Walichnowska Patrycja, Flizikowski Józef, Tomporowski Andrzej, Opielak Marek, Cieślik Wojciech
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Kaliskiego 7, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Faculty of Transport and Informatic, University of Economics and Innovation in Lublin (WSEI), Projektowa 4, 20-209 Lublin, Poland.
Polymers (Basel). 2025 Mar 5;17(5):690. doi: 10.3390/polym17050690.
The post-use management of plastic films, including shrink films, poses a significant environmental and technological challenge for the industry. Due to their durability and difficulty in degradation, these wastes contribute to environmental pollution, generating microplastics and greenhouse gas emissions during improper disposal. This paper examines different post-use management methods for shrink wrap, such as recycling, landfilling, and incineration, and assesses their impact on the environmental impact of the bottle packaging process using a life-cycle analysis (LCA). This study shows that the recycling option has the lowest potential environmental impact. Compared to other post-use management options, recycling reduces the potential environmental impact by more than 50%. The analysis also shows that the tested scenario using recycled film and photovoltaic energy has the lowest potential environmental impact. Using recycled film and powering the process with renewable energy reduces the potential environmental impact by about 95% compared to Scenario 1 and by about 85% in Scenario 3.
包括收缩膜在内的塑料薄膜的使用后管理,给该行业带来了重大的环境和技术挑战。由于其耐用性和降解困难,这些废物会造成环境污染,在不当处置过程中产生微塑料和温室气体排放。本文研究了收缩包装的不同使用后管理方法,如回收、填埋和焚烧,并使用生命周期分析(LCA)评估了它们对瓶装包装过程环境影响的影响。这项研究表明,回收选项对环境的潜在影响最低。与其他使用后管理选项相比,回收可将潜在环境影响降低50%以上。分析还表明,使用回收薄膜和光伏能源的测试场景对环境的潜在影响最低。与场景1相比,使用回收薄膜并使用可再生能源为该过程提供动力可将潜在环境影响降低约95%,在场景3中降低约85%。