• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于缺血性中风有效治疗的即时护理基因检测的开发:基于早期模型的成本效益分析

Development of a point-of-care genetic test for effective treatment of ischaemic stroke: an early model-based cost-effectiveness analysis.

作者信息

Wright Stuart, McDermott John, Sen Dwaipayan, Smith Craig, Newman William, Payne Katherine

机构信息

Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M139PL, UK.

Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

出版信息

Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Apr 24;8:183. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19202.1. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19202.1
PMID:37869733
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10587658/
Abstract

People who have experienced a stroke are at high risk of recurrent strokes. Clopidogrel is prescribed to people who have had a non-cardioembolic stroke. There is evidence that clopidogrel is not effective for patients with loss-of-function alleles. Pharmacogenetic testing is a potential strategy to identify such patients and guide prescription of appropriate antiplatelet treatment. This study aimed to provide an early estimate of the cost-effectiveness of using a point-of-care pharmacogenetic test in the UK National Health System. A decision-analytic model comprising a linked decision tree and Markov model were created in R comparing pharmacogenetic testing with current prescribing practice. In the pharmacogenetic testing arm, patients identified to have one of three loss-of-function alleles were prescribed modified-release dipyridamole and aspirin or aspirin alone. Indicative data were sourced from reviews of the literature supported by expert consultation to select the most appropriate value for the input parameters. The healthcare costs (£;2021) and quality adjusted life years resulting from each strategy were estimated and the incremental cost-effectiveness of testing calculated. Deterministic threshold analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was conducted to account for uncertainty in the parameter estimates. The pharmacogenetic testing strategy generated 0.107 additional QALYs per patient tested and saved £512. Pharmacogenetic testing dominated current prescribing practice. The results were robust to extreme changes in key input variables. The PSA suggested that there was a 77% chance that pharmacogenetic testing would be cost-effective with a 62% chance it is cost-saving. A point-of-care pharmacogenetic test to guide prescription of clopidogrel for people who have experienced a stroke has the potential to provide a significant health gain by preventing secondary strokes and may save resources in the health system. This early economic analysis has also informed the direction for future research.

