• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

互联网使用对化肥和农药投入的影响研究:来自中国的实证证据。

Research on the impact of internet use on fertilizer and pesticide inputs: Empirical evidence from China.

作者信息

Na Hui, Kang Jiaxi

机构信息

School of Economics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.

School of Economics & Management, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, 730070, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 Oct 9;9(10):e20816. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20816. eCollection 2023 Oct.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20816
PMID:37867797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10585294/
Abstract

Fertilizers and pesticides are important agricultural production materials. Excessive use of fertilizers and pesticides can cause negative impacts such as decline in the quality of farm products and damage to the ecological environment. Increasing the efficiency of fertilizers and pesticides is an important step to accelerate the green transformation of agriculture. Using data from the 2015 China Household Finance Survey, this paper analyzes the impacts of Internet use on fertilizers and pesticides by farmers, and the mechanism behind the action with the help of the propensity score matching method and the instrumental variable method. The findings are: (1) Farmers who use the Internet have greater inputs of fertilizers and pesticides compared to farmers who do not use the Internet. (2) Farmers who do not use the Internet would have their inputs of fertilizers and pesticides increased by 21.9% and 47.7%, respectively, if they had used the Internet under the counterfactual hypothesis. (3) In the heterogeneity analysis, Internet use plays a positive and significant role in the inputs of fertilizer and pesticide in the eastern part of China, and Internet use has greater impact on pesticide inputs than on fertilizer in central and western regions. (4) Internet use has a positive and significant effect on fertilizer and pesticide inputs in both lower scale and higher scale operations, and a positive but not significant effect in moderate-scale operations.

摘要

化肥和农药是重要的农业生产资料。过量使用化肥和农药会造成农产品质量下降、生态环境破坏等负面影响。提高化肥和农药使用效率是加快农业绿色转型的重要举措。本文利用2015年中国家庭金融调查数据,借助倾向得分匹配法和工具变量法,分析了农民使用互联网对化肥和农药使用的影响及其作用机制。研究发现:(1)使用互联网的农民比不使用互联网的农民在化肥和农药上的投入更多。(2)在反事实假设下,如果不使用互联网的农民使用互联网,他们在化肥和农药上的投入将分别增加21.9%和47.7%。(3)在异质性分析中,互联网使用在中国东部地区的化肥和农药投入中发挥了积极且显著的作用,在中西部地区,互联网使用对农药投入的影响大于对化肥投入的影响。(4)互联网使用在小规模和大规模经营中对化肥和农药投入均有积极且显著的影响,在中等规模经营中则有积极但不显著的影响。

相似文献

1
Research on the impact of internet use on fertilizer and pesticide inputs: Empirical evidence from China.互联网使用对化肥和农药投入的影响研究:来自中国的实证证据。
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 9;9(10):e20816. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20816. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Does dual reduction in chemical fertilizer and pesticides improve nutrient loss and tea yield and quality? A pilot study in a green tea garden in Shaoxing, Zhejiang Province, China.化肥和农药双减是否能提高养分流失和茶叶产量与质量?来自中国浙江绍兴绿茶园的一项试点研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jan;26(3):2464-2476. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3732-1. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
3
A Study on the Impact of Low-Carbon Technology Application in Agriculture on the Returns of Large-Scale Farmers.农业低碳技术应用对规模农户收益的影响研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 17;19(16):10177. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610177.
4
The empirical effect of agricultural social services on pesticide inputs.农业社会化服务对农药投入的实证影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 10;14(1):15907. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67016-7.
5
Effect of the grain-growing purpose and farm size on the ability of stable land property rights to encourage farmers to apply organic fertilizers.粮食种植目的和农场规模对稳定土地产权鼓励农民施用有机肥能力的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Dec 1;251:109621. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109621. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
6
[Ecological compensation based on farmers' willingness: A case study of Jingsan County in Hubei Province, China].基于农民意愿的生态补偿:以中国湖北省京山县为例
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2015 Jan;26(1):215-23.
7
Does Internet use reduce chemical fertilizer use? Evidence from rural households in China.互联网使用会减少化肥使用吗?来自中国农村家庭的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb;28(5):6005-6017. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10944-4. Epub 2020 Sep 26.
8
Can internet use promote farmers to adopt chemical fertilizer reduction and efficiency enhancement technology in China?-an empirical analysis based on endogenous switching probit model.互联网使用能否促进中国农民采用化肥减施增效技术?——基于内生转换 Probit 模型的实证分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 30;19(8):e0308300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308300. eCollection 2024.
9
Fertilizer and pesticide reduction in cherry tomato production to achieve multiple environmental benefits in Guangxi, China.在广西,减少樱桃番茄生产中的化肥和农药用量,实现多种环境效益。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Nov 1;793:148527. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148527. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
10
Rational trade-offs between yield increase and fertilizer inputs are essential for sustainable intensification: A case study in wheat-maize cropping systems in China.在提高产量和减少化肥投入之间进行合理权衡对于可持续集约化至关重要:以中国小麦-玉米轮作系统为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Aug 20;679:328-336. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.085. Epub 2019 May 8.

本文引用的文献

1
More Land, Less Pollution? How Land Transfer Affects Fertilizer Application.更多的土地,更少的污染?土地流转如何影响化肥施用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 27;18(21):11268. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111268.
2
Evolution and Efficiency Assessment of Pesticide and Fertiliser Inputs to Cultivated Land in China.中国耕地投入农药和化肥的演变及效率评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 4;18(7):3771. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073771.
3
Spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors of fertilizer reduction control in Zhejiang Province.
浙江省肥料减控的时空演变及驱动因素。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Apr 10;660:650-659. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.420. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
4
Policy distortions, farm size, and the overuse of agricultural chemicals in China.政策扭曲、农场规模与中国农用化学品过度使用
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 3;115(27):7010-7015. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1806645115. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
5
Overuse or underuse? An observation of pesticide use in China.过度使用还是未充分利用?中国农药使用的观察。
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Dec 15;538:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.031. Epub 2015 Aug 22.
6
Chemical usage in production agriculture: do crop insurance and off-farm work play a part?农业生产中的化学品使用:作物保险和非农就业是否起作用?
J Environ Manage. 2012 Aug 30;105:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.03.038. Epub 2012 Apr 23.