• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

更多的土地,更少的污染?土地流转如何影响化肥施用。

More Land, Less Pollution? How Land Transfer Affects Fertilizer Application.

机构信息

China Western Economic Research Center, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 610074, China.

Business School, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 27;18(21):11268. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111268.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph182111268
PMID:34769786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8583344/
Abstract

Reducing fertilizer use is key to curbing agricultural pollution and ensuring food safety. Land transfer enables farmers to obtain a more appropriate production scale, but its effect on the intensity of fertilizer application is not theoretically certain. On one hand, farmers with more land may adopt more scientific production methods, thus reducing the use of chemical fertilizers. On the other hand, the short-term behavior of land grantees on transferred land may increase fertilizer use intensity. This paper attempts to theoretically elucidate the specific mechanisms by which land transfer affects the intensity of fertilizer application and to verify the relationship between the two using data from fixed rural observation sites across China from 2011-2014 with the fixed-effects model and the mediating effect model. This paper concludes that (1) land transfer significantly reduces the intensity of fertilizer use; (2) land transfer increases the land size and promotes the use of machinery by farmers, but only the increase in land size further reduces the intensity of fertilizer application; (3) the effect of land transfer on fertilizer application intensity is significant only for food crops and not for cash crops, and (4) the effect of land transfer on fertilizer application intensity is most pronounced in western China, where land fragmentation is the severest and insignificant in eastern China, where agricultural modernization is more advanced.

摘要

减少化肥使用量是遏制农业面源污染、保障食品安全的关键。土地流转使农民能够获得更适宜的生产规模,但它对化肥施用强度的影响在理论上并不确定。一方面,拥有更多土地的农民可能会采用更科学的生产方式,从而减少化肥的使用。另一方面,转入土地的土地受让人的短期行为可能会增加化肥的使用强度。本文试图从理论上阐明土地流转影响化肥施用强度的具体机制,并利用 2011-2014 年中国固定农村观测点的数据,采用固定效应模型和中介效应模型,验证两者之间的关系。本文得出以下结论:(1)土地流转显著降低了化肥施用强度;(2)土地流转增加了农户的土地规模并促进了机械的使用,但只有土地规模的增加才会进一步降低化肥施用强度;(3)土地流转对化肥施用强度的影响仅在粮食作物中显著,而在经济作物中不显著;(4)土地流转对化肥施用强度的影响在土地细碎化最严重的西部地区最为显著,而在农业现代化程度较高的东部地区则不显著。

相似文献

1
More Land, Less Pollution? How Land Transfer Affects Fertilizer Application.更多的土地,更少的污染?土地流转如何影响化肥施用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 27;18(21):11268. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111268.
2
Effect of the grain-growing purpose and farm size on the ability of stable land property rights to encourage farmers to apply organic fertilizers.粮食种植目的和农场规模对稳定土地产权鼓励农民施用有机肥能力的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Dec 1;251:109621. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109621. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
3
Effect of Farmland Scale on Farmers' Application Behavior with Organic Fertilizer.农田规模对农户有机肥施用行为的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 19;19(9):4967. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19094967.
4
Impact of Agricultural Division of Labor on Fertilizer Reduction Application: Evidence from Western China.农业分工对化肥减施的影响——来自中国西部的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 21;20(5):3787. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053787.
5
Fertilizer overuse in Chinese smallholders due to lack of fixed inputs.由于缺乏固定投入,中国小农户过度使用化肥。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Sep 1;293:112913. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112913. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
6
Effects of risk perception and agricultural socialized services on farmers' organic fertilizer application behavior: Evidence from Shandong Province, China.风险感知和农业社会化服务对农户有机肥施用行为的影响——来自山东省的证据。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 23;11:1056678. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1056678. eCollection 2023.
7
Land Fragmentation, Technology Adoption and Chemical Fertilizer Application: Evidence from China.土地破碎化、技术采纳与化肥施用:来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 2;19(13):8147. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138147.
8
Land Tenure and Green Production Behavior: Empirical Analysis Based on Fertilizer Use by Cotton Farmers in China.土地产权与绿色生产行为——基于中国棉农化肥使用的实证分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 28;18(9):4677. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094677.
9
Can Agricultural Socialized Services Promote the Reduction in Chemical Fertilizer? Analysis Based on the Moderating Effect of Farm Size.农业社会化服务能否促进化肥减量?基于农地规模的调节效应分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 28;20(3):2323. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032323.
10
Effect of agricultural subsidies on the use of chemical fertilizer.农业补贴对化肥使用的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Dec 1;299:113621. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113621. Epub 2021 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors of agricultural land transfer in China.中国农地流转的时空演变及其驱动因素。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 18;19(9):e0310532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310532. eCollection 2024.
2
Research on the impact of internet use on fertilizer and pesticide inputs: Empirical evidence from China.互联网使用对化肥和农药投入的影响研究:来自中国的实证证据。
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 9;9(10):e20816. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20816. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Environmental regulation and high-quality agricultural development.环境规制与高质量农业发展。
PLoS One. 2023 May 12;18(5):e0285687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285687. eCollection 2023.
4
Growth changes of tomato seedlings responding to sodium salt of α-naphthalene acetic acid and potassium salt of fulvic acid.番茄幼苗对α-萘乙酸钠盐和腐植酸钾的生长变化响应。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 10;13(1):4024. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31023-x.
5
Does farmland inflow improve the green total factor productivity of farmers in China? An empirical analysis based on a propensity score matching method.农地流入是否提高了中国农户的绿色全要素生产率?基于倾向得分匹配法的实证分析
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 15;9(3):e13750. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13750. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
The Impact of Different Uses of the Internet on Farmers' Adoption of Soil Testing and Formulated Fertilization Technology in Rural China.互联网使用方式对中国农村农民采用测土配方施肥技术的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 29;20(1):562. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010562.
7
A study of the impact of land transfer decisions on household income in rural China.中国农村土地流转决策对农户收入的影响研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 20;17(10):e0276559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276559. eCollection 2022.
8
Assessing the Relationship among Land Transfer, Fertilizer Usage, and PM Pollution: Evidence from Rural China.评估土地流转、化肥使用与 PM 污染之间的关系:来自中国农村的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 8;19(14):8387. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148387.

本文引用的文献

1
Expatiating the impact of anthropogenic aspects and climatic factors on long-term soil monitoring and management.阐述人为因素和气候因素对长期土壤监测和管理的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jun;28(24):30528-30550. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14127-7. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
2
Policy distortions, farm size, and the overuse of agricultural chemicals in China.政策扭曲、农场规模与中国农用化学品过度使用
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 3;115(27):7010-7015. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1806645115. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
3
An Analysis of China's Fertilizer Policies: Impacts on the Industry, Food Security, and the Environment.中国肥料政策分析:对产业、粮食安全和环境的影响。
J Environ Qual. 2013 Jul;42(4):972-81. doi: 10.2134/jeq2012.0465.
4
Current Directions in Mediation Analysis.中介分析的当前发展方向。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2009 Feb 1;18(1):16. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01598.x.
5
Agriculture. Nutrient imbalances in agricultural development.农业。农业发展中的养分失衡。
Science. 2009 Jun 19;324(5934):1519-20. doi: 10.1126/science.1170261.
6
Lower level mediation in multilevel models.多层次模型中的低层次中介作用。
Psychol Methods. 2003 Jun;8(2):115-28. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.8.2.115.
7
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.社会心理学研究中的调节变量与中介变量区分:概念、策略及统计考量
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173.