, farmers willing to support selection of heat-tolerant animals are those with positive attitudes toward genetic values and genomic information and a strong perception of climate change and heat stress impacts on farms. On the contrary, negative support for selection for heat tolerance is found among farmers with high milk production levels; high trust in farming magazines, livestock farmers' associations, and veterinarians; and low trust in environmental and animalist groups.
本研究旨在了解奶农对将耐热性纳入选育目标的意愿,以及社会心理因素和农场特征的调节作用。设计了一个包含选择实验的调查工具,以专门解决耐热性与产奶量水平之间的权衡问题。对来自奶牛、山羊和绵羊养殖场的 122 名农民进行了面对面调查。实验结果表明,大多数农民认为热应激和气候变化是日益重要的问题,养殖社区应该投入更多资源来生成关于缓解策略的知识。然而,我们发现最初对选择耐热性的支持有限。当向农民提供有关不同选育选择的收益和限制的客观信息后,这种态度发生了变化,之后大多数农民支持选择耐热性,但前提是这样做不会对产奶量的增加造成很小的影响。我们的研究结果表明,农民的选择取决于热应激风险感知、对选育工具的态度、社会信任、养殖物种和农场生产水平之间的相互作用。总的来说,愿意支持选育耐热动物的农民是那些对遗传值和基因组信息持积极态度、对气候变化和热应激对农场的影响有强烈感知的农民。相反,那些产奶量水平较高、对养殖杂志、畜牧业协会和兽医高度信任、对环保和动物主义组织信任度较低的农民,则对选择耐热性持否定态度。