• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作与公众对科学的理解。

Work and the public understanding of science.

机构信息

The University of Texas at Arlington, USA.

出版信息

Public Underst Sci. 2024 Apr;33(3):353-369. doi: 10.1177/09636625231203478. Epub 2023 Oct 21.

DOI:10.1177/09636625231203478
PMID:37865816
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10958755/
Abstract

This study examines whether engaging in science work and work that is substantively complex (e.g. requiring independent thought and judgment) is related to interest in science, science knowledge, and confidence in the scientific community in the United States. It also examines whether the conditions of work mediate the relationship between education and these science-related outcomes. Occupation-level data from O*NET are merged with survey data from the General Social Survey. Results indicate that science work is related to interest in science and science knowledge and that work complexity is related to confidence in the scientific community. Results offer only limited evidence of mediation-science work mediates the relationship between educational attainment and science knowledge but not the relationships involving interest or confidence. In sum, results indicate that the conditions of work are associated with science attitudes, and that researchers should examine these connections in future research.

摘要

本研究考察了从事科学工作和实质性复杂工作(例如需要独立思考和判断)是否与对科学的兴趣、科学知识以及对美国科学界的信心有关。它还考察了工作条件是否在教育和这些与科学相关的结果之间起到了中介作用。本研究将 O*NET 的职业数据与综合社会调查的调查数据进行了合并。结果表明,科学工作与对科学的兴趣和科学知识有关,工作复杂性与对科学界的信心有关。结果仅提供了有限的中介证据——科学工作在教育程度与科学知识之间起到了中介作用,但在兴趣或信心方面则没有起到中介作用。总之,结果表明工作条件与科学态度有关,研究人员应该在未来的研究中检验这些联系。

相似文献

1
Work and the public understanding of science.工作与公众对科学的理解。
Public Underst Sci. 2024 Apr;33(3):353-369. doi: 10.1177/09636625231203478. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
2
A science confidence gap: Education, trust in scientific methods, and trust in scientific institutions in the United States, 2014.科学信任差距:2014 年美国的科学教育、对科学方法的信任和对科学机构的信任。
Public Underst Sci. 2017 Aug;26(6):704-720. doi: 10.1177/0963662515617367. Epub 2015 Dec 6.
3
Placing "trust" in science: The urban-rural divide and Americans' feelings of warmth toward scientists.对科学的“信任”:城乡差距与美国人对科学家的好感度。
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Jul;32(5):596-604. doi: 10.1177/09636625221147232. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Public knowledge and public trust.公众认知与公众信任。
Community Genet. 2006;9(3):204-10. doi: 10.1159/000092658.
6
Trust in science, social consensus and vaccine confidence.信任科学、社会共识和疫苗信心。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Nov;5(11):1528-1534. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01115-7. Epub 2021 May 17.
7
The cultural authority of science: public trust and acceptance of organized science.科学的文化权威:公众对有组织的科学的信任和认可。
Public Underst Sci. 2011 Nov;20(6):751-70. doi: 10.1177/0963662510365246.
8
Measuring the perceived uncertainty of scientific evidence and its relationship to engagement with science.衡量科学证据的感知不确定性及其与公众参与科学的关系。
Public Underst Sci. 2016 Aug;25(6):638-55. doi: 10.1177/0963662515575253. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
9
Misinformation about COVID-19: evidence for differential latent profiles and a strong association with trust in science.关于 COVID-19 的错误信息:不同潜在特征的证据,以及与对科学的信任之间的强关联。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10103-x.
10
Attitudes to biotechnology: estimating the opinions of a better-informed public.对生物技术的态度:评估信息更灵通的公众的意见。
New Genet Soc. 2005 Apr;24(1):31-56. doi: 10.1080/14636770500037693.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of Citizen Science to Sheep as a Model to Sensitize Young Citizens to Biodiversity, Animal Welfare and the Social Utility of Research.公民科学在绵羊身上的应用:以此为模型让年轻公民认识生物多样性、动物福利及研究的社会效用。
Animals (Basel). 2025 Jan 14;15(2):201. doi: 10.3390/ani15020201.

本文引用的文献

1
Public trust and mistrust of climate science: A meta-narrative review.公众对气候科学的信任与不信任:一项元叙述性综述。
Public Underst Sci. 2022 Oct;31(7):832-846. doi: 10.1177/09636625221110028. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
2
The role of journalistic voice in communicating climate scepticism.新闻报道声音在传播气候怀疑论中的作用。
Public Underst Sci. 2022 Jul;31(5):563-571. doi: 10.1177/09636625221077826. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
3
Learning about climate politics during COP 21: Explaining a diminishing knowledge gap.学习《巴黎协定》第 21 次缔约方会议上的气候政治:解释知识差距缩小的原因。
Public Underst Sci. 2022 Jul;31(5):617-633. doi: 10.1177/09636625211068635. Epub 2022 Jan 30.
4
Visualizing science: The impact of infographics on free recall, elaboration, and attitude change for genetically modified foods news.可视化科学:信息图表对转基因食品新闻的自由回忆、详述和态度改变的影响
Public Underst Sci. 2022 Feb;31(2):168-178. doi: 10.1177/09636625211034651. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
5
Ignorance or culture war? Christian nationalism and scientific illiteracy.无知还是文化战争?基督教民族主义与科学素养匮乏。
Public Underst Sci. 2021 Nov;30(8):930-946. doi: 10.1177/09636625211006271. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
6
The nature and origins of political polarization over science.关于科学的政治两极分化的本质与根源。
Public Underst Sci. 2021 May;30(4):352-368. doi: 10.1177/0963662521989193. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
7
Science for good? The effects of education and national context on perceptions of science.科学为善?教育和国家背景对科学认知的影响。
Public Underst Sci. 2019 Nov;28(8):897-916. doi: 10.1177/0963662519863575. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
8
Explaining science funding attitudes in the United States: The case for science interest.解读美国对科学资金的态度:科学兴趣的案例
Public Underst Sci. 2019 Feb;28(2):161-176. doi: 10.1177/0963662518795397. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
9
Scienceblind: Why Our Intuitive Theories About the World Are So Often Wrong.《科学盲视:为何我们对世界的直观理论常常是错的》
Science. 2017 Apr 28;356(6336):385. doi: 10.1126/science.aan4200.
10
A science confidence gap: Education, trust in scientific methods, and trust in scientific institutions in the United States, 2014.科学信任差距:2014 年美国的科学教育、对科学方法的信任和对科学机构的信任。
Public Underst Sci. 2017 Aug;26(6):704-720. doi: 10.1177/0963662515617367. Epub 2015 Dec 6.