• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

政策扭曲、农场规模与中国农用化学品过度使用

Policy distortions, farm size, and the overuse of agricultural chemicals in China.

机构信息

Policy Simulation Laboratory, Zhejiang University, 310058 Hangzhou, China.

China Center for Economic Studies, School of Economics, Fudan University, 200433 Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 3;115(27):7010-7015. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1806645115. Epub 2018 Jun 18.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1806645115
PMID:29915067
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6142251/
Abstract

Understanding the reasons for overuse of agricultural chemicals is critical to the sustainable development of Chinese agriculture. Using a nationally representative rural household survey from China, we found that farm size is a strong factor that affects the use intensity of agricultural chemicals across farms in China. Statistically, a 1% increase in farm size is associated with a 0.3% and 0.5% decrease in fertilizer and pesticide use per hectare ( < 0.001), respectively, and an almost 1% increase in agricultural labor productivity, while it only leads to a statistically insignificant 0.02% decrease in crop yields. The same pattern was also found using other independently collected data sources from China and an international panel analysis of 74 countries from the 1960s to the 2000s. While economic growth has been associated with increasing farm size in many other countries, in China this relationship has been distorted by land and migration policies, leading to the persistence of small farm size in China. Removing these distortions would decrease agricultural chemical use by 30-50% and the environmental impact of those chemicals by 50% while doubling the total income of all farmers including those who move to urban areas. Removing policy distortions is also likely to complement other remedies to the overuse problem, such as easing farmer's access to modern technologies and knowledge, and improving environmental regulation and enforcement.

摘要

理解过度使用农用化学品的原因对中国农业的可持续发展至关重要。利用一项具有全国代表性的中国农村家庭调查,我们发现,农场规模是影响中国农场农用化学品使用强度的一个重要因素。从统计学上看,农场规模每增加 1%,化肥和农药的使用量(<0.001)就会分别减少 0.3%和 0.5%,农业劳动生产率几乎会增加 1%,而农作物产量仅会减少 0.02%,但这一减少并不具有统计学意义。利用来自中国的其他独立收集的数据来源和对 20 世纪 60 年代至 2000 年代 74 个国家的国际面板分析,也发现了同样的模式。虽然在许多其他国家,经济增长与农场规模的扩大有关,但在中国,土地和移民政策扭曲了这种关系,导致中国的农场规模一直保持较小。消除这些扭曲将使农业化学品的使用减少 30-50%,这些化学品对环境的影响减少 50%,同时使包括转移到城市地区的农民在内的所有农民的总收入增加一倍。消除政策扭曲也可能补充解决过度使用问题的其他措施,例如,减轻农民获取现代技术和知识的难度,并改善环境监管和执法力度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e5/6142251/a5ded9a01fea/pnas.1806645115fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e5/6142251/36cbc4461e10/pnas.1806645115fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e5/6142251/205cac8a3771/pnas.1806645115fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e5/6142251/a5ded9a01fea/pnas.1806645115fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e5/6142251/36cbc4461e10/pnas.1806645115fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e5/6142251/205cac8a3771/pnas.1806645115fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e5/6142251/a5ded9a01fea/pnas.1806645115fig03.jpg

