• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对科学的“信任”:城乡差距与美国人对科学家的好感度。

Placing "trust" in science: The urban-rural divide and Americans' feelings of warmth toward scientists.

机构信息

University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.

出版信息

Public Underst Sci. 2023 Jul;32(5):596-604. doi: 10.1177/09636625221147232. Epub 2023 Jan 17.

DOI:10.1177/09636625221147232
PMID:36648007
Abstract

Long-standing discussions of the so-called urban-rural divide in the United States have uncovered meaningful differences between urbanites and rural residents, but much of this work has focused on political attitudes. However, there is reason to believe that geographic divides also influence Americans' science attitudes, including, for example, positive affect toward scientists and levels of trust in them. Unfortunately, existing work has not clearly ruled out confounding factors such as religiosity, political views, media habits, and conspiracism. This brief article addresses this problem by drawing on survey data from 2016 to test the hypothesis that rural residency will be associated with colder feelings toward the scientific community, even with controls in place. The results offer support for this expectation. These findings lend support to recent arguments that rural Americans' science attitudes are influenced by factors that go beyond demographics, conspiracism, political polarization, differences of religiosity, and (partisan) media consumption.

摘要

长久以来,有关美国所谓的城乡差距的讨论揭示了城市居民和农村居民之间存在显著差异,但其中大部分工作都集中在政治态度上。然而,有理由相信,地理差异也会影响美国人的科学态度,包括对科学家的积极态度和对他们的信任程度。不幸的是,现有研究尚未明确排除宗教信仰、政治观点、媒体习惯和阴谋论等混杂因素。本文通过利用 2016 年的调查数据来解决这个问题,检验了这样一个假设,即农村居住与对科学界更冷淡的态度有关,即使控制了这些因素。结果支持了这一假设。这些发现支持了最近的一些观点,即农村美国人的科学态度受到超出人口统计学、阴谋论、政治两极化、宗教差异和(党派)媒体消费等因素的影响。

相似文献

1
Placing "trust" in science: The urban-rural divide and Americans' feelings of warmth toward scientists.对科学的“信任”:城乡差距与美国人对科学家的好感度。
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Jul;32(5):596-604. doi: 10.1177/09636625221147232. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
2
Understanding public opinion in debates over biomedical research: looking beyond political partisanship to focus on beliefs about science and society.理解生物医学研究辩论中的公众舆论:超越政治党派之争,关注对科学与社会的信念。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 18;9(2):e88473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088473. eCollection 2014.
3
Social Trust in Polarized Times: How Perceptions of Political Polarization Affect Americans' Trust in Each Other.两极分化时代的社会信任:对政治两极分化的认知如何影响美国人对彼此的信任。
Polit Behav. 2022;44(3):1533-1554. doi: 10.1007/s11109-022-09787-1. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
4
Political probity increases trust in government: Evidence from randomized survey experiments.政治廉洁度提高民众对政府的信任:来自随机调查实验的证据。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 24;15(2):e0225818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225818. eCollection 2020.
5
An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming.对科学的攻击?媒体使用、对科学家的信任以及对全球变暖的认知。
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Oct;23(7):866-83. doi: 10.1177/0963662513480091. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
6
Resentment Is Like Drinking Poison? The Heterogeneous Health Effects of Affective Polarization.怨恨如同饮鸩?情感极化的非一致性健康效应。
J Health Soc Behav. 2022 Dec;63(4):508-524. doi: 10.1177/00221465221075311. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
7
Model uncertainty, political contestation, and public trust in science: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic.模型不确定性、政治争议与公众对科学的信任:来自新冠疫情的证据。
Sci Adv. 2020 Oct 21;6(43). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd4563. Print 2020 Oct.
8
How people decide who is correct when groups of scientists disagree.当科学家群体意见不一致时,人们如何决定谁是正确的。
Risk Anal. 2024 Apr;44(4):918-938. doi: 10.1111/risa.14204. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
9
Place matters: Contextualizing the roles of religion and race for understanding Americans' attitudes about homosexuality.地点很重要:将宗教和种族的作用置于背景中以理解美国人对同性恋的态度。
Soc Sci Res. 2016 May;57:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
10
Belief in public efficacy, trust, and attitudes toward modern genetic science.对公众效能的信念、信任以及对现代基因科学的态度。
Risk Anal. 2007 Aug;27(4):921-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00932.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Building trust in rural communities: recruitment and retention strategies in developmental science.在农村社区建立信任:发展科学中的招募与留用策略
Front Public Health. 2025 May 7;13:1586988. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1586988. eCollection 2025.
2
Cancer in rural America: Improving access to clinical trials and quality of oncologic care.美国农村地区的癌症:改善临床试验的可及性和肿瘤护理质量。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2025 Jul-Aug;75(4):341-361. doi: 10.3322/caac.70006. Epub 2025 Mar 27.