Suppr超能文献

混合塑料垃圾困境的生命周期评估答案:能量回收还是化学回收?

An LCA answer to the mixed plastics waste dilemma: Energy recovery or chemical recycling?

作者信息

Arena Umberto, Parrillo Francesco, Ardolino Filomena

机构信息

Department of Environmental, Biological, Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies - University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via Vivaldi, 43, 81100 Caserta, Italy.

Department of Environmental, Biological, Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies - University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via Vivaldi, 43, 81100 Caserta, Italy.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2023 Oct 19;171:662-675. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2023.10.011.

Abstract

The study focuses on mixed plastics waste (MPW), whose complex and unpredictable composition (due to high polymer heterogeneity, additives, and contaminants) makes its valorisation a true technical, environmental, economic, and regulatory challenge. Chemical recycling by means of advanced thermochemical treatments (ATT) could be a successful strategy, able to support the transition from a carbon intensive to a carbon negative sector, and alternative to the current treatments of energy recovery or mechanical downcycling. Some of these ATTs provide an efficient recovery of valuable resources, such as fuels and chemicals, but their role is mainly limited by time necessary to complete the process optimization and implement the required infrastructures. A reliable identification of the best alternatives is thus crucial. A specific LCA approach quantifies the environmental performances of a selected set of ATT technologies for resource recovery from MPW. It includes plastics-to-energy, by combustion or gasification; plastics-to-methane and plastics-to-hydrogen, by gasification; and plastics-to-oil, by thermal pyrolysis. The results highlight the crucial role of carbon capture and storage (CCS) units, which partially reduces that of the specific thermochemical treatment. The best performances, particularly for Climate Change category, are those of the MPW-to-hydrogen by gasification, followed by those of MPW-to-energy by combustion or gasification, all equipped with CCS. The sensitivity analysis considers the evolution of the European energy mix, characterised by a larger utilisation of renewable energy sources, and highlights the corresponding increased sustainability of chemical recycling by ATTs. This suggests that the MPW dilemma should be definitively solved in a close future.

摘要

该研究聚焦于混合塑料废弃物(MPW),其复杂且不可预测的成分(由于聚合物高度异质性、添加剂和污染物)使其增值成为一项真正的技术、环境、经济和监管挑战。通过先进热化学处理(ATT)进行化学回收可能是一种成功策略,能够支持从碳密集型向碳负性行业的转变,并替代当前的能源回收或机械降级循环处理方式。其中一些ATT能有效回收有价值的资源,如燃料和化学品,但其作用主要受限于完成工艺优化和建设所需基础设施的时间。因此,可靠识别最佳替代方案至关重要。一种特定的生命周期评估(LCA)方法量化了从MPW中回收资源的一组选定ATT技术的环境绩效。它包括通过燃烧或气化将塑料转化为能源;通过气化将塑料转化为甲烷和氢气;以及通过热解将塑料转化为油。结果凸显了碳捕获与封存(CCS)装置的关键作用,其部分降低了特定热化学处理的作用。最佳绩效,特别是在气候变化类别方面,是通过气化将MPW转化为氢气,其次是通过燃烧或气化将MPW转化为能源,所有这些都配备了CCS。敏感性分析考虑了以更大程度利用可再生能源为特征的欧洲能源结构的演变,并凸显了通过ATT进行化学回收相应增强的可持续性。这表明MPW困境应在不久的将来得到彻底解决。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验