相似文献

1
Policy distortions, farm size, and the overuse of agricultural chemicals in China.政策扭曲、农场规模与中国农用化学品过度使用
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 3;115(27):7010-7015. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1806645115. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
2
Fertilizer overuse in Chinese smallholders due to lack of fixed inputs.由于缺乏固定投入,中国小农户过度使用化肥。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Sep 1;293:112913. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112913. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
3
Effect of the grain-growing purpose and farm size on the ability of stable land property rights to encourage farmers to apply organic fertilizers.粮食种植目的和农场规模对稳定土地产权鼓励农民施用有机肥能力的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Dec 1;251:109621. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109621. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
4
Do farmers misuse pesticides in crop production in China? Evidence from a farm household survey.中国农户在农作物生产中是否滥用农药?来自农户调查的证据。
Pest Manag Sci. 2019 Aug;75(8):2133-2141. doi: 10.1002/ps.5332. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
5
Effect of agricultural subsidies on the use of chemical fertilizer.农业补贴对化肥使用的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Dec 1;299:113621. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113621. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
6
[Nitrogen flow characteristic and use efficiency in mixed crop-livestock system in North China Plain: Hebei Jinlong Circular Agriculture Farm as an example].[华北平原农牧结合系统中氮素流动特征与利用效率——以河北金龙循环农业农场为例]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2017 Apr 18;28(4):1281-1288. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201704.029.
7
Economic Performance and Sustainability of a Novel Intercropping System on the North China Plain.华北平原一种新型间作系统的经济表现与可持续性
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 14;10(8):e0135518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135518. eCollection 2015.
8
Food security and overuse of agrochemicals: evidence from China's major grain-producing areas policy.粮食安全与农药过度使用:来自中国主要粮食产区政策的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 May;30(23):64443-64459. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26620-2. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
9
Can Agricultural Socialized Services Promote the Reduction in Chemical Fertilizer? Analysis Based on the Moderating Effect of Farm Size.农业社会化服务能否促进化肥减量?基于农地规模的调节效应分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 28;20(3):2323. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032323.
10
Sustainability of farmers' soil fertility management practices: a case study in the North China Plain.农民土壤肥力管理实践的可持续性:以华北平原为例
J Environ Manage. 2006 Jun;79(4):409-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.08.009. Epub 2005 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Occupational health risk of farmers: A qualitative study with the agriculture society of trinidad and tobago and the ministry of agriculture, land and fisheries.农民的职业健康风险:对特立尼达和多巴哥农业协会以及农业、土地和渔业部的定性研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 2;20(7):e0327283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327283. eCollection 2025.
2
Intergenerational and transgenerational effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the offspring brain development and behavior.内分泌干扰化学物质对后代大脑发育和行为的代际及跨代影响。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 May 21;16:1571689. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1571689. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Pursuing sustainable productivity with millions of smallholder farmers.与数以百万计的小农一起追求可持续生产力。
Nature. 2018 Mar 15;555(7696):363-366. doi: 10.1038/nature25785. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
2
Closing yield gaps in China by empowering smallholder farmers.通过赋权小农来弥合中国的产量差距。
Nature. 2016 Sep 29;537(7622):671-674. doi: 10.1038/nature19368. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
3
Managing nitrogen for sustainable development.管理氮素以实现可持续发展。
Smart agriculture in Asia.
亚洲的智慧农业。
Plant Commun. 2025 Jul 14;6(7):101377. doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2025.101377. Epub 2025 May 15.
4
Evaluation of Low-Cost Multi-Spectral Sensors for Measuring Chlorophyll Levels Across Diverse Leaf Types.用于测量不同叶型叶绿素水平的低成本多光谱传感器评估
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Mar 31;25(7):2198. doi: 10.3390/s25072198.
5
Optimal farm size reduces global poverty-induced soil antibiotic exposure risk.最佳农场规模可降低全球贫困导致的土壤抗生素暴露风险。
Nat Food. 2025 Apr;6(4):353-364. doi: 10.1038/s43016-025-01131-0. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
6
Balancing Health and Sustainability: Assessing the Benefits of Plant-Based Diets and the Risk of Pesticide Residues.平衡健康与可持续性:评估植物性饮食的益处及农药残留风险
Nutrients. 2025 Feb 19;17(4):727. doi: 10.3390/nu17040727.
7
Sustainable management of riverine NO emission baselines.河流一氧化氮排放基线的可持续管理。
Natl Sci Rev. 2024 Dec 11;12(2):nwae458. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwae458. eCollection 2025 Feb.
8
Inequality in agricultural greenhouse gas emissions intensity has risen in rural China from 1993 to 2020.中国农村地区农业温室气体排放强度的不平等程度从 1993 年到 2020 年有所上升。
Nat Food. 2024 Nov;5(11):916-928. doi: 10.1038/s43016-024-01071-1. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
9
Unlocking nitrogen management potential via large-scale farming for air quality and substantial co-benefits.通过大规模农业实现氮管理潜力,改善空气质量并带来显著协同效益。
Natl Sci Rev. 2024 Sep 13;11(10):nwae324. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwae324. eCollection 2024 Oct.
10
Measurement and analysis of the distortion of factor prices in China.中国要素价格扭曲的度量与分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 23;19(7):e0302825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302825. eCollection 2024.
Nature. 2015 Dec 3;528(7580):51-9. doi: 10.1038/nature15743. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
4
Integrated reactive nitrogen budgets and future trends in China.中国的综合活性氮预算及未来趋势
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jul 14;112(28):8792-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510211112. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
5
Producing more grain with lower environmental costs.以更低的环境代价生产更多粮食。
Nature. 2014 Oct 23;514(7523):486-9. doi: 10.1038/nature13609. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
6
Microeconomics of Technology Adoption.技术采用的微观经济学
Annu Rev Econom. 2010 Sep 1;2. doi: 10.1146/annurev.economics.102308.124433.
7
Consequences of human modification of the global nitrogen cycle.人类活动对全球氮循环的影响。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 May 27;368(1621):20130116. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0116. Print 2013 Jul 5.
8
Chinese agriculture: An experiment for the world.中国农业:一场面向世界的试验。
Nature. 2013 May 2;497(7447):33-5. doi: 10.1038/497033a.
9
Protecting the environment and public health from pesticides.保护环境和公众健康免受农药危害。
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Jun 5;46(11):5658-9. doi: 10.1021/es301652v. Epub 2012 May 7.
10
Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people.食品安全:养活 90 亿人的挑战。
Science. 2010 Feb 12;327(5967):812-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1185383. Epub 2010 Jan 28.