摘要

经历过中风的人再次中风的风险很高。氯吡格雷被开给患有非心源性栓塞性中风的人。有证据表明,氯吡格雷对功能缺失等位基因的患者无效。药物遗传学检测是识别此类患者并指导适当抗血小板治疗处方的潜在策略。本研究旨在对在英国国家医疗服务体系中使用即时检验药物遗传学检测的成本效益进行早期评估。在R语言中创建了一个由链接决策树和马尔可夫模型组成的决策分析模型,将药物遗传学检测与当前的处方实践进行比较。在药物遗传学检测组中,被确定有三种功能缺失等位基因之一的患者被开给缓释双嘧达莫和阿司匹林或仅开阿司匹林。指示性数据来自文献综述,并经专家咨询支持,以选择最合适的输入参数值。估计了每种策略产生的医疗保健成本(£;2021年)和质量调整生命年,并计算了检测的增量成本效益。进行了确定性阈值分析和概率敏感性分析(PSA),以考虑参数估计中的不确定性。药物遗传学检测策略为每位接受检测的患者额外产生了0.107个质量调整生命年,并节省了512英镑。药物遗传学检测优于当前的处方实践。结果对关键输入变量的极端变化具有稳健性。PSA表明,药物遗传学检测具有成本效益的概率为77%,节省成本的概率为62%。一种用于指导中风患者氯吡格雷处方的即时检验药物遗传学检测有可能通过预防二次中风带来显著的健康益处,并可能节省卫生系统的资源。这项早期经济分析也为未来的研究方向提供了参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2a5/10587658/402478931c60/wellcomeopenres-8-21284-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2a5/10587658/88ca2bf5e73b/wellcomeopenres-8-21284-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2a5/10587658/f77283d34439/wellcomeopenres-8-21284-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2a5/10587658/402478931c60/wellcomeopenres-8-21284-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2a5/10587658/88ca2bf5e73b/wellcomeopenres-8-21284-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2a5/10587658/f77283d34439/wellcomeopenres-8-21284-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2a5/10587658/402478931c60/wellcomeopenres-8-21284-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a point-of-care genetic test for effective treatment of ischaemic stroke: an early model-based cost-effectiveness analysis.用于缺血性中风有效治疗的即时护理基因检测的开发:基于早期模型的成本效益分析
Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Apr 24;8:183. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19202.1. eCollection 2023.
2
Clopidogrel and modified-release dipyridamole for the prevention of occlusive vascular events (review of Technology Appraisal No. 90): a systematic review and economic analysis.氯吡格雷和双嘧达莫缓释制剂预防闭塞性血管事件(技术评估 90 号回顾):系统评价和经济分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Sep;15(31):1-178. doi: 10.3310/hta15310.
3
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel and modified-release dipyridamole in the secondary prevention of occlusive vascular events: a systematic review and economic evaluation.氯吡格雷与缓释双嘧达莫在闭塞性血管事件二级预防中的临床疗效与成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Oct;8(38):iii-iv, 1-196. doi: 10.3310/hta8380.
4
Cost-effectiveness of CYP2C19 genotyping to guide antiplatelet therapy for acute minor stroke and high-risk transient ischemic attack.CYP2C19 基因分型指导急性小卒中和高危短暂性脑缺血发作抗血小板治疗的成本效益。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 1;11(1):7383. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86824-9.
5
Cost-effectiveness of testing for CYP2C19 loss-of-function carriers following transient ischemic attack/minor stroke: A Canadian perspective.短暂性脑缺血发作/小卒中后检测 CYP2C19 失活携带者的成本效益:加拿大视角。
Int J Stroke. 2023 Apr;18(4):416-425. doi: 10.1177/17474930221111898. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of antiplatelet therapy in the prevention of recurrent stroke in the UK. Aspirin, dipyridamole and aspirin-dipyridamole.英国抗血小板治疗预防复发性卒中的成本效益分析。阿司匹林、双嘧达莫及阿司匹林-双嘧达莫。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Nov;16(5 Pt 2):577-93. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199916050-00013.
7
An Evaluation of the Cost-effectiveness of Comprehensive MTM Integrated with Point-of-Care Phenotypic and Genetic Testing for U.S. Elderly Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后美国老年患者综合用药管理联合即时表型和基因检测的成本效果评价
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Feb;24(2):142-152. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.2.142.
8
Multi-gene Pharmacogenomic Testing That Includes Decision-Support Tools to Guide Medication Selection for Major Depression: A Health Technology Assessment.多基因药物基因组学检测,包括用于指导抗抑郁药物选择的决策支持工具:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2021 Aug 12;21(13):1-214. eCollection 2021.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Multigene Pharmacogenetic Testing in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者多基因药物遗传学检测的成本效益。
Value Health. 2020 Jan;23(1):61-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
10
Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin for the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome After a 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis From China Payer's Perspective.氯吡格雷与阿司匹林治疗双抗血小板治疗 12 个月后的急性冠状动脉综合征:中国支付方视角的成本效果分析。
Clin Ther. 2018 Dec;40(12):2125-2137. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.10.018. Epub 2018 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of Pharmacogenotyping and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Chronic Pain Management.慢性疼痛管理中药理基因分型与患者报告结局的关联
Health Serv Insights. 2025 Jul 12;18:11786329251356560. doi: 10.1177/11786329251356560. eCollection 2025.
2
CYP2C19 point-of-care testing: where are we now and where should we go?CYP2C19即时检验:我们目前的状况及未来的方向?
Pharmacogenomics J. 2025 Jun 13;25(4):16. doi: 10.1038/s41397-025-00375-0.
3
A review of clopidogrel resistance in lower extremity arterial disease.下肢动脉疾病中氯吡格雷抵抗的综述。

