• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别原型阻碍旁观者对女性性骚扰的干预。

Gender Prototypes Hinder Bystander Intervention in Women's Sexual Harassment.

作者信息

Schachtman Rebecca, Gallegos Jonathan, Kaiser Cheryl R

机构信息

University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2025 Jun;51(6):1007-1029. doi: 10.1177/01461672231203290. Epub 2023 Oct 21.

DOI:10.1177/01461672231203290
PMID:37864478
Abstract

Bystander intervention is a powerful response to sexual harassment that reduces victims' burden to respond. However, gender prototypes depicting sexual harassment victims as prototypical women (i.e., stereotypically feminine) may hinder intervention when harassment targets women who deviate from this prototype. Across four preregistered experiments ( = 1,270 Americans), we test whether bystanders intervene less readily in nonprototypical (vs. prototypical) women's sexual harassment. Participants observed a man manager ask a series of increasingly sexually harassing job interview questions toward either a gender prototypical or nonprototypical woman by traits (Studies 1-3) or gender identity (Study 4). Participants were instructed to intervene to stop the interview if/when they judged the questions as inappropriate. A meta-analysis revealed participants had a greater threshold for intervention when harassment targeted a nonprototypical (vs. prototypical) woman-a small but meaningful effect. Efforts to foster bystander intervention in sexual harassment would benefit by recognizing this neglect of nonprototypical women.

摘要

旁观者干预是应对性骚扰的有力措施,可减轻受害者的回应负担。然而,将性骚扰受害者描绘成典型女性(即具有刻板女性特质)的性别原型,可能会在骚扰目标是偏离此原型的女性时阻碍干预行为。在四项预先注册的实验中(N = 1270名美国人),我们测试了旁观者对非典型(相对于典型)女性遭受性骚扰的干预是否不那么积极。参与者观察一名男性经理向一名在特质上(研究1 - 3)或性别认同上(研究4)符合或不符合性别原型的女性提出一系列越来越具性骚扰性质的求职面试问题。参与者被指示,如果他们判断这些问题不合适,要进行干预以停止面试。一项荟萃分析显示,当骚扰目标是不符合原型的女性时,参与者进行干预的阈值更高——这是一个虽小但有意义的影响。认识到对非典型女性的这种忽视,将有助于促进旁观者对性骚扰进行干预。

相似文献

1
Gender Prototypes Hinder Bystander Intervention in Women's Sexual Harassment.性别原型阻碍旁观者对女性性骚扰的干预。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2025 Jun;51(6):1007-1029. doi: 10.1177/01461672231203290. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
2
Bystanders' thresholds for intervention in Black vs. White women's sexual harassment.旁观者对黑人女性与白人女性遭受性骚扰时进行干预的门槛。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 23;19(2):e0296755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296755. eCollection 2024.
3
Narrow prototypes and neglected victims: Understanding perceptions of sexual harassment.狭窄的原型和被忽视的受害者:理解性骚扰的认知。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 May;122(5):873-893. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000260. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
4
Effects of Humor and Bystander Gender on Responses to Antigay Harassment.幽默与旁观者性别对反同性恋骚扰反应的影响
J Homosex. 2022 May 12;69(6):947-966. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2021.1898804. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
5
Are They Really Helping Them to "Get Over It"? Bystander Behavior After Sexual Harassment Incidents in the Fashion Industry.他们真的在帮助她们“克服它”吗?时尚界性骚扰事件后的旁观者行为。
J Interpers Violence. 2024 Apr;39(7-8):1704-1730. doi: 10.1177/08862605231209995. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
6
Sex-based harassment in employment: new insights into gender and context.就业中的性别骚扰:关于性别与环境的新见解。
Law Hum Behav. 2014 Feb;38(1):58-72. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000045. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
7
Gender disparity and sexual harassment in vascular surgery practices.血管外科学实践中的性别差异和性骚扰。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Aug;72(2):692-699. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.071. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
8
What Does it Mean to be a Woman? How the Content of Gender Identity May Facilitate Women's Coping with Sexual Harassment.女性意味着什么?性别认同的内容如何促进女性应对性骚扰。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Dec;37(23-24):NP22921-NP22943. doi: 10.1177/08862605211073095. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
9
Gender differences in evaluating social-sexual conduct in the workplace.职场中对社交性行为评估的性别差异。
Behav Sci Law. 1999;17(4):413-33. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0798(199910/12)17:4<413::aid-bsl364>3.0.co;2-b.
10
Sexual harassment: the "reasonable person" vs "reasonable woman" standards have not been resolved.性骚扰:“理性人”标准与“理性女性”标准的问题尚未得到解决。
Psychol Rep. 1996 Feb;78(1):329-30. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1996.78.1.329.

引用本文的文献

1
Do People Judge Sexual Harassment Differently Based on the Type of Job a Victim Has?人们会根据受害者的工作类型对性骚扰做出不同的评判吗?
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 1;15(6):757. doi: 10.3390/bs15060757.
2
Bystanders' thresholds for intervention in Black vs. White women's sexual harassment.旁观者对黑人女性与白人女性遭受性骚扰时进行干预的门槛。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 23;19(2):e0296755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296755. eCollection 2024.