• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人们会根据受害者的工作类型对性骚扰做出不同的评判吗?

Do People Judge Sexual Harassment Differently Based on the Type of Job a Victim Has?

作者信息

Halfon Carolyne Georgiana, McCray Destiny, Kulibert Danica

机构信息

Department of Psychological Science, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USA.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 1;15(6):757. doi: 10.3390/bs15060757.

DOI:10.3390/bs15060757
PMID:40564539
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12190054/
Abstract

Victims of sexual harassment report facing barriers and retaliation for reporting their sexual harassment. The current study assessed one potential reason for these issues: perceptions of sexual harassment events. Participants (N = 427) read about different sexual harassment events and were told that the woman in the event worked with a masculine (e.g., EMT, school police officer, plumber) or feminine job (e.g., nurse, teacher, cleaning staff). Across three different sexual harassment claims (e.g., unwanted romantic attention, physical groping, being shown sexually explicit images), participants reported that women in masculine jobs were less prototypical women than women in feminine jobs. Furthermore, these perceptions of prototypicality impacted how participants viewed the victim's sexual harassment event. The less a person views a victim as a typical woman, the less likely they are to label the victim's experience as sexual harassment. The results suggest that perceptions of sexual harassment are directly impacted by how people view a victim. Implications around prototypes of women and sexual harassment claims are discussed.

摘要

性骚扰受害者报告称,他们在举报性骚扰行为时面临诸多障碍并遭到报复。当前的研究评估了导致这些问题的一个潜在原因:对性骚扰事件的认知。参与者(N = 427)阅读了不同的性骚扰事件,并被告知事件中的女性从事男性化工作(如急救医疗技术员、学校警官、水管工)或女性化工作(如护士、教师、清洁人员)。在三种不同的性骚扰指控(如 unwanted romantic attention、身体抚摸、被展示色情图片)中,参与者报告称,从事男性化工作的女性比从事女性化工作的女性更不符合典型女性形象。此外,这些对典型性的认知影响了参与者对受害者性骚扰事件的看法。一个人越不认为受害者是典型的女性,就越不可能将受害者的经历认定为性骚扰。结果表明,对性骚扰的认知直接受到人们对受害者看法的影响。文中讨论了关于女性原型和性骚扰指控的相关影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c5/12190054/7a75637fb63d/behavsci-15-00757-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c5/12190054/0a4c0da6cea9/behavsci-15-00757-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c5/12190054/e873094eb602/behavsci-15-00757-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c5/12190054/7a75637fb63d/behavsci-15-00757-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c5/12190054/0a4c0da6cea9/behavsci-15-00757-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c5/12190054/e873094eb602/behavsci-15-00757-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c5/12190054/7a75637fb63d/behavsci-15-00757-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Do People Judge Sexual Harassment Differently Based on the Type of Job a Victim Has?人们会根据受害者的工作类型对性骚扰做出不同的评判吗?
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 1;15(6):757. doi: 10.3390/bs15060757.
2
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
3
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
A Pilot Study of Political Experiences and Barriers to Voting Among Autistic Adults Participating in Online Survey Research in the United States.一项针对参与美国在线调查研究的成年自闭症患者的政治经历和投票障碍的试点研究。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):261-272. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0119. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
6
Psychological interventions for adults who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending.针对有性犯罪行为或有性犯罪风险的成年人的心理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD007507. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007507.pub2.
7
What Matters Most? An Exploration of Quality of Life Through the Everyday Experiences of Autistic Young People and Adults.最重要的是什么?通过自闭症青少年和成年人的日常经历探索生活质量。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):312-323. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0127. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
How do transgender young people experience talking about trauma with services?跨性别青少年在与相关服务机构谈论创伤经历时是怎样的感受?
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 26:13591045251320673. doi: 10.1177/13591045251320673.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.

本文引用的文献

1
Is That Really Sexual Harassment? The Effect of a Victim's Sexual Orientation on How People View a Sexual Harassment Claim.那真的算是性骚扰吗?受害者性取向对人们如何看待性骚扰指控的影响。
J Homosex. 2025 Jan 2;72(1):20-44. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2024.2302428. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
2
Gender Prototypes Hinder Bystander Intervention in Women's Sexual Harassment.性别原型阻碍旁观者对女性性骚扰的干预。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2025 Jun;51(6):1007-1029. doi: 10.1177/01461672231203290. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
3
Gender as a social and structural variable: research perspectives from the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
性别作为一个社会和结构变量:来自美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)的研究视角。
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Jan 11;14(1):13-22. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad014.
4
Antecedents to Sexual Harassment of Women in Selected Male-Dominated Occupations: A Systematic Review.某些男性主导职业中对女性性骚扰的前因:系统评价。
Workplace Health Saf. 2023 Aug;71(8):356-365. doi: 10.1177/21650799231157085. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
5
How race and gender shape the development of social prototypes in the United States.种族和性别如何塑造美国社会原型的发展。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Aug;151(8):1956-1971. doi: 10.1037/xge0001164. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
6
Experiences of Gender Discrimination and Sexual Harassment Among Residents in General Surgery Programs Across the US.美国普通外科住院医师项目中性别歧视和性骚扰的经历。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Oct 1;156(10):942-952. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.3195.
7
Perception and experiences of sexual harassment among women working in hospitality workplaces of Bahir Dar city, Northwest Ethiopia: a qualitative study.埃塞俄比亚西北部巴赫达尔市酒店工作场所女性遭受性骚扰的认知与经历:一项定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 11;21(1):1119. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11173-1.
8
Narrow prototypes and neglected victims: Understanding perceptions of sexual harassment.狭窄的原型和被忽视的受害者:理解性骚扰的认知。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 May;122(5):873-893. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000260. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
9
Not Taking a Joke: The Influence of Target Status, Sex, and Age on Reactions to Workplace Humor.不拿别人开玩笑:目标地位、性别和年龄对工作场所幽默反应的影响。
Psychol Rep. 2021 Jun;124(3):1316-1334. doi: 10.1177/0033294120926671. Epub 2020 May 27.
10
Gender norms and social norms: differences, similarities and why they matter in prevention science.性别规范和社会规范:差异、相似之处,以及它们在预防科学中的重要性。
Sociol Health Illn. 2020 Feb;42(2):407-422. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13008. Epub 2019 Dec 13.