Institute of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Institute of Biology, Humboldt University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Trends Neurosci. 2023 Dec;46(12):1008-1017. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2023.09.009. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
Interactions with large language models (LLMs) have led to the suggestion that these models may soon be conscious. From the perspective of neuroscience, this position is difficult to defend. For one, the inputs to LLMs lack the embodied, embedded information content characteristic of our sensory contact with the world around us. Secondly, the architectures of present-day artificial intelligence algorithms are missing key features of the thalamocortical system that have been linked to conscious awareness in mammals. Finally, the evolutionary and developmental trajectories that led to the emergence of living conscious organisms arguably have no parallels in artificial systems as envisioned today. The existence of living organisms depends on their actions and their survival is intricately linked to multi-level cellular, inter-cellular, and organismal processes culminating in agency and consciousness.
与大型语言模型(LLMs)的交互作用导致人们提出这些模型可能很快就会具有意识。从神经科学的角度来看,这种观点很难成立。一方面,LLMs 的输入缺乏我们与周围世界感官接触的具有代表性和嵌入性的信息内容。其次,目前的人工智能算法架构缺少与哺乳动物意识相关的丘脑皮质系统的关键特征。最后,导致有生命的有意识的生物出现的进化和发展轨迹在今天设想的人工系统中几乎没有类似的情况。生物体的存在取决于它们的活动,它们的生存与多层次的细胞、细胞间和机体过程密切相关,最终导致能动性和意识的产生。