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of testing for CYP2C19 loss-of-function carriers following transient ischemic attack/minor stroke: A Canadian perspective.短暂性脑缺血发作/小卒中后检测 CYP2C19 失活携带者的成本效益:加拿大视角。
Int J Stroke. 2023 Apr;18(4):416-425. doi: 10.1177/17474930221111898. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
2
Impact of CYP2C19 metaboliser status on SSRI response: a retrospective study of 9500 participants of the Australian Genetics of Depression Study.CYP2C19 代谢酶表型对 SSRI 反应的影响:澳大利亚抑郁症遗传学研究中 9500 名参与者的回顾性研究。
Pharmacogenomics J. 2022 Mar;22(2):130-135. doi: 10.1038/s41397-022-00267-7. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
3
JVS Vasc Insights. 2024;2:100112. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsvi.2024.100112.
4
Development and Validation of a Rapid Point-of-Care CYP2C19 Genotyping Platform.即时检测CYP2C19基因分型快速平台的开发与验证
J Mol Diagn. 2025 Mar;27(3):209-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.12.001. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
5
Advancing pharmacogenomics research: automated extraction of insights from PubMed using SpaCy NLP framework.推进药物基因组学研究:使用SpaCy自然语言处理框架从PubMed中自动提取见解。
Pharmacogenomics. 2024;25(14-15):573-578. doi: 10.1080/14622416.2024.2429946. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
6
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel resistance genotype testing after ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack: a systematic review and economic model.缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作后氯吡格雷抵抗基因型检测的临床和成本效益:系统评价和经济模型。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Sep;28(57):1-194. doi: 10.3310/PWCB4016.
7
Accuracy and technical characteristics of CYP2C19 point of care tests: a systematic review.基于即时检测的 CYP2C19 检测方法的准确性和技术特征:系统评价。
Pharmacogenomics. 2024;25(8-9):407-423. doi: 10.1080/14622416.2024.2392479. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Loss-of-Function Carriers with Stroke or TIA.
替卡格雷与氯吡格雷在伴有卒中和 TIA 的功能丧失型携带者中的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 30;385(27):2520-2530. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2111749. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
4
Cost-effectiveness of CYP2C19 genotyping to guide antiplatelet therapy for acute minor stroke and high-risk transient ischemic attack.CYP2C19 基因分型指导急性小卒中和高危短暂性脑缺血发作抗血小板治疗的成本效益。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 1;11(1):7383. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86824-9.
5
Cost Effectiveness of Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy in Asian Ischemic Stroke Patients: Ticagrelor as an Alternative to Clopidogrel in Patients with CYP2C19 Loss of Function Mutations.基因型指导的抗血小板治疗在亚洲缺血性脑卒中患者中的成本效果:替格瑞洛作为 CYP2C19 功能丧失突变患者中氯吡格雷的替代药物。
Clin Drug Investig. 2020 Nov;40(11):1063-1070. doi: 10.1007/s40261-020-00970-y.
6
Risk and Secondary Prevention of Stroke Recurrence: A Population-Base Cohort Study.风险与卒中复发的二级预防:基于人群的队列研究。
Stroke. 2020 Aug;51(8):2435-2444. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.028992. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
7
Calculating and Interpreting ICERs and Net Benefit.计算和解释增量成本效果比(ICER)和净收益。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Aug;38(8):785-807. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00914-6.
8
The future incidence, prevalence and costs of stroke in the UK.英国未来的中风发病率、患病率和成本。
Age Ageing. 2020 Feb 27;49(2):277-282. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz163.
9
Systematic review of the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomics-guided treatment for cardiovascular diseases.系统评价遗传药理学指导心血管疾病治疗的成本效益的证据。
Genet Med. 2020 Mar;22(3):475-486. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0667-y. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
10
Ticagrelor plus aspirin versus clopidogrel plus aspirin for platelet reactivity in patients with minor stroke or transient ischaemic attack: open label, blinded endpoint, randomised controlled phase II trial.替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林与氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林治疗小卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作患者的血小板反应:开放标签、盲终点、随机对照二期试验。
BMJ. 2019 Jun 6;365:l2211. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l